The bill designates the peak of Frenchman Mountain in Nevada, located at latitude 36°10′45″ N and longitude 114°59′52″ W, as Maude Frazier Mountain. It also provides that any reference in law, maps, regulations, documents, records, or other papers of the United States to the designated peak shall be deemed to be a reference to Maude Frazier Mountain.
This is a naming action with no other policy changes described in the text beyond the designation and cross-referencing requirement.
At a Glance
What It Does
Designates the Nevada peak at the specified coordinates as Maude Frazier Mountain and requires that references to the peak in federal laws and documents reflect the new name.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies that reference geographic names, and state/local authorities updating maps or signage; Nevada communities relying on official maps and documents.
Why It Matters
Establishes an official nomenclature across federal systems, reducing ambiguity in legal and regulatory contexts and memorializing the chosen eponym in national records.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill focuses on a single naming action: it designates a specific peak in Nevada—Frenchman Mountain at the precise coordinates given—as Maude Frazier Mountain. By design, this is a mechanism to standardize the official name used in federal laws, maps, regulations, and other documents.
The designation is explicit in Section 1(a), which assigns the new name to the peak, and Section 1(b), which ensures that any subsequent reference to the peak in federal materials is treated as Maude Frazier Mountain.
There is no indication in the text of changes to land ownership, management, or authority over the peak. The bill does not create funding, authorize new programs, or alter regulatory powers; it is a ceremonial renaming with a cross-reference requirement to maintain consistency across official records.
The sponsor is Rep. Dina Titus, and the measure was introduced on January 9, 2025, in the 119th Congress and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.Because this is a simple naming action, the practical impact centers on the consistency of nomenclature in federal materials and the potential effects on signage and map displays used by federal, state, and local entities.
Administrators and cartographers are the primary payload for implementing this change.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The peak designated is Frenchman Mountain in Nevada, at coordinates 36°10′45″ N, 114°59′52″ W, renamed Maude Frazier Mountain.
Section 1(a) designates the peak by name; Section 1(b) requires all references to the peak in federal laws, maps, regulations, and records to reflect the new name.
Introduced January 9, 2025 by Representative Dina Titus (D-NV) in the 119th Congress; referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.
There are no funding provisions or substantive policy changes beyond the naming and cross-reference requirement.
The bill title itself states the purpose: designation of a Nevada peak as Maude Frazier Mountain, and for other purposes.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Designation of Maude Frazier Mountain
Section 1(a) designates the peak of Frenchman Mountain in Nevada, identified by the coordinates 36°10′45″ N, 114°59′52″ W, as Maude Frazier Mountain. This creates an official, recognized name that will be used in federal documents and references moving forward.
References to the peak
Section 1(b) clarifies that any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, record, or other paper of the United States to the designated peak shall be deemed to be a reference to Maude Frazier Mountain. This ensures consistency across federal materials and reduces ambiguity in administrative, regulatory, and legal contexts.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- USGS Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) updates to reflect the official name across databases and maps.
- Federal agencies that rely on standardized geographic names for regulation, reporting, and resource management.
- Nevada state and local authorities responsible for signage, tourism materials, and official maps.
- Outdoor recreation communities and travelers who consult official maps and signage.
- Educational and historical organizations referencing the peak in programs and materials.
Who Bears the Cost
- GNIS and other federal mapping databases will need updates to reflect the new name.
- State and local agencies may incur minor costs to update signage, brochures, and local maps that reference the peak.
- Cartography and GIS vendors may bear routine data-update costs associated with the name change.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between establishing an official, standardized name in federal systems and preserving local or historical naming conventions that communities may still use in everyday speech and signage.
The bill is a focused naming action with a straightforward cross-reference provision. While the text does not raise policy shifts or funding, the practical implications include updating official maps, signage, and database entries to reflect Maude Frazier Mountain.
Implementation would primarily involve federal agencies, particularly those maintaining geographic names databases and mapping systems, and state or local entities that derive their signage and informational materials from federal designations. Potential tensions could arise from existing local or indigenous references to the peak or from the administrative effort required to update a wide array of materials across jurisdictions.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.