The Exported Carbon Emissions Report Act of 2025 directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to collect, calculate, and publish information on carbon dioxide and methane emissions tied to fossil fuels exported from the United States. It requires a ten-year retrospective comparison with emissions occurring within U.S. borders, providing a clear view of how export activities affect overall greenhouse gas outcomes.
The data must be produced using best available science, align with international accounting standards, and be publicly accessible through the EPA's website. The act also calls for consultations with the Energy Information Administration and the International Energy Agency to ensure consistency and credibility.
At a Glance
What It Does
EPA must, within 180 days of enactment and annually thereafter, collect, calculate, and publish CO2 and methane emissions for the prior ten calendar years. It compares emissions within U.S. boundaries to emissions outside those boundaries that are linked to U.S.-produced or refined fossil fuels exported abroad.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies (EPA, EIA, IEA), fossil fuel producers and exporters, export market analysts, researchers, and policymakers who rely on cross-border emission data.
Why It Matters
This creates a standardized, transparent baseline for understanding the climate impact of U.S. fossil fuel exports and aligns domestic reporting with international accounting practices.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill directs the EPA to build a public, year-by-year record of greenhouse gas emissions associated with fossil fuels produced or refined in the United States and subsequently exported, focusing on carbon dioxide and methane. It requires a ten-year historical lens, so the public and policymakers can see how export activity compares to emissions generated within the United States.
Emissions data must come from the best available science—including direct measurements and disclosures from other governments—and be collected in a way that conforms to established greenhouse gas accounting standards, such as the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
Implementation relies on collaboration: the EPA must consult the Energy Information Administration and the International Energy Agency to ensure data consistency and credibility. The information collected under this act will be widely accessible, including on the EPA’s website, so researchers, regulators, industry players, and the public can analyze trends, benchmarking, and potential policy implications.
The act defines fossil fuels as coal, oil, and natural gas and frames data around both domestic emissions from all stages of fossil fuel use and export-related emissions emitted outside U.S. borders during leakage and combustion of fuels produced or refined in the United States and exported abroad.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires EPA to publish within 180 days after enactment and annually thereafter a ten-year comparison of domestic versus exported fossil fuel emissions.
Exports data cover CO2 and methane attributed to leakage and combustion of fuels produced or refined in the U.S. and then exported.
EPA must use best available science, including direct monitoring and foreign disclosures, and adhere to international accounting standards (GHG Protocol).
The implementation requires coordination with the EIA and the IEