The bill creates a time-limited package of changes to the Affordable Care Act and Internal Revenue Code designed to give low‑income residents of states that have not expanded Medicaid access to much more affordable Marketplace coverage. It does this by (1) expanding who receives cost‑sharing reductions and pushing those plans to act like near‑full‑coverage policies for the poorest enrollees, (2) making people below the poverty line eligible for premium tax credits, (3) opening continuous enrollment windows and funding outreach, and (4) temporarily increasing the federal Medicaid match for newly eligible adults to encourage states to expand.
For compliance officers and benefits managers, the bill creates operational requirements for issuers, Exchanges, HHS, and employers: issuers must implement deeper cost‑sharing cuts and provide added benefits for certain low‑income enrollees; Exchanges must run continuous special enrollment and expanded navigator/outreach programs; and the IRS rules change eligibility, reconciliation, and employer reporting. The package is time‑limited in multiple places (most provisions run through 2026–2028), so program design, cash flow, and reconciliation mechanics are front‑and‑center implementation risks.
At a Glance
What It Does
Amends ACA sections to (a) expand cost‑sharing reduction rules and require issuers to boost plan actuarial value for enrollees at or below 138% FPL, with federal reimbursements to issuers; (b) create a continuous special enrollment for those under 138% FPL who lack minimum essential coverage; (c) require additional non‑EHB benefits in certain silver plans for 2026–2027; and (d) temporarily broaden premium tax credit eligibility and change employer shared responsibility rules.
Who It Affects
Health insurers selling qualified health plans on Exchanges, state and federally‑run Exchanges, low‑income uninsured residents (especially those ≤138% FPL in non‑expansion states), HHS and IRS for implementation, and employers that offer small‑employer HRAs or face employer mandate calculations.
Why It Matters
The bill effectively uses Marketplace subsidies as a stopgap for populations left out by state non‑expansion, shifts substantial near‑term costs to the federal government via appropriations and reimbursements, and creates operational changes (payment flows, SEP rules, outreach grants) that carriers, Exchanges, and tax administrators must implement quickly.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The core idea is to make Marketplace coverage affordable for people who would be Medicaid‑eligible if their state had expanded but instead fall into the coverage gap. The bill forces qualified health plan issuers to reduce out‑of‑pocket costs for enrollees whose household income is at or below 138% of the federal poverty line.
For plan years 2026–2028 the law requires those issuers to raise the plan’s share of allowed benefit costs for these enrollees up to 99 percent; HHS will reimburse insurers for a portion of those costs through a periodic payment equal to 12 percent of allowed benefits for each affected enrollee. Insurers must notify HHS of the reductions to receive the payments.
To increase take‑up, the bill creates a continuous special enrollment period for people under 138% of poverty who lack minimum essential coverage (except certain mandated types), and it requires federally run Exchanges to run culturally and linguistically tailored outreach in non‑expansion states with new grant and user‑fee‑supported funding. Separately, for plan years 2026 and 2027, silver‑level plans subject to the bill must cover two categories of non‑EHB services (non‑emergency medical transportation and certain services listed in Medicaid statute) without cost‑sharing and without restricting provider choice; HHS will reimburse issuers for those additional benefits.On the tax side, the bill temporarily removes the lower income boundary from the premium tax credit rules so people below 100% of FPL can qualify for advance credits for taxable years beginning in 2026–2028, adds carve‑outs so certain low‑income employees offered employer coverage remain eligible for credits, and narrows recapture exposure for very low‑income taxpayers.
It also adjusts the employer shared responsibility rules to exclude credits and reductions for employees at or under 138% FPL from generating employer penalties. Finally, the bill raises the federal matching rate for newly eligible Medicaid adults to 93% for calendar quarters in 2026–2028, stepping down to 90% in 2029 and thereafter — a direct fiscal incentive for states to expand Medicaid.
The Five Things You Need to Know
For plan years 2026–2028, an enrollee determined to have household income ≤138% FPL is treated as a 'specified enrollee' and must receive cost‑sharing reductions that push the plan’s share of allowed costs for that person to 99 percent.
