The HEALTH for MOM Act of 2025 creates a voluntary Medicaid state plan option allowing states to offer pregnancy- and postpartum-focused ‘‘maternity health homes’’ that deliver coordinated care to eligible pregnant women. The statute defines provider and team qualifications, requires individualized care plans and connections to behavioral health and social supports, and ties payment to a State-specified methodology while treating those payments as medical assistance.
The bill matters because it builds a formal Medicaid pathway to bundle care coordination for high-risk pregnant and postpartum beneficiaries, adds federal incentive funding for early adoption, and imposes new data and reporting expectations designed to track maternal outcomes and service utilization. States, safety-net providers, and Medicaid program managers will need to weigh implementation costs, reporting burdens, and payment design choices against the potential for reduced hospital stays and improved maternal outcomes.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates an optional Medicaid state plan amendment to establish maternity health homes that coordinate pregnancy and postpartum services through a designated provider or health team and requires States to specify payment methodology and report program data.
Who It Affects
Medicaid-enrolled pregnant and recently postpartum women, federally qualified health centers and community clinics, hospitals and emergency departments, state Medicaid agencies, and behavioral health and social service providers engaged in maternal care.
Why It Matters
Offers a mechanism to integrate medical, behavioral, and social supports for high-risk pregnancies within Medicaid, couples federal incentive funding with state flexibility on payment models, and mandates data collection intended to measure maternal morbidity and mortality trends.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill adds a new section to Medicaid (SEC. 1945B) that lets any state elect, via state plan amendment, to offer ‘‘maternity health homes’’ to eligible women who are pregnant and enrolled in full-scope Medicaid. Enrollment in a maternity health home is voluntary for the woman and voluntary for providers; the law explicitly preserves beneficiary choice and provider consent.
The statute excludes women whose coverage is limited to a narrow pregnancy‑only benefits package.
Eligibility is described narrowly: a beneficiary must be enrolled in full medical assistance under the State plan (or an equivalent waiver) and pregnant. The statute also treats the woman as eligible for maternity health home services through either the end of her Medicaid eligibility month or through the last day of the one-year postpartum period, whichever comes first—so the program is expressly designed to cover the pregnancy period and up to a year after delivery where Medicaid eligibility permits.The bill sets out qualification standards for designated providers and health teams: they must demonstrate the ability to coordinate prompt maternity and postpartum care (including specialist referrals), prepare individualized and culturally and linguistically appropriate care plans, incorporate home and community services, and coordinate with pediatric and early intervention providers.
Teams can include a broad array of clinicians—OB/GYNs, midwives, nurses, behavioral health specialists—and may also include doulas, community health workers, translators, and authorized representatives when permitted by the State.On financing, payments to maternity health homes are treated as medical assistance for federal matching purposes; the State specifies the payment methodology in its SPA. The statute allows per-member-per-month payments, prospective payments for FQHCs/RHCs, or other approved alternative models (including 1115 waiver–based approaches), and permits adjustment based on pregnancy or postpartum risk and the intensity of care coordination required.
To encourage adoption, the law increases the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage by 15 percentage points for payments to maternity health homes during the first four fiscal quarters after a SPA takes effect, but caps that enhanced match at 90 percent. The bill also requires provider- and State-level reporting on service offerings, quality measures, demographics, hospitalizations, morbidity, and maternal mortality (with a required distinction between deaths within 42 days and those 43–365 days postpartum), and requires States to protect identifying information under existing Medicaid confidentiality rules.
Finally, the statute authorizes $50 million in planning grants (available beginning October 1, 2025) to help States design SPAs and implementation plans.
The Five Things You Need to Know
A State may not implement the option until it submits and the Secretary approves a state plan amendment that describes provider qualifications, payment methodology, monitoring, and education/outreach processes.
Payments to maternity health homes are treated as Medicaid medical assistance, and the bill temporarily increases the FMAP for those payments by 15 percentage points for the first four fiscal quarters after a SPA is in effect, but no higher than 90% federal share.
Providers and maternity health homes must report identifiable operational data (NPI, services offered) and quality measures to the State to be eligible for payments; States must aggregate and report program metrics to HHS at least annually.
Hospitals participating in Medicaid must adopt procedures to give culturally and linguistically appropriate information to eligible women who present in emergency departments and notify the woman’s maternity health home (if enrolled) about ED care and discharge planning.
The statute authorizes $50 million in planning grants (total) to States for SPA development and requires States to publish an implementation report within 18 months of SPA approval describing practices and rollout.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
State option, enrollment rules, and eligibility window
This subsection creates the state plan pathway and clarifies that both beneficiaries and providers must voluntarily participate. It defines an 'eligible woman' as a pregnant individual enrolled in full‑scope Medicaid (or substantially equivalent waiver coverage), and it sets the continuity rule that eligibility for maternity health home services extends to the earlier of the end of Medicaid eligibility or the last day of the one‑year postpartum period. The subsection also excludes persons whose Medicaid is limited to a pregnancy‑only package, which narrows the population served and focuses the option on full‑benefit enrollees.
Qualification standards for maternity health homes and teams
The Secretary must issue minimum standards, but the statute lists required capabilities: coordinating timely access to maternity and specialist care, producing individualized and culturally competent care plans, integrating home and community services, coordinating with pediatric and behavioral health providers, and meeting reporting requirements. Practically, States will need to operationalize these standards into certification criteria and verification processes—meaning clinics and teams must document workflows, staffing, HIT capacity, and referral networks to qualify.
