HR 3116 would establish a Commission on Exploring the Creation of a Sovereign Wealth Fund of the United States to study feasibility, governance, and use cases for a national fund owned and managed by the United States. The Commission would be empowered to gather data, host hearings, and solicit input from a wide range of stakeholders, then present findings and legislative recommendations to Congress within two years of its first meeting.
The Commission’s membership is defined in statute: six representatives from the Federal Reserve System, three from the Department of the Treasury, three from the Securities and Exchange Commission, two from the Department of Commerce, one from the Office of the United States Trade Representative, and ten academics or experts in relevant fields. It would meet at least quarterly, have authority to hire staff and engage consultants, and operate under a governance framework aligned with international sovereign wealth fund principles.
The bill does not itself create a fund; it creates the body to study whether one should exist and how it should be governed and operated.
At a Glance
What It Does
Establishes the Commission and defines its composition, powers, and timeline to study a national sovereign wealth fund. It requires an in-depth investigation of revenue sources, asset types, governance, and potential uses of fund assets.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the Federal Reserve System, the Department of the Treasury, the SEC, the Department of Commerce, the Office of the USTR, and the pool of academic and industry experts who would participate.
Why It Matters
Sets up a formal, policy-focused process to assess whether a sovereign wealth fund could be viable, how it would be governed, and how it might influence fiscal policy, currency stability, and long-term national investments.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a new panel—the Commission on Exploring the Creation of a Sovereign Wealth Fund of the United States—to study whether the United States should establish a national sovereign wealth fund and, if so, how it should be run. The Commission would be chaired by the Federal Reserve and include six Fed representatives, three Treasury officials, three SEC members, two Commerce officials, one USTR official, and ten academic or policy experts.
It would meet at least once per quarter and could hire staff and contract with outside experts to perform its work. The Commission’s mandate covers governance, legal structure, and operational logistics, drawing on internationally recognized principles for sovereign wealth funds.
It would examine revenue sources, possible asset classes, and potential uses for fund wealth, including impacts on the fiscal balance, currency dynamics, and broader economic outcomes. The Commission must deliver a detailed report with findings and policy recommendations within two years of its first meeting, and minority views may be included if offered.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Not later than 90 days after enactment, the Fed Chair must establish the Commission.
The Commission will include 6 Fed Reserve reps, 3 Treasury, 3 SEC, 2 Commerce, 1 USTR, and 10 academics.
The Commission can hold hearings, hire staff, and contract with experts.
It will study revenue sources, asset classes, governance, and uses of a future fund.
A final report with findings and legislative recommendations is due within 2 years of the first meeting.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Establishment of the Commission
Not later than 90 days after enactment, the Chair of the Federal Reserve shall establish the Commission on Exploring the Creation of a Sovereign Wealth Fund of the United States. The Commission’s purpose is to study and make recommendations to Congress about creating a national sovereign wealth fund owned and managed by the United States.
Membership
The Commission shall include six representatives from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or a Federal Reserve bank, three Treasury representatives, three SEC representatives, two Commerce representatives, one USTR representative, and ten academics or experts. All appointments are made by the respective appointing authorities.
Terms and Vacancies
Members are appointed to two-year terms and may be reappointed for an additional two-year term. Vacancies must be filled within 30 days in the same manner as the original appointment.
Meetings
The Commission must meet at least quarterly and within 60 days after all members are appointed. It may form subcommittees and will operate with a quorum of a majority of its members.
Chairperson
The Commission shall select a Chairperson from among its members. If the position becomes vacant, a new Chairperson must be chosen within 30 days.
Investigation Scope
The Commission will examine the feasibility, limitations, and implications of creating and operating the Fund, including revenue sources (e.g., natural resources, taxes, fees, foreign reserves) and asset types (stocks, bonds, real assets, private equity). It will consider fund usage (general revenue, program funding, stabilization measures, debt reduction, infrastructure, etc.) and governance under GAPP/Santiago Principles, including oversight, accounting, and interactions with federal agencies.
Powers
The Commission may hold hearings, request agency staff on a reimbursable basis, hire experts, use the Postal Service, obtain administrative support, and contract with entities or individuals. It may compensate staff and travel at rates consistent with federal guidelines, and may employ personnel up to levels that match the Executive Schedule pay framework.
Report
Not later than two years after the first meeting, the Commission must submit a public report with its findings and detailed legislative recommendations. The report may include minority views.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federal Reserve System (Board and regional banks) gains access to structured analysis on a sovereign wealth fund and related governance implications.
- U.S. Department of the Treasury benefits from a clear assessment of revenue sources and potential uses of fund assets.
- Securities and Exchange Commission benefits from governance, transparency, and oversight considerations in asset management.
- Academia and policy researchers gain a formal platform to contribute expertise and data-driven analysis.
- Financial markets and investors benefit from clearer policy questions and potential macroeconomic implications.
- Congressional oversight bodies gain detailed findings and actionable legislative options.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies that appoint and support Commission members will commit staff time and resources.
- Taxpayers bear the indirect costs of federal personnel, hearings, and any policy actions that may follow from the Commission’s recommendations.
- Private sector consultants and contractors engaged by the Commission will incur costs to provide research and advisory services.
- The federal budget may incur costs to fund staff, travel, and operations of the Commission.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The core tension is whether creating a sovereign wealth fund is a prudent extension of fiscal policy and macro management, balanced against the risks of fiscal expansion, political influence, and market distortions. The bill directs a rigorous feasibility study, but it leaves unresolved how aggressive asset accumulation should be, how funds are harvested and used, and how independence from political cycles would be maintained.
The bill creates a formal research Commission and tasks it with exploring multiple hard policy questions—revenue generation, asset allocation, and governance—using international principles as a benchmark. That creates policy tensions around the scale and purpose of a sovereign fund, potential effects on fiscal balance and currency, and the risks of political interference in asset management and oversight.
The framework relies on the Commission’s independent analysis, but it does not define a sunset or a funding envelope beyond staff and contract authority, leaving the path to legislative action open but unsettled.
A central implementation challenge is aligning a future fund’s structure with existing federal agencies and budgeting practices. The Commission’s ability to hire staff and contract out work helps, but it also raises questions about accountability, transparency, and long-run costs.
The bill requires a comprehensive report with recommendations, but it leaves open how Congress should act on those recommendations and what exact fiscal or regulatory changes would ensue.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.