HHS will pay issuers periodic reimbursements equal to 12 percent of total allowed costs for benefits furnished to specified enrollees during plan years 2026–2028; those payments are financed by an appropriation specifically authorized in the bill.
Qualified silver plans subject to the bill must provide non‑emergency medical transportation and certain Medicaid‑listed services (per section 1905 references) without cost‑sharing and without limiting provider choice for eligible individuals in plan years 2026 and 2027; issuers are reimbursed for these services.
The Internal Revenue Code changes make households below 100% FPL eligible for premium tax credits for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025 and before January 1, 2029, and add a carve‑out limiting employer mandate exposure for employees with household income ≤138% FPL.
The federal match for newly eligible Medicaid adults increases to 93% for calendar quarters in 2026–2028 and then to 90% beginning in 2029, a temporary fiscal incentive aimed at encouraging state expansion.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Expanded cost‑sharing reductions and 99% actuarial target for poorest enrollees
This amendment modifies ACA section 1402 to expand eligibility rules for cost‑sharing reductions and to create a special rule for 'specified enrollees' (those with household income at or below 138% FPL) for plan years 2026–2028. The Secretary must set issuer procedures that reduce cost‑sharing enough to raise a plan’s share of allowed benefit costs to 99% for these enrollees. Issuers that implement the reductions notify HHS and receive periodic payments equal to 12% of allowed costs for such enrollees; the bill explicitly authorizes appropriations for those payments. Practically, carriers will need to reprice products and update benefit and IT systems to implement the deeper CSR levels, while HHS must establish payment and reporting channels.
Continuous special enrollment for people ≤138% FPL
The bill changes ACA section 1311(c) to require that, for Exchanges subject to the new cost‑sharing rules, individuals with household income ≤138% FPL who lack minimum essential coverage be allowed to enroll during a continuous special enrollment period beginning the first month they meet the criteria. That creates an open‑ended enrollment window for the target population instead of the typical fixed annual enrollment period, which affects outreach, eligibility verification, and payment timing for issuers and Exchanges.
Required additional benefits in silver plans for 2026–2027
Amendments to ACA section 1301 add a temporary requirement that silver plans subject to the CSR rules must cover, for eligible low‑income individuals, (1) non‑emergency medical transportation services and (2) services referenced to Medicaid’s list (section 1905(a)(4)(C)) that would have been federally reimbursable under title XIX if delivered under a State plan. These benefits must be provided without cost‑sharing and without restricting choice of qualified providers. The bill authorizes HHS reimbursements to issuers for those services during plan years 2026 and 2027, creating a new payer relationship between HHS and commercial carriers for benefits normally within Medicaid’s domain.
Outreach, navigators, and targeted grants for non‑expansion states
The Exchange statute (section 1321(c)) gains a subsection requiring HHS‑operated Exchanges to run culturally and linguistically appropriate outreach for residents of states that have not expanded Medicaid, with earmarked appropriations: $105 million total for fiscal 2026–2028 (phased as $15M 2026 and $30M each for 2027–2028). The navigator program provisions also direct HHS to award grants funded in part by user fees ($10M in FY2026 and $20M in FY2027 and FY2028) to entities serving non‑expansion states. Those provisions commit federal funds to enrollment assistance and create new grant administration work for HHS.
Temporary premium credit expansion and employer/recapture rule tweaks
The Internal Revenue Code is amended (new 36B(h)) to make taxpayers below 100% FPL eligible for premium tax credits for taxable years beginning in 2026–2028, adjust affordability determinations for employees offered employer coverage (including QSEHRAs), and limit recapture (reconciliation) exposure for taxpayers under 200% FPL. Section 4980H is changed to exclude from the employer mandate calculation credits and cost‑sharing reductions received by employees with household income ≤138% FPL during the covered years. These provisions change who gets advance credits, how reconciliation and filing obligations work, and how the employer mandate is applied.
