The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to partner with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Hawaii to address Rapid Ohia Death, establishing a framework for ongoing collaboration across agencies and with local stakeholders. It codifies sustained actions in research, ungulate management, and forest restoration, with an emphasis on preventing spread and restoring native forests.
The act seeks to ensure that interagency efforts and funding remain in place to confront the disease over time, including engagement with private landowners when land use policies intersect with control areas.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Interior Department, via USGS and the Forest Service, will maintain research into Rapid Ohia Death vectors and transmission. The Interior, Agriculture, Hawaii, and local communities will coordinate ungulate management in disease-control areas on federal, state, and private lands with landowner consent. The Forest Service, acting through the Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry, will provide financial assistance to prevent spread and restore native forests.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies (Interior, USGS, FWS) and the Forest Service; the State of Hawaii; private landowners within Rapid Ohia Death control areas who consent to management actions; local stakeholders and the Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry.
Why It Matters
It formalizes long-term, cross-jurisdictional actions that address disease vectors, habitat restoration, and wildlife impacts, ensuring ongoing resources and coordination are in place to protect Hawaii’s forests and communities.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The act establishes a framework for sustained federal-state collaboration to address Rapid Ohia Death in Hawaii. It defines Rapid Ohia Death and confirms Hawaii as the affected state.
The Interior Department will partner with the Agriculture Department and the State of Hawaii to tackle the disease, continuing critical research into how the disease spreads and how it can be controlled. A key element is ungulate management in disease-affected areas, conducted with the consent of private landowners, across federal, state, and private lands.
The Forest Service, through the Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry, will continue to provide financial support to prevent the disease’s spread and to restore Hawaii’s native forests, and it will receive staff and infrastructure funding for ongoing research.
Overall, the bill codifies a multi-agency, landowner-inclusive approach that prioritizes scientific understanding, practical forest management, and restoration funding. By clarifying roles and funding streams, it aims to sustain disease control efforts beyond a single fiscal year and to align federal action with Hawaii’s land-management realities.
The act explicitly links research, restoration, and on-the-ground management to a coordinated strategy designed to protect forest health and local livelihoods.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The act directs the Interior Department to partner with the Agriculture Department and Hawaii to address Rapid Ohia Death.
It requires continued research on vectors and transmission by the USGS and the Forest Service’s Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry.
It mandates coordinated ungulate management in Rapid Ohia Death control areas on federal, state, and private land with landowner consent.
It authorizes financial assistance to prevent spread and restore native forests, and funds the Pacific Islands Forestry Institute for ongoing research.
It defines Rapid Ohia Death and Hawaii for the purposes of the act.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Establishes the act’s short title as the Continued Rapid Ohia Death Response Act of 2025, signaling a continuing federal-state effort to address the disease.
Definitions
Defines Rapid Ohia Death as the disease caused by Ceratocystis fimbriata affecting Metrosideros polymorpha and designates the State as Hawaii. These definitions anchor the scope of authority and the target of interventions.
Collaboration
Requires the Secretary of the Interior to partner with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State to address Rapid Ohia Death, creating an interagency and intergovernmental collaboration framework for coordinated action.
Transmission Research
directs the Interior (through USGS) and the Forest Service (Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry) to continue research on vectors and transmission, ensuring ongoing scientific guidance for control measures.
Ungulate Management
Mandates continued interagency collaboration to manage ungulates in Rapid Ohia Death control areas on Federal, State, and private land, with consent of private landowners, integrating wildlife management with disease control.
Restoration and Research
Requires the Forest Service to provide financial assistance to prevent spread and restore native forests, and to supply staff and infrastructure funding to the Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry for continued disease research.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Institute of Pacific Islands Forestry (receives ongoing funding and staffing to conduct research)
- State of Hawaii’s forestry and natural resources agencies (benefit from coordinated actions and funding streams)
- Federal science and land-management agencies (USGS, FWS, Forest Service) benefiting from a defined collaboration framework and role clarity
- Private landowners within Rapid Ohia Death control areas (benefit from integrated management and consent-based engagement)
- Local forest-dependent communities relying on Hawaii’s native forests (benefit from restoration and disease control)
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies (Interior, USGS, FWS, Forest Service) incur ongoing program and staffing costs
- State of Hawaii bears coordination and potential implementation costs within state lands and programs
- Private landowners may face costs related to participation and consent-based management on their properties
- Funding must be sourced for restoration and research programs, with long-term financial commitments needed
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing aggressive disease control and ecosystem restoration with private property rights and voluntary participation, while maintaining durable funding and interagency coordination.
The bill anchors a long-term, interagency approach, but several tensions deserve scrutiny. Relying on private landowner consent for ungulate management could slow or unevenly apply interventions across private lands, creating gaps in coverage if landowner participation is voluntary rather than mandatory.
The act also hinges on sustained funding; if appropriations wane, the long-term research, restoration, and management commitments may falter, limiting effectiveness. While the act clarifies roles across agencies, actual coordination will require robust memoranda of understanding and streamlined interagency processes to avoid duplicative work and jurisdictional friction, especially where land ownership and land-use planning intersect with conservation actions.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.