The bill instructs the Secretary of Labor to amend the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) so that dual-role firefighters—those who serve as emergency medical technicians (EMTs) or paramedics in addition to firefighting duties—are explicitly captured within firefighter occupational categories. It aims to close a gap BLS currently identifies as causing undercounts of EMS personnel when those workers’ primary employer role is firefighting.
Accurate occupational counts matter because BLS statistics feed preparedness planning, grant formulas, workforce development programs, and public-health surveillance. Narrowing a known classification blind spot could shift official employment tallies and change the evidence base used by federal, state, and local decisionmakers for resource allocation and training needs assessments.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires the Department of Labor to change SOC guidance for firefighter occupations so that roles combining firefighting with EMS duties are listed and treated as distinct occupations within that series. It also asks the Secretary to brief Congress on prior classification changes and implementation steps.
Who It Affects
The Bureau of Labor Statistics and the analysts who code occupational data, local and volunteer fire departments with dual-role personnel, emergency medical service agencies that rely on BLS counts, and planners and grant administrators who use those datasets.
Why It Matters
SOC categories determine how workers are classified across many federal surveys, so this is an upstream change with downstream effects on workforce statistics, eligibility evidence for grants, disaster preparedness modeling, and research into EMS capacity.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill directs the Secretary of Labor to revise the descriptive language for firefighter occupations in the SOC so that firefighter roles that also function as emergency medical technicians or paramedics are captured as distinct, detailed occupations. Concretely, it adds a set of detailed occupation entries under the firefighter series so that reporting and coding instructions can identify ‘‘firefighter/EMTs’’ and ‘‘firefighter/paramedics’’ rather than leaving those workers aggregated or classified elsewhere.
To make that operational, the Department will update the SOC manual and the coding guidance used by BLS staff and contractors. That change will cascade into the coding rules applied in BLS surveys (for example, the Occupational Employment Statistics program, Current Population Survey occupational coding, and other administrative data crosswalks).
Practically, survey coders will need new lookups and potentially new interview prompts; employer-reported data may be recoded; and BLS will have to publish crosswalks that bridge pre-change and post-change classifications so analysts can compare time series.The bill also directs a report to Congress describing a prior 2015 action that separated EMTs and paramedics in the EMS occupational series and to explain how the new firefighter-series revisions are being implemented. The legislation leaves the change as an administrative/statistical reclassification—there is no licensing or certification requirement imposed on states or personnel, and it does not change scope-of-practice rules for medical care.Because SOC revisions affect multiple datasets, BLS will likely supply technical documentation and transition guidance.
Users of employment statistics should expect a short-term disruption in comparability: counts of EMS practitioners may increase in firefighter-series tables while counts in the separate EMS occupation series may decline or be redistributed. Agencies that rely on those counts for funding, planning, or credentialing should plan to adjust analytic baselines when the new classifications appear.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires adding distinct detailed occupations under the firefighter SOC series so dual-role firefighter‑EMTs and firefighter‑paramedics can be coded and reported separately from other firefighting roles.
BLS will need to update SOC documentation, coding tools, and inter‑survey crosswalks so coders and automated systems can assign the new firefighter/EMS categories correctly.
The statute treats the change as a classification reform only: it does not alter licensing, clinical scope, or certification requirements for EMTs or paramedics.
Reclassifying dual-role personnel will create a break in occupational time series requiring researchers and grant administrators to use bridge tables or adjusted baselines for trend analysis.
The bill mandates a congressional report explaining how BLS expanded EMS categories previously and how it will implement the new firefighter-series revisions, supplying a paper trail for accountability and audit.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title: 'EMS Counts Act'
This is the naming provision; it frames the statute’s intent but carries no substantive operational requirement. In practice it signals Congress’ objective that BLS occupational statistics better reflect the EMS-capable workforce.
Findings on EMS roles and counting problems
The findings summarize why Congress perceives a problem—dual-role firefighters can be missed in EMS headcounts—and cite EMS’s role in disaster and public-health responses. While not legally operative, these findings set the policy rationale BLS will attach to its revision and may be used by agencies and stakeholders when interpreting the scope of any implementing guidance.
SOC revision requirement for firefighter occupations
This is the operative change: the Secretary must revise the broad description under the firefighter occupational series to include multiple detailed occupations (a separate set for firefighter/EMTs and firefighter/paramedics, plus an all‑other category). That forces an administrative update in the SOC manual and requires BLS to adopt new coding protocols so those dual-role workers are identified in future tabulations.
Reporting requirement to Congress
The Secretary must deliver a report that explains how BLS expanded EMS-related categories previously and how it implemented the new firefighter-series revisions. The report requirement creates a formal record of BLS’s method choices and provides Congress with information to assess whether the classification change addresses the counting gaps Congress highlighted.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Employment across all five countries.
Explore Employment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Dual-role firefighter/EMTs and firefighter/paramedics — they will appear explicitly in BLS occupational statistics, improving visibility of their EMS responsibilities for workforce studies and potential program targeting.
- Emergency preparedness and public‑health planners — more accurate headcounts give planners better inputs for surge-capacity modeling and for allocating training or equipment resources.
- Researchers and labor analysts — clearer occupational granularity improves the validity of studies on EMS capacity, workforce shortages, and the role of firefighters in emergency care.
- Federal and state grant administrators — programs that use BLS or SOC-derived counts to set eligibility or prioritize awards will have a finer-grained dataset to base decisions on.
Who Bears the Cost
- Bureau of Labor Statistics — must allocate staff time to rewrite SOC descriptions, update coding tools, publish crosswalks, and support users during the transition.
- Local, volunteer, and combination fire departments — may face increased reporting or clarification requests from coders or survey instruments when employers or employees are reclassified.
- Analysts and program offices that maintain historical comparability — will need to produce bridged series, recalibrate baselines, and possibly revisit prior analyses used for funding or policy decisions.
- Small research shops and non‑profits — may incur short-term costs to retune models and data processes to account for classification changes and disrupted time series.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits the goal of producing a more accurate, granular count of EMS-capable workers against the competing need for continuity and comparability in national employment statistics; solving the counting gap improves policy inputs but risks introducing disruptive breaks and administrative burdens that can themselves complicate decisionmaking.
Two implementation challenges stand out. First, changing SOC language is an upstream statistical fix that can improve visibility but also creates discontinuities across multiple BLS products.
Analysts relying on time series will need bridge tables and careful documentation; without them, agencies that use historical thresholds for funding or planning could misinterpret apparent workforce changes as real trends. Second, the bill sets an administrative expectation but does not provide funding.
BLS will have to absorb the workload within existing resources, which could compress the depth of outreach, coder training, or the quality of technical documentation produced on the new categories.
There is also an unresolved question about the mechanics of reclassification: whether the change will be implemented primarily through new guidance to coders and automated coding updates, or whether BLS will retroactively re-tabulate existing survey microdata. Retroactive re‑tabulation would preserve comparability but is resource‑intensive; leaving previous estimates as-is and only applying the new categories prospectively preserves resources but forces users to manage the break.
Finally, the statute fixes classification language but does not harmonize state reporting systems or employer payroll codes, so local reporting practices could lag behind the federal change and limit its immediate usefulness for some programs.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.