The Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act of 2025 makes it unlawful for any person to provide, advertise, or knowingly facilitate conversion therapy when the practice is commercially compensated. The bill defines conversion therapy broadly as any practice that seeks to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity, and it excludes gender-affirming treatment and sexual-orientation‑neutral support or safety-focused interventions.
Rather than treating conversion therapy as a health‑licensing violation, the bill frames it as an unfair or deceptive act under the FTC Act. The Federal Trade Commission may promulgate rules, investigate, and use its full enforcement toolkit; the Attorney General can bring federal civil suits; and state attorneys general may sue on behalf of residents with a required notice-and-intervention regime for the FTC.
The statute targets providers, advertisers, platforms, and vendors who receive payment tied to conversion therapy while carving out a First Amendment protection for certain products or services.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill prohibits providing, advertising, or knowingly facilitating conversion therapy when monetary compensation (direct or through an integral product/service) is involved, while exempting gender-transition care and neutral support. It treats violations as unfair or deceptive practices under the FTC Act, giving the FTC rulemaking and enforcement powers and permitting federal and state civil actions.
Who It Affects
Licensed clinicians, counselors, religious or lay counselors who receive payment, advertisers and online platforms that host or place ads for conversion services, and companies selling products or services integral to those practices. State attorneys general and the Department of Justice gain enforcement pathways as well.
Why It Matters
This bill shifts enforcement of conversion‑therapy prohibitions into consumer‑protection law at the federal level, creating a uniform statutory framing and a new target set (advertising, facilitation, and commerce). It creates novel tensions with free‑speech, religious‑liberty claims and with state licensing regimes because it proceeds through the FTC rather than health licensing boards.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act defines conversion therapy by its purpose—any practice that seeks to change sexual orientation or gender identity, or to reduce same‑gender attractions—and then ties the definition to commercial compensation. That linkage is key: purely volunteer or uncompensated efforts fall outside the statute, while direct payment, or payment for a product or service integral to the practice, brings the provider within the ban unless the product or service is First Amendment–protected.
The primary prohibited acts are threefold: providing conversion therapy; advertising claims that the practice can change orientation or identity, eliminate same‑gender attractions, or is harmless; and knowingly assisting or facilitating the provision of conversion therapy when the facilitator receives compensation connected to the activity. The bill expressly preserves space for legitimate care: assistance for individuals undergoing gender transition and acceptance‑oriented, sexual‑orientation‑neutral interventions remain permitted.Enforcement sits mainly with the Federal Trade Commission.
The bill treats violations as equivalent to unfair or deceptive acts under the FTC Act, enabling the Commission to use its existing investigative, rulemaking, and remedial authorities, and to seek civil penalties and injunctive relief under the remedies available to the FTC. The Attorney General may bring federal civil suits, and state attorneys general may sue as parens patriae on behalf of residents, but must notify the FTC and are subject to a preemption rule while an FTC action against the same defendant is pending.Practical compliance choices driven by the statute will center on three questions for providers and vendors: (1) whether a given counseling or program “seeks to change” orientation or identity; (2) whether any payment or product is “integral” to that practice; and (3) whether advertising statements make the prohibited claims.
Online intermediaries and advertisers will need to review ad content and monetization arrangements because hosting paid listings, subscription products, or integrated services tied to conversion outcomes can trigger liability. The law’s severability clause aims to limit the impact of any future court ruling that strikes parts of the statute.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill bans providing, advertising, or knowingly facilitating conversion therapy whenever the practitioner or facilitator receives monetary compensation or is paid via a product/service integral to the therapy.
Conversion therapy is defined by purpose—attempts to change sexual orientation or gender identity, including efforts to reduce same‑gender attractions or alter gender expression.
The Federal Trade Commission enforces the law by treating violations as unfair or deceptive acts under the FTC Act and may issue regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act.
State attorneys general can bring parens patriae suits but must notify the FTC and cannot pursue defendants named in an existing FTC action while that action is pending; the FTC may intervene in state suits.
The statute carves out explicit exceptions for assistance in a gender transition and for sexual‑orientation‑neutral counseling aimed at support, coping, or preventing unlawful or unsafe conduct.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Formalizes the Act’s public name — 'Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act of 2025.' This is administrative but signals the drafters’ intent to treat conversion therapy as consumer fraud rather than a medical‑licensing matter.
