The Regulation Advancement for Capital Enhancement Act of 2025 (the RACE Act) would amend the Securities Act of 1933 to add a new provision that automatically deems an offering statement for a new class of securities qualified if it is substantially similar to an existing class, the new class is under $5 million, and the total amount raised across similar offerings in the prior 12 months stays within the exemption’s aggregate cap. The new class may have terms that differ from the original, and no additional qualification process is required beyond filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In practical terms, the bill lowers friction for issuers using Regulation A Tier 2 by allowing multiple smaller offerings to be brought to market more quickly within a one-year window, provided they meet the specified criteria. The change preserves the general structure of the Reg A regime and the aggregate cap, but shifts some screening from a case-by-case qualification to a deemed-qualification upon filing, reducing administrative overhead for compliant issuers and their counsel.
At a Glance
What It Does
Adds a new 3(b)(6) to the Securities Act that automatically deems a new class offering qualified if the class is substantially similar to the original, under $5 million in offering amount, and within the prior 12-month aggregate cap.
Who It Affects
Issuers of Regulation A Tier 2 securities and their filing teams; SEC review staff handling Reg A filings; and securities counsel advising on multi-class offerings.
Why It Matters
Creates a faster path to market for staggered Reg A Tier 2 offerings while maintaining an overall cap to protect investors and preserve oversight boundaries.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill amends the Securities Act to introduce an automatic qualification mechanism for additional classes of securities offered under Regulation A Tier 2. If an issuer has already filed and qualified an initial class, a new class that is substantially similar, with an offering amount under $5 million, can be deemed qualified by the SEC upon filing—without a new, separate qualification decision.
The total amount raised across all such additional classes in the prior 12 months must not exceed the existing aggregate cap for offerings under the same exemption. Importantly, the new class does not need to share the same terms as the original class.
This change is designed to streamline capital raises for issuers relying on Regulation A Tier 2 by reducing the regulatory friction of repeatedly seeking qualification for each new class. It preserves the general framework of Regulation A and the one-year cap, but shifts some review responsibilities toward the act of filing and away from repeated, discrete qualification determinations.
By doing so, it aims to accelerate funding timelines for smaller offerings while maintaining a guardrail through the 12-month aggregate limit.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Adds 3(b)(6) to automatically deem new Reg A Tier 2 class offerings qualified upon SEC filing.
Each new class must be under $5,000,000 in offering amount.
The aggregate amount of all such new classes in the prior 12 months must stay within the Reg A exemption’s 12-month cap.
New class offerings must be substantially similar to the original and share predefined characteristics.
No requirement that the new class have identical terms or structure to the original.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Regulation Advancement for Capital Enhancement Act of 2025 (the RACE Act). It establishes the formal naming convention for the statute as it moves through the Congress and into law.
Offering of substantially similar securities
This section adds a new subsection (6) to Section 3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933. It authorizes an automatic qualification where an issuer files an offering statement for an additional class of securities that is substantially similar to an already qualified class, with an offering amount under $5 million, and where the aggregate amount of all such additional classes in the prior 12 months does not exceed the existing aggregate exemption limit. Importantly, there is no requirement that the additional class share the same terms as the original; substantial similarity is defined by common characteristics rather than identical terms. This creates a deemed-qualification mechanism upon filing, rather than a separate qualification decision for every new class.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Issuers that rely on Regulation A Tier 2 and seek to broaden their capital raises within a 12‑month window, benefiting from reduced filing friction and faster time-to-market.
- In-house counsel and corporate counsel managing Reg A programs, who gain from streamlined multi-class offerings.
- Reg A specialists, including securities lawyers and compliance professionals, who can serve more efficiently as offerings scale under the deemed-qualification framework.
- Underwriters and brokers facilitating Reg A Tier 2 placements may experience faster deal flow as offerings advance with less back-and-forth on qualification.
Who Bears the Cost
- The SEC, which must monitor and enforce the new deemed-qualification process and ensure compliance with the 12-month cap.
- Investors may face increased density of smaller Reg A offerings within a single year, raising questions about comparative disclosure and oversight if not carefully managed.
- Issuers who miscalculate or misinterpret the 12-month aggregate cap or the “substantially similar” standard may face qualification variability or inadvertent exemptions.
- Regulators at state level may bear transitional costs as market practice adapts to the new framework.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing accelerated access to capital for issuers through automatic qualification with the risk that more frequent, smaller offerings could erode the checks and disclosures that come with explicit qualification decisions.
The bill’s shift toward deemed qualifications for additional Reg A Tier 2 classes raises important tensions. On the one hand, it advances capital formation and reduces administrative drag for issuers pursuing sequential, smaller offerings.
On the other hand, it concentrates additional offerings within a rolling 12-month window, potentially expanding the aggregate exposure of investors to Reg A securities. The standards for “substantially similar” terms and the absence of a requirement for identical terms could undermine some investor protections by enabling more variation across classes while still counting toward the same exemption cap.
Practical implementation will hinge on how well issuers track multiple offerings and how regulators supervise the aggregation rules to prevent inadvertent overages or misclassifications.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.