This bill amends Title II of the Social Security Act to tilt benefits toward workers with long, low-wage careers and to create a modest ‘longevity’ increase for beneficiaries whose eligibility dates are long in the past. It also extends child’s benefits to full-time post‑secondary students under age 26 and changes how earnings above the contribution-and-benefit base are treated for both payroll taxation and the benefit formula.
Finally, the bill raises payroll tax rates (including self-employment taxes) and temporarily taxes portions of earnings above the contribution base to help finance the changes.
The package mixes benefit-side reforms (new special minimum rules, a long-term eligibility increase, a third bend point in the PIA, and an extension of dependent benefits) with revenue-side adjustments (higher OASDI tax rates and a phased schedule for counting/taxing earnings above the contribution base). It also specifies that the new benefit increases will not count as income or resources for means-tested programs, limiting downstream eligibility effects at the state and federal level.
At a Glance
What It Does
Rewrites the special minimum rule for lifetime low earners to tie a floor to an annual poverty-related dollar amount scaled by years worked; creates a longevity increase for beneficiaries who have been eligible for many years; extends child’s benefits to include full-time post‑secondary students under age 26; inserts a new PIA bend point that captures AIME above the contribution-and-benefit base; and adjusts payroll and self-employment tax obligations while phasing in and then phasing out taxation of earnings above the benefit base.
Who It Affects
Lifetime low earners and caregivers with many credited quarters; long‑term beneficiaries with early eligibility dates; dependent children who are full‑time post‑secondary students; higher‑earning employees and self‑employed persons with remuneration above the contribution-and-benefit base; employers required to withhold and report increased payroll tax rates; and the Social Security Administration (SSA) for new eligibility verifications and benefit computations.
Why It Matters
The bill redistributes benefits toward households with long, low-wage careers and toward long-tenured beneficiaries while raising program revenue through broader payroll taxation and a temporary carve‑in of earnings above the traditional cap. For benefits administration, it adds new eligibility definitions and indexed dollar floors that will change PIA calculations and verification practices, and it alters the long‑term financing mix of OASDI.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Section-by-section, the bill rewrites critical parts of Title II calculations and the tax rules that feed Social Security. The special minimum for lifetime low earners is restructured so that an individual’s primary insurance amount cannot fall below an ‘applicable percentage’ of a poverty‑linked annual amount; that applicable percentage rises with the total credited years of work.
The bill defines years of work using a combination of quarters-of-coverage (converted by a 1/4 factor) and up to five years of credited child‑care time for low‑income caregivers, and it ties the dollar anchor to the 2025 poverty guideline then indexes it to the national average wage index thereafter.
The bill also creates a separate, longevity‑based increase for beneficiaries who have been eligible for many years. SSA must treat a beneficiary as ‘qualified’ for the bonus if a calendar year begins at least 16 years after the individual’s applicable eligibility date; the law scales a beneficiary’s bonus by the number of years between eligibility and the year of payment.
The statute describes how to compute the underlying ‘full increase’ (using a putative PIA based on the national average wage index) and provides special rules for spouse, survivor, and other auxiliary benefits so the boost allocates consistently across benefit types.Dependents’ coverage rules are expanded to include full‑time post‑secondary students under age 26; the bill adopts the Higher Education Act’s definition of a post‑secondary institution and creates short transition rules for gaps between secondary and post‑secondary attendance. For benefit computation, the PIA formula gains an extra segment for average indexed monthly earnings above the contribution-and-benefit base, and the bill specifies how that segment’s threshold will be set initially and indexed thereafter.On the revenue side, the bill amends the Internal Revenue Code and the Social Security Act to (1) require withholding and taxation of a portion of remuneration that exceeds the contribution-and-benefit base under a temporary schedule, (2) make parallel adjustments to the self‑employment tax calculation, and (3) raise employee, employer, and self‑employment tax rates to a higher long‑run level.
Most of the operative provisions take effect for remuneration, taxable years, or benefit applications after 2025. Finally, the legislation instructs that any benefit increases from these provisions should be disregarded as income or resources for means‑tested federal, state, and local programs.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Special minimum: for individuals with 11–30+ years counted, the bill sets a sliding floor equal to an ‘applicable percentage’ of 1/12 of a poverty‑linked annual dollar amount; the applicable percentage starts at 36.7% for 11 years and scales to 100% at 30 or more years.
