The Organ Donation Referral Improvement Act directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, to conduct and complete a study on how hospitals use electronic automated referrals for organ donation. The study must be finished within one year of enactment and will examine current hospital efforts, potential time and staff savings, and the role of electronic health record data in identifying potential donors.
It also requires a review of best practices, IT security considerations, and the steps needed to promote wider, nationwide use of these referrals. A final report with findings and recommendations will be submitted to relevant congressional committees.
The bill also provides a precise definition of electronic automated referral, describing it as an electronic system that identifies potential deceased organ donors via clinical criteria in a patient’s EHR and automatically refers them to the hospital’s collaborating organ procurement organization. The act does not mandate immediate nationwide implementation; instead, it creates a structured evidence-gathering process to inform future policy decisions.
At a Glance
What It Does
Directs the Department of Health and Human Services to conduct and complete a study within one year on existing hospital efforts regarding electronic automated referrals for organ donation.
Who It Affects
Hospitals, hospital IT departments, organ procurement organizations (OPOs), transplant centers, and health system policy staff.
Why It Matters
It seeks to quantify efficiency gains, assess safety and privacy protections, and establish a knowledge base for potential policy actions to improve organ donation referral practices.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill establishes a federal study to examine how hospitals use electronic automated referrals for organ donation. The study will look at how these referrals work in real-world hospital settings, what time and staffing savings might be achieved, and whether using hospital electronic health records (EHRs) with standardized criteria can improve the identification of potential organ donors.
It will also evaluate the security of the data involved and how such referrals might affect donation volumes. The study will review existing medical literature and best practices, and it will culminate in a formal report to Congress with recommendations to promote broader use if the evidence supports it.
A formal definition of electronic automated referrals is included, tying the concept directly to automated referrals from EHR-based patient criteria to the hospital’s organ procurement organization. The act does not impose a mandate to implement these referrals nationwide; it creates a framework for evidence-based policymaking.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires a Secretary-led study on electronic automated referrals for organ donation within one year of enactment.
It will measure staff time savings and the timeliness of determining donor eligibility.
It will assess whether EHR data and standardized criteria improve donor identification.
It requires a review of peer-reviewed literature on automated referrals.
It will result in a congressional report with recommendations to promote nationwide use if warranted.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section designates the act’s official name for citation—the Organ Donation Referral Improvement Act. It is a naming provision and does not create programmatic obligations or funding by itself.
Study on electronic automated referrals
This section directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to study existing hospital efforts related to electronic automated referrals for organ donation and to complete the study within one year of enactment. It sets the policy goal of building an evidence base rather than mandating immediate changes in practice.
Study timeframe
Not later than one year after enactment, the Secretary must conduct and complete the study on hospital use of electronic automated referrals for organ donation. This provides a concrete, time-bound mandate for data collection and analysis.
Study components
The section enumerates eight specific components the study must address, including staff time savings, variations in timeliness, potential improvements from automated referrals, the role of EHR data and clinical criteria, impact on donation volumes, review of peer-reviewed literature, best practices, and IT security for secure data transmission, plus recommendations to promote use and nationwide adoption where appropriate.
Reporting to Congress
Not later than one year after enactment, the Secretary must submit a report on the study’s results to the relevant congressional committees in both the House and Senate, ensuring that the findings inform policy discussions and potential future actions.
Definition of electronic automated referral
This subsection defines ‘electronic automated referral’ as an electronic system that identifies potential deceased organ donors via clinical criteria in a patient’s electronic health record and automatically refers such patients to the hospital’s collaborating organ procurement organization.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Hospitals and transplant programs that operate modern EHRs with automated referral workflows, which could gain efficiency and clearer referral processes.
- Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and transplant centers that coordinate donor referrals and logistics would benefit from standardized, timely referrals.
- Health-system data analysts and quality teams gain a clearer benchmark and evidence base for referral performance.
- Health policy makers and Congress would obtain rigorous evidence to inform future organ donation policies.
- Health IT vendors offering secure, compliant referral infrastructure may see increased demand.
Who Bears the Cost
- Hospitals and their IT departments may incur data collection, reporting, and possible interface work to participate in the study.
- Organ procurement organizations might participate in data sharing and coordination activities that entail time and resource commitments.
- Health IT vendors may need to adjust products to meet study or security requirements, incurring development or integration costs.
- The federal government (Office of the Secretary and related agencies) bears the cost of conducting the study.
- Compliance, privacy, and security requirements to manage donor data securely may add ongoing costs for hospitals during the study period.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether automation can safely and effectively speed up and improve organ donor referrals across a fragmented health IT landscape without compromising patient privacy, data security, or interoperability.
The bill’s study design hinges on the accuracy and consistency of data across diverse hospital IT systems and EHR platforms. A major tension will be balancing the potential efficiency and care-quality benefits of automated referrals with privacy protections, data security, and the risk of misclassification or alert fatigue if referrals are not well-tuned.
The nationwide adoption question rests on building standardized criteria and interoperable transmission protocols that work across multiple vendors and hospital settings, which could require substantial upfront investment for some institutions. The act also leaves open whether the study will translate into any mandate or funding for broader implementation, pending the study’s findings.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.