Payment treatment, methodologies, and temporary FMAP incentive
Payments to designated providers or maternity health homes are Medicaid‑covered services for matching purposes. States must specify their payment method in the SPA; authorized approaches include PMPM payments, prospective payments for FQHCs/RHCs, or alternate models approved by HHS (including 1115 waiver designs). The statute adds a time‑limited federal incentive: for the first four fiscal quarters after SPA enactment, the federal match on those payments is increased by 15 percentage points (but capped at 90 percent), which aims to offset start‑up costs but creates a cliff when the boost expires.
Coordination requirements, hospital notification, and outreach
States must require Medicaid‑participating hospitals to establish procedures to inform eligible women presenting in emergency departments about maternity health homes and to notify a woman’s enrolled maternity health home of any ED treatment and post‑discharge needs. The SPA must describe provider education and beneficiary outreach plans, including stakeholder participation—this creates an operational obligation for hospitals and community outreach organizations to update intake, discharge, and referral workflows.
Monitoring, health IT use, and reporting obligations
States must present methodologies for tracking inpatient days, total cost of care changes, and use of health IT in their SPA. Providers designated as maternity health homes must report provider identifiers, services offered, and quality metrics to the State; States must submit annual (at minimum) comprehensive reports to HHS containing disaggregated demographics, number of maternity health homes, morbidity/mortality data (with postpartum death timing separated), and payment models used. These provisions create substantial HIT and analytic requirements—States must secure mechanisms for secure data exchange and privacy protection consistent with Medicaid confidentiality rules.
Planning grants, appropriation cap, and definitions
The Secretary is to award planning grants to States beginning October 1, 2025, from a $50 million appropriation to help design SPAs; every applying State is eligible but grant amounts may vary by merit. The law also provides operational definitions—'designated provider,' 'maternity health home,' 'health team,' and a list of services that qualify as pregnancy and postpartum coordinated care—giving States the framework to define participating entities and the scope of reimbursable coordination services.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Pregnant and postpartum Medicaid enrollees (full‑benefit): Gain access to coordinated, continuous care that explicitly covers the pregnancy episode and up to one year postpartum when Medicaid eligibility permits, with integrated referrals to behavioral health and social services.
- Safety‑net providers and community health centers: Can receive Medicaid payments for care coordination and potentially stabilize revenue through PMPM or other payment models; the law explicitly allows FQHCs/RHCs to use prospective payment methodologies.
- Behavioral health and social service organizations: Should see improved referral flow and funding opportunities for integrated services because care plans must incorporate behavioral health and social supports.
- State Medicaid programs: Get a structured tool and temporary federal matching boost to pilot integrated maternal programs and data collection to target maternal morbidity drivers.
- Maternal health data users (policymakers, MMR committees): Will receive standardized, annual state‑level reporting that distinguishes early and late postpartum deaths and links utilization and demographic data for program evaluation.
Who Bears the Cost
- State Medicaid agencies: Face implementation costs (HIT, SPA development, oversight, provider certification) and potential longer‑term budget pressures once the FMAP boost ends, even though initial planning grants and temporary enhanced match partially offset startup expenses.
- Providers designated as maternity health homes: Must meet qualification standards, implement individualized care plans, and comply with new reporting requirements—creating administrative, staffing, and technology costs that may be significant for small practices.
- Hospitals and emergency departments: Must add intake and notification procedures and perform culturally and linguistically appropriate outreach, which requires training and process changes.
- CMS and federal oversight entities: Will need to process approvals, issue standards and guidance, and manage the planning grant program and incoming state reports—an unfunded workload increase at the federal level.
- Community‑based workers (unless reimbursed consistently): May expand service delivery without guaranteed sustained payment mechanisms unless States explicitly include doula/community worker reimbursement in their payment methodology.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between establishing a tailored, data‑driven care coordination model that can reduce maternal morbidity (which requires up‑front investment, cross‑sector data sharing, and sustained financing) and the political and fiscal reality that the bill provides only temporary federal match incentives and broad state discretion—improving outcomes demands resources and standardization that many states may be unwilling or unable to commit without a longer‑term federal funding promise.
The statute is a state option—not a mandate—so its impact depends on state uptake; that design preserves federalism but guarantees unequal access across states. The temporary 15 percentage point FMAP bump for the first four fiscal quarters creates an initial incentive, but it does not provide a sustainable federal funding commitment beyond that window.
States that rely on the enhance to underwrite start‑up costs could face a sharp fiscal transition when the boost expires.
The bill gives States wide discretion on payment models and on how to certify providers, which supports local innovation but risks inconsistent incentives. A PMPM may favor prevention and coordination, while alternative prospective or waiver models could generate different utilization patterns.
The reporting and HIT requirements aim to improve measurement but could create meaningful privacy, interoperability, and administrative burdens—and the statute leaves several operational decisions to future CMS guidance (for example, how granular demographic disaggregation must be and how to reconcile SPA reports with existing maternal mortality review data). Finally, integrating non‑licensed community providers (doulas, community health workers) is permitted but the bill does not prescribe direct reimbursement rules for those roles, leaving payment and credentialing decisions to States.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.