Longevity increase: beneficiaries become ‘qualified’ when a calendar year begins at least 16 years after their applicable eligibility date; the full increase base equals 5% of a putative PIA computed on a national‑average‑wage AIME, and the beneficiary receives a fraction (20% at 16 years up to 100% at 20+ years) of that full increase.
Taxing above the base: the bill treats a specified fraction of remuneration and self‑employment earnings above the contribution‑and‑benefit base as taxable for OASDI under a schedule that applies 90% in the first year and phases the fraction down to 0% for calendar years after 2035.
New bend point: the PIA formula gains an extra piece—3% of AIME above the amount established for the new bend point (set equal to the contribution-and-benefit base for the 2026 benchmark and indexed thereafter)—so higher AIME above the base contributes modestly to PIA.
Payroll taxes: employee and employer OASDI rates rise to a higher schedule beginning in 2026 (starting at 6.25% and progressing to 6.50% in later years) and self‑employment rates double those levels (beginning at 12.5%), with the statutory effective date set for remuneration and taxable years after 2025.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Special minimum benefit tied to years worked and poverty guideline
This section replaces the current special minimum floor with a formula that guarantees a PIA floor equal to an applicable percentage of 1/12 of an annual dollar amount anchored to the 2025 poverty guideline. The applicable percentage rises with the legislated count of ‘years of work’ and reaches full value only for long careers. Practically, SSA must compute an individual’s years using quarters of coverage (converted by the statutory 1/4 factor) plus up to five years credited for child care under age 6, then apply the table of percentages to the poverty‑anchored dollar amount and include the result in the PIA computation. The poverty anchor is indexed to the national average wage index after 2026, which means the dollar floor will grow with wages rather than CPI.
Long‑term eligibility increase (longevity bonus)
This new subsection creates an annual increase for beneficiaries whose eligibility dates are many years in the past. SSA will identify ‘qualified beneficiaries’ as those with calendar years beginning at least 16 years after the applicable eligibility date. The statute specifies a multi‑tier table that scales the beneficiary’s increase from a partial share at 16 years up to a full share after a specified threshold. To compute the full increase, the law directs use of a hypothetical PIA based on average indexed monthly earnings equal to a national average wage figure; the final payable increase is a percentage of that full amount and is payable after accounting for other statutory adjustments and reductions. The provision also clarifies how the increase is apportioned when a beneficiary receives multiple monthly insurance benefits and directs that the increase be paid from the OASI trust fund when both titles apply.
Child’s insurance: extend dependent coverage to full‑time post‑secondary students under 26
This set of amendments expands the age ceiling for child’s benefits to cover full‑time post‑secondary students under age 26 and adopts the Higher Education Act’s statutory definition for a post‑secondary educational institution. The bill updates eligibility, termination, and transition rules so SSA can treat short gaps between secondary and post‑secondary attendance as continuous for benefit purposes and requires SSA to accept institution verification in the same way it currently verifies secondary attendance. The effective date limit ties these changes to benefit applications filed after 2025, so SSA will need new verification forms and procedures for student status and enrollment reporting.
Temporary treatment of earnings above the contribution‑and‑benefit base
The bill instructs both the Internal Revenue Code and the Social Security Act to include an ‘applicable percentage’ of remuneration or net self‑employment income in OASDI taxable earnings to the extent that earnings exceed the contribution-and-benefit base for calendar years after 2025. That applicable percentage is defined in a table that phases the fraction from a high starting share down to zero for years after 2035. The change affects withholding, employer reporting, and Schedule SE computations; it also modifies how those earnings count when computing average indexed monthly earnings, because a specified percentage of the excess now enters the AIME calculation under the amended Section 215(e).
New PIA bend point for earnings above the contribution base
To ensure earnings above the contribution-and-benefit base still affect benefits modestly, the bill inserts an additional PIA bracket: a 3% factor on the portion of AIME that exceeds the established threshold (set initially equal to the contribution-and-benefit base for 2026). The law prescribes that the threshold for years after 2026 will be indexed using the national average wage index. For individuals who become newly eligible after 2025, this new bend point alters the weighting of higher AIME amounts in the PIA formula and thus slightly increases benefits for higher‑AIME workers compared with the current two‑bend formula.