Temporary FMAP bump for newly eligible Medicaid adults
The bill tweaks section 1905(y)(1) of the Social Security Act to set the enhanced FMAP for newly eligible mandatory adults at 93% for calendar quarters in 2026–2028 and 90% beginning in 2029. The change is targeted to the specific population created by Medicaid expansion under title XIX and is a direct federal fiscal lever to encourage states that have not expanded to consider doing so.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Low‑income uninsured in non‑expansion states (particularly those ≤138% FPL) — they gain eligibility for premium tax credits, deeper cost‑sharing reductions (near‑zero out‑of‑pocket), continuous enrollment, and, in 2026–2027, no‑cost access to certain transportation and Medicaid‑style services.
- Health insurance issuers participating on Exchanges — they receive HHS reimbursements (12% of allowed costs for specified enrollees and payments for added silver benefits) to offset the mandated reductions in enrollee cost‑sharing and new service coverage.
- Consumers with incomes between 100% and 138% FPL who previously fell into the Medicaid coverage gap — the package closes coverage gaps by combining credits, CSRs, and SEP access.
- Federally‑operated Exchanges and community navigators — increased grant funding and user‑fee allocations support expanded outreach and assisted enrollment work, improving resources for enrollment in hard‑to‑reach communities.
- States considering Medicaid expansion — the temporary 93% FMAP for newly eligible adults during 2026–2028 strengthens the fiscal case for expansion.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal budget/taxpayers — the bill authorizes new appropriations and permanent/temporary tax credit outlays and raises Medicaid FMAP costs in the short term, increasing federal health spending.
- Issuers (short‑term cash flow and operations) — carriers must front implementation costs (benefit redesign, IT updates, claims flows) and may face timing mismatches between paying providers and receiving HHS reimbursements.
- HHS and Exchange operators — agencies must build new payment mechanisms, verify ‘specified enrollees,’ run continuous SEP rules, administer grants, and manage reconciliation data flows with the IRS, requiring staffing and systems work.
- Employers and payroll administrators — while the employer mandate carve‑out reduces some penalty exposure for employers with low‑income employees, employers must handle changed affordability calculations and possible employee claims for advance credits or reconciliation.
- States with existing Medicaid programs — coordination challenges may arise if Marketplace plans begin covering services traditionally covered by Medicaid, complicating care coordination and enrollee routing between programs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether to prioritize immediate access to near‑Medicaid levels of coverage for low‑income people in non‑expansion states (using Marketplace subsidies and federal spending) or to rely on fiscal incentives to induce state Medicaid expansion; the bill attempts both, but doing so creates trade‑offs between speed of access, administrative complexity, federal cost, and the long‑term policy goal of universal state expansion.
The bill stitches together Marketplace subsidies and temporary matching incentives as a pragmatic fix for people stranded by non‑expansion states, but it leaves several operational and policy questions unresolved. The 12% reimbursement figure is a blunt instrument: it may not align with actual claim experience for deep CSR levels or the additional silver benefits, exposing issuers to either under‑ or over‑compensation depending on utilization patterns.
HHS must establish definitions and verification processes for who is a 'specified enrollee' in real time; income volatility and retroactive eligibility changes could produce reconciliation headaches and administrative appeals. The tax changes that allow below‑100% FPL households to receive advance credits also expand the pool of non‑filers and low‑income households for whom reconciliation is challenging; the bill limits recapture exposure for the poorest taxpayers, but it creates new data‑sharing and IRS/Exchange coordination demands.
There is also a program design tension between using federal Marketplace tools to provide immediate relief and preserving incentives for states to expand Medicaid. The temporary FMAP bump tries to square that circle, but it is time‑limited and may not be persuasive enough in politically resistant states.
Adding non‑EHB benefits (NEMT and certain Medicaid services) into commercial silver plans raises provider network, payment, and fraud‑control questions because those services historically rely on Medicaid provider relationships and authorization systems. Finally, the outreach and navigator funding is modest relative to the scale of the uninsured population in non‑expansion states; success hinges on rapid, targeted deployment and measurement of enrollment outcomes.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.