This bill adds a new Section 512 to the Communications Act of 1934. It makes it unlawful to provide wireless communications devices to someone held in a detention facility, to facilitate bringing such a device into a facility, or for a person in detention to possess one.
The act sets civil and criminal penalties for violations and includes definitions and enforcement provisions. The goal is to reduce contraband electronics that can threaten facility security and complicate investigations.
At a Glance
What It Does
It creates a new prohibition under the Communications Act against providing or possessing wireless devices in detention facilities, and it establishes penalties and definitional parameters.
Who It Affects
Detention facilities, staff, providers, and individuals held in custody—across federal and state jurisdictions.
Why It Matters
It signals a unified federal standard to deter contraband electronics in detention settings, aiming to improve security, safety, and the integrity of facility operations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The END CELLS Act adds a new section to the Communications Act of 1934 that targets wireless devices inside detention facilities. It makes it illegal to give a device to someone in custody, to help bring a device into a facility, or for a detainee to possess such a device, with penalties designed to deter violations.
The bill defines what counts as a wireless device and what a detention facility is, and it sets out clear enforcement rules for penalties when violations occur. It preserves room for lawful investigative activity and allows state authorities to enforce the law within their jurisdictions.
The effective date is after enactment, meaning conduct after the law’s enactment would be subject to these rules. The overarching aim is to close gaps that allow contraband devices to threaten security and to standardize penalties across jurisdictions.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Act adds Section 512 to prohibit providing or possessing wireless devices in detention facilities.
Civil penalties can reach up to $50,000 per violation or per day, with a $1,000,000 cap per single act or continuing violation.
Criminal fines can be up to $50,000 per violation for willful violations.
Penalties have a 2-year statute of limitations for forfeiture actions.
The act applies to conduct after enactment and allows existing state enforcement where applicable.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Section 1 establishes the act’s short title, the Eliminate Non-approved Devices and Contraband Electronics Limiting Links to Society Act (END CELLS Act). It frames the bill’s purpose and scope, signalling the security intent of restricting wireless devices in detention settings.
Prohibiting Acts and Penalties
Section 2 adds a new provision to the Communications Act (Sec. 512) that prohibits providing or attempting to provide wireless devices to detainees, facilitating the introduction of such devices, or detainees possessing devices in violation of federal or state rules. It sets civil forfeiture up to $50,000 per violation or per day, with a $1,000,000 cap for any single act or continuing violation. It also imposes criminal fines up to $50,000 per violation and clarifies that these penalties do not replace imprisonment provisions. The section also confirms that state enforcement remains available and defines key terms like ‘detention facility’ and ‘wireless device.’
Effective Date
Section 3 specifies that the amendment applies to conduct occurring after the enactment date. This creates a forward-looking enforcement regime and clarifies that pre-enactment activity is not subject to the new penalties. The section also preserves the ability of law enforcement to carry out investigative or protective actions as allowed by law.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Justice across all five countries.
Explore Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Detention facility security offices and administrators seeking to reduce contraband and enhance safety, by creating a clear deterrent and enforcement framework.
- Federal and state law enforcement and prosecutors who can leverage the penalties to deter and address illicit device transfers.
- Privately operated and public detention facilities seeking uniform standards across jurisdictions to curb contraband electronics.
- Facility staff and guards who face reduced security incidents involving contraband devices.
Who Bears the Cost
- Detention facilities must allocate resources to enforce the new prohibitions, including training, search protocols, and potential equipment upgrades.
- Individuals and visitors who attempt to provide devices to detainees or who knowingly facilitate introduction may face substantial civil and criminal penalties.
- State and local governments may incur administrative and enforcement costs to administer penalties and coordinate with federal authorities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing the imperatives of security and safety in detention facilities with the risk of over-criminalizing routine or legitimate communication and the practicalities of enforcing a broad new prohibition across diverse jurisdictions.
The bill focuses on deterrence and security by criminalizing the provision and possession of wireless devices inside detention facilities. It raises important questions about the breadth of the definition of “wireless device” and how the statute interacts with lawful communications and attorney-client privilege.
Enforcement complexity across federal and state lines could pose practical challenges, and the penalties–while formidable—must be weighed against due process considerations and the realities of detention environments. The act also preserves existing investigative authorities and state enforcement powers, creating a federal baseline that will require careful calibration with state laws and facility operations.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.