Congressional findings
Summarizes scientific and professional consensus that sexual orientation and gender identity are not disorders and that conversion therapy is ineffective and harmful. These findings supply a legislative factual predicate the government can cite in enforcement actions and rulemakings to justify FTC intervention and to counter defenses that the practice is medically validated.
Definitions and scope (conversion therapy, compensation, exceptions)
Provides operative definitions: 'conversion therapy' is practice seeking to change sexual orientation or gender identity; 'person' is broadly defined to capture individuals and entities. The compensation trigger includes direct payment and indirect payment tied to a product or service 'integral' to the therapy, but excludes products/services protected by the First Amendment. It also preserves affirmative exceptions for gender‑transition assistance and sexual‑orientation‑neutral supportive interventions, narrowing the statute’s reach.
Prohibited conduct (provide, advertise, assist/facilitate)
Makes it unlawful to provide conversion therapy, to advertise claims that it changes orientation/identity or is harmless, and to knowingly assist or facilitate conversion therapy when the assister is compensated. The advertising ban targets specific claims rather than all discussion of sexual orientation, so compliance will hinge on how firms draft marketing copy and what counts as 'seeking to change.'
Enforcement framework — FTC, Attorney General, and State AGs
Treats violations as unfair or deceptive acts under the FTC Act and imports the FTC’s investigatory, rulemaking, and remedial authorities. The Attorney General may bring federal civil suits; state AGs can sue as parens patriae but must notify the FTC, which can intervene in state actions. The statute also contains venue and service rules and a provision that prevents state suits against defendants already targeted by the FTC until the FTC’s action concludes, creating an ordered federal‑state enforcement sequence.
Severability
Preserves the remainder of the Act if any provision is held unconstitutional. This is standard drafting but matters here because courts may scrutinize the Act for First Amendment or Commerce Clause issues; the clause increases the likelihood that a court would save unaffected portions rather than striking the entire law.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Civil Rights across all five countries.
Explore Civil Rights in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- LGBTQ+ individuals and families — The ban removes a commercial avenue for harmful practices and curbs advertising claims that could mislead vulnerable consumers, reducing direct risk of harm and fraud.
- Consumers generally — Framing conversion therapy as consumer fraud brings FTC investigative resources and remedies to bear, deterring false marketing and commercial exploitation beyond licensed‑care channels.
- State attorneys general and consumer protection advocates — The Act supplies an explicit statutory basis for parens patriae enforcement and a clear factual record in its findings to support litigation and settlements.
Who Bears the Cost
- Providers and facilitators of paid conversion therapy (licensed and unlicensed) — They face an across‑the‑board commercial ban, exposure to FTC enforcement, and potential civil actions from federal and state governments.
- Online platforms and advertisers — Sites that host paid listings, run targeted ads, or process payments for programs claiming conversion outcomes will need to revise ad policies, seller agreements, and monetization flows to avoid facilitation liability.
- Small faith‑based organizations and vendors selling integral products or services — Entities receiving payment tied to conversion programs may face compliance risks and litigation exposure, even if they operate under religious mission statements.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is protecting vulnerable people from a commercially sold, harmful practice versus preserving constitutional protections for speech and religious practice. Framing conversion therapy as consumer fraud empowers the FTC to stop commercial exploitation but risks overbreadth and legal challenges about regulating counseling content, religiously motivated speech, and services that sit at the border of protected expression and commercial conduct.
The bill’s commercial‑compensation trigger and the carveout for First Amendment‑protected products or services create practical ambiguity. Determining when a product or service is 'integral' to conversion therapy will fall to regulators and courts and could sweep in innocuous goods (books, online courses, membership platforms) or exclude certain speech‑protected activities depending on judicial interpretation.
Similarly, proving that a practice 'seeks to change' identity or orientation introduces evidentiary challenges: an adversary can claim neutral intent while offering interventions that regulators view as conversion in effect.
The decision to enforce through the FTC, not through health‑care licensing boards, avoids medical‑licensing heterogeneity but invites constitutional scrutiny. Consumer‑protection enforcement is less familiar with assessing clinical practices and may struggle with standards of care evidence and expert testimony.
At the same time, the Act limits duplicative state litigation while allowing state AGs to act—FTC intervention and the statutory preemption window mean enforcement sequencing will matter and could delay relief in particular cases. Finally, the statute does not define civil‑penalty scales or private‑right remedies for individual victims, leaving open questions about individual damages, mandatory restitution, and how injunctive relief will be structured across online and offline remedies.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.