The MORE Nurses Act requires the National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice (the Council) to conduct a comprehensive examination of the United States nursing workforce and to produce a public report within one year. The statutory review must cover workforce trends, the capacity to educate future nurses, root causes of the shortage, and the federal policy landscape — including support for nursing education, efforts to increase workforce diversity, and incentives to serve underserved communities.
The bill is study‑focused: it compels a federally‑mandated, time‑bound analysis and a set of policy recommendations (legislative and regulatory) but contains no appropriation or implementation authority. That makes the Act a focused intelligence‑gathering tool for Congress, HHS, and stakeholders rather than a direct funding or programmatic response to the staffing crisis in health care.
At a Glance
What It Does
Directs the National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice to examine U.S. nursing workforce capacity, the ability of education programs to meet demand, causes of the shortage, and relevant federal policies; requires the Council to avoid duplicating prior work and to recommend legislative and regulatory solutions. The Council must submit its findings to the President, Congress, and the HHS Secretary and publish the report online within one year of enactment.
Who It Affects
HHS and its advisory apparatus (including HRSA program offices that fund nursing workforce programs), federal and state policymakers who design workforce supports, nursing schools and clinical training sites, health systems recruiting nurses, and workforce planners in underserved and rural communities. Organized nursing groups and accreditation bodies will also be primary interlocutors during the review.
Why It Matters
The Act centralizes and accelerates federal fact‑finding about the shortage, creating a single, public baseline that Congress and the executive can use to draft targeted policy responses. Because the bill requires recommendations but not funding or mandates, its real power will be political and informational — shaping future legislation, grant priorities, and rulemaking rather than instantly changing workforce numbers.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill adds a short, statutory assignment to the National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice: do a national review of the nursing workforce and deliver an actionable report. The Council’s scope is broad — it must look at macro trends in the nursing labor pool, assess whether nursing education programs can scale up to meet demand, dig into the proximate and structural causes of shortages, and evaluate federal policy levers that influence education, workforce diversity, and deployment to underserved areas.
The Act emphasizes efficiency and coordination: the Council must build on existing studies and avoid repeating work already done by other federal, state, or private task forces. That means the Council will likely inventory prior reports, identify data gaps, and focus its effort on synthesizing findings and filling critical missing evidence rather than producing a wholly new, duplicative survey.On deliverables and timing, the Council has a hard one‑year deadline from enactment to complete its work and submit a written report to the President, Congress, and HHS’s Secretary; the report must be posted online.
The statute also requires the Council to include legislative and regulatory recommendations — i.e., the final product should contain concrete options for lawmakers and regulators to consider, not just a descriptive diagnosis.Importantly, the Act does not appropriate funds or create new programs. Its immediate effect is informational: it elevates the shortage as a federal priority, organizes a structured assessment, and produces a public menu of policy fixes for follow‑up action by Congress and HHS.
How quickly those recommendations translate into money, rulemaking, or program changes will depend on subsequent policymaking.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Council must complete its examination and submit a report within one year of the Act’s enactment.
The report must go to the President, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and Congress, and must be made publicly available online.
The Council is required to review existing studies and avoid unnecessary duplication, directing resources to synthesis and filling data gaps.
The statutory scope explicitly includes federal support for nursing education programs, policies to increase nursing workforce diversity, and incentives for nurses to work in underserved communities.
The Council must provide a set of possible solutions that include legislative and regulatory recommendations, but the Act contains no funding or implementation mandate.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title — 'MORE Nurses Act'
Establishes the Act’s formal name, 'Magnifying Opportunities to Recruit and Educate Nurses Act' (MORE Nurses Act). This is a technical provision but signals the bill’s focus on recruitment and education as primary levers to address the shortage.
Mandated examination: workforce, education capacity, causes, and policy levers
Sets out a four‑part analytical mandate for the National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice: (1) assess national nursing workforce capacity and trends; (2) evaluate the capacity of nursing education to supply future nurses; (3) identify causes of the current shortage; and (4) identify federal policy areas affecting response capacity, explicitly naming support for education programs, workforce diversity, and incentives for underserved areas. Practically, this provision gives the Council authority to convene experts, collect and synthesize data, and frame the policy levers federal actors might use.
One‑year deadline and public report to executive and legislative branches
Requires the Council to complete its work and submit findings, conclusions, and recommendations to the President, Congress, and the HHS Secretary no later than one year after enactment. The Council must also publish the report online. This creates a short, enforceable timeframe for deliverables and ensures public access, but does not specify formats, required analytic methods, or any implementation plan for recommendations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Congressional staff and policymakers — gain a single, publicly available evidence base and a menu of legislative and regulatory options to craft targeted responses.
- State workforce planners and public health agencies — receive a consolidated national assessment they can use to benchmark local shortages and justify state‑level proposals.
- Nursing schools and educators — get an authoritative analysis of 'education capacity' that can inform requests for funding, clinical placement expansions, and faculty recruitment strategies.
- Advocacy groups focused on workforce diversity and rural health — obtain formal findings on barriers and potential federal incentives to improve recruitment and retention in underserved communities.
Who Bears the Cost
- National Advisory Council and HHS staff — must allocate time and existing resources to complete a comprehensive review under a tight one‑year deadline without an explicit appropriation, potentially diverting attention from other advisory work.
- Nursing education programs and health systems — will likely face increased information requests, data calls, and time commitments to participate in consultations and provide evidence to the Council.
- Federal program offices (e.g., HRSA) — may face pressure to respond quickly to recommendations and to provide data, which could strain already stretched analytic capacity.
- Smaller institutions and rural providers — if follow‑on policy changes require matching funds or program redesign, these stakeholders could incur compliance or administrative costs even though the Act itself does not create new funding.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between producing a timely, federally sanctioned roadmap for addressing the nursing shortage and the limits of a study‑only approach: a one‑year assessment can clarify problems and recommend solutions, but without funding or implementation authority it may simply shift expectations onto policymakers and agencies that lack the resources or political appetite to act on the Council’s recommendations.
The Act creates a focused, short‑term fact‑finding exercise but leaves open several implementation and evidence challenges. A one‑year timeline pressures the Council to prioritize synthesis over deep primary data collection; complex workforce dynamics (state licensure differences, clinical training bottlenecks, turnover drivers like burnout and pay disparities) require longitudinal and granular data that may not be uniformly available.
The provision to avoid duplication is sensible, but coordinating across previous federal, state, and private studies will demand careful scoping to determine which gaps genuinely require new analysis versus which can be adopted from existing work.
Another unresolved practical issue is resources. The statute does not appropriate funds to support additional data collection, staff hires, or convening costs; accomplishing a thorough, policy‑ready report within a year will therefore depend on the Council’s existing capacity and HHS’s willingness to prioritize the task.
Finally, because the Act only mandates recommendations and not action, there is a risk the report will identify structural fixes (e.g., increased Title VIII funding, expanded clinical training slots, incentives for rural practice) that Congress or agencies may not adopt — leaving stakeholders with analysis but without the policy levers or funds to change outcomes quickly.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.