The Bridge Protection Act would amend title 23 to add new requirements for owners of covered bridges—bridges over navigable water built before 1996. It requires owners to conduct vessel collision vulnerability assessments using the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Method II and to submit the results to the Secretary of Transportation.
If an assessed bridge exceeds the risk threshold, the owner must develop and implement a risk reduction plan within one year of the assessment. Starting October 1, 2026, owners who fail to implement the plan become ineligible for federal grants related to that bridge unless the Secretary extends the deadline.
The act also requires integration of assessment results into the National Bridge Inventory and establishes data protections for sensitive information. In addition, it creates an interdisciplinary Bridge Safety Team within DOT and a Bridge Vulnerability Grant Program with up to $500 million authorized for 2026–2030 to support assessments and physical improvements.
At a Glance
What It Does
As a condition for receiving funds under title 23, the Secretary must require owners of covered bridges to conduct vulnerability assessments (AASHTO Method II) and report results. If risk exceeds the threshold, owners must craft and execute a risk reduction plan within a year. The results must be integrated into the National Bridge Inventory, with protection for sensitive data. The act also creates a grant program and a safety team.
Who It Affects
Owners of covered bridges (bridges over navigable water built before 1996), state and local transportation agencies, and DOT program administrators responsible for funding, data integration, and oversight.
Why It Matters
Establishes a uniform safety framework for aging bridges, creates a national vulnerability data resource, and ties federal funding to concrete risk management actions.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill adds a dedicated set of requirements for bridges built before 1996 that span navigable water. First, bridge owners must conduct a vulnerability assessment using a standardized method (AASHTO Method II) and share the results with the Secretary of Transportation.
If the assessment shows the bridge is at risk, the owner must develop and implement a risk reduction plan within one year. Beginning in 2026, failure to carry out the plan makes the bridge ineligible for federal funding unless an extension is granted.
The assessment results must be integrated into the National Bridge Inventory within a year, and the Secretary may withhold sensitive data to protect bridge security.
The act also creates an interdisciplinary Bridge Safety Team within the Department of Transportation to guide, oversee compliance, and maintain a national vulnerability database for bridges. The team would include detailees from the Federal Highway Administration, the Coast Guard, and the Army Corps of Engineers.
A parallel Bridge Vulnerability Grant Program would provide competitive grants to fund assessments and physical improvements to covered bridges, with authorized appropriations of $500 million for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.Together, these provisions aim to improve safety for aging bridge infrastructure, standardize risk assessment across jurisdictions, and ensure that federal dollars are tied to proven risk-reduction actions. The package also clarifies how data is handled to balance transparency with security considerations, and it creates a formal mechanism for ongoing national coordination on bridge vulnerability.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill targets “covered bridges” defined as bridges over navigable water built before 1996.
As a condition for federal funding, owners must conduct vessel collision vulnerability assessments under AASHTO Method II.
If risk thresholds are exceeded, owners must develop and implement a risk reduction plan within 1 year.
From October 1, 2026, failure to implement the risk plan makes the bridge ineligible for federal grants unless extension is granted.
A new DOT interdisciplinary Bridge Safety Team and a Bridge Vulnerability Grant Program (authorized $500 million for 2026–2030) are established.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Requirements for certain bridges
This section adds a new provision to Chapter 1 of title 23. As a condition for receiving federal funds, the owner of a covered bridge must conduct a vessel collision vulnerability assessment using AASHTO Method II and submit the results to the Secretary. If the assessment shows risk above the established threshold, the owner must develop and implement a risk reduction plan within one year. Beginning October 1, 2026, failure to implement the plan makes the owner ineligible for federal grants relating to that bridge unless an extension is granted. The section also requires integration of assessment results into the National Bridge Inventory within one year, with the Secretary allowed to withhold sensitive data to protect bridge security. Finally, the section defines “covered bridge” as a bridge over navigable water built before 1996.
Interdisciplinary Bridge Safety Team
This section directs the Secretary of Transportation to establish an interdisciplinary Bridge Safety Team within DOT to provide guidance, oversee compliance, and maintain a national vulnerability database for bridges. The team will be composed of detailees from the Federal Highway Administration, the Coast Guard, and the Army Corps of Engineers, ensuring cross-agency coordination on bridge risk assessment and safety standards.
Bridge vulnerability grant program
This section creates a competitive grant program to fund assessments and physical improvements for covered bridges. It details application requirements, permissible use of grant funds (conducting assessments or making improvements), and provides an authorization of appropriations totaling $500 million for fiscal years 2026 through 2030. The definition of “covered bridge” is reiterated to align with §180.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Infrastructure across all five countries.
Explore Infrastructure in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State and local transportation agencies that own covered bridges gain clearer risk-management obligations and access to targeted federal grants for assessments and improvements.
- The U.S. Department of Transportation and its interdisciplinary Bridge Safety Team benefit from a formalized, centralized framework for risk data, oversight, and national coordination on bridge vulnerability.
- Bridge owners and operators who actively pursue assessments and implement risk-reduction plans receive funding support and a standardized pathway to safer infrastructure.
- Bridge safety professionals (inspectors, engineers, and consultants) engage in a funded, standardized workflow for vulnerability assessments and improvements.
- Bridge users and nearby communities gain safety through better-informed upgrades and documented risk-reduction efforts.
Who Bears the Cost
- Bridge owners of covered bridges bear the direct costs of conducting vulnerability assessments and implementing risk-reduction measures.
- The federal government commits up to $500 million in grant funding for 2026–2030 to support assessments and improvements, plus ongoing administrative costs.
- State and local transportation agencies incur costs related to data integration into the National Bridge Inventory and compliance oversight.
- Contractors and consultants engaged to perform assessments and improvements incur professional costs and project management expenses.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing rapid, uniform safety upgrades for an aging, dispersed bridge stock with the realities of funding, administrative capacity, and data security.
The bill creates a centralized, risk-based framework for aging bridges, but it also imposes a substantial compliance burden on local and state agencies. The reliance on the AASHTO Method II for vulnerability assessments raises questions about consistency and availability of qualified evaluators.
Data integration into the National Bridge Inventory could improve decision-making and safety, yet the provision to withhold sensitive data introduces a trade-off between transparency and security. The risk-threshold mechanism ties federal funding to timely mitigation actions, but the one-year window and potential extension raise concerns about enforceability and the pace of safety upgrades.
Finally, the grant program’s size and duration depend on appropriations, which could affect project scoping, prioritization, and long-term maintenance planning.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.