Increase in OASDI tax rates for employees, employers, and the self‑employed
This section raises the statutory OASDI tax percentages that apply to wages and self‑employment income. The employee and employer rates are redefined to a new schedule that starts at an elevated percentage for the first year of operation and rises to a specified long‑run rate; the self‑employment tax is set to mirror the combined employee/employer increase (i.e., roughly double the employee rate). The amendments are effective for remuneration received and taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so payroll systems, withholding tables, and self‑employed tax computations will need updates for the new rates.
Non‑application to means‑tested programs
The bill directs that any increase in monthly insurance benefits resulting from these amendments is excluded from consideration as income or resources for eligibility determinations and benefit computations under federal, state, and local means‑tested programs. That carve‑out prevents automatic reductions or eligibility losses in other programs that count income and resources, limiting benefit interactions but requiring administrative guidance to ensure consistent treatment across agencies.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Social Services across all five countries.
Explore Social Services in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Long‑service, low‑wage earners and caregivers — The restructured special minimum raises the PIA floor for people with many credited years (including up to five caregiving years), increasing retirement or disability checks for low‑paid long careers.
- Long‑tenured beneficiaries — Individuals whose applicable eligibility dates are many years old receive an indexed longevity increase that boosts monthly benefits for long‑standing beneficiaries.
- Post‑secondary students who are dependents — Full‑time post‑secondary students under 26 maintain entitlement to child’s insurance benefits, protecting young adults enrolled in college or vocational programs.
- Low‑income households relying on means‑tested assistance — By excluding these Social Security increases from means‑test calculations, beneficiaries can receive the higher Social Security amounts without triggering reduced public assistance benefits.
Who Bears the Cost
- Employees and employers — Payroll tax rate increases raise withholding obligations for workers and payroll costs for employers; both must adapt payroll systems and budget for higher ongoing contributions.
- Self‑employed individuals — The bill raises self‑employment tax liability (effectively the combined employee/employer increase), increasing tax burdens for sole proprietors and independent contractors.
- Higher‑earning workers for a limited period — Portions of remuneration above the contribution base are temporarily counted for taxation and (through the new bend point) for benefit calculation, reducing the net after‑tax gain of very high earners during the phase‑in years.
- Social Security Administration — SSA will face administrative and systems costs to implement new eligibility checks (student verification, caregiving credits), calculate new PIA segments, and process longevity increases and special minimums.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is redistributive: increase benefits for long‑running, low‑income, and long‑tenured beneficiaries (improving adequacy) while financing those gains by increasing widely‑applied payroll tax rates and temporarily counting earnings above the traditional cap (raising costs for many and complicating the tax‑benefit structure). The bill advances benefit equity at the cost of broader payroll burdens and added administrative complexity, forcing a trade‑off between immediate benefit improvements and long‑term simplicity and predictability.
The bill blends targeted benefit increases with program financing that relies on higher payroll contributions and a temporary widening of the taxable base. That creates two sets of implementation challenges.
First, the special minimum and longevity increases require SSA to incorporate new crediting rules (quarters-of-coverage converted via a statutory factor and up to five caregiving years), new indexing rules (poverty guideline anchored then indexed to the national average wage index), and additional verifications (post‑secondary enrollment, caregiving certifications). Each of these operational pieces increases program complexity and will require updates to systems, staff training, and possibly rulemaking to define acceptable documentation and to prevent gaming.
Second, the financing design mixes permanent rate increases with a temporary expansion of taxable earnings above the contribution base that phases to zero after 2035. That structure raises questions about intertemporal fairness and long‑run solvency: the temporary tax base widens in early years to help pay for boosts, but the schedule ends, leaving the program dependent on the higher payroll tax rates and on whether the new bend point meaningfully adds future revenues.
The bill does not include an explicit scoring appendix or transition‑year estimates within the text, so implementing agencies and budget offices will need to produce fiscal analyses to determine the net solvency impact. Finally, the interplay with other indexed adjustments—COLA, wage index movements, and state determinations of means-tested benefits despite the exclusion clause—could produce unintended distributional outcomes if indexing choices diverge from expected wage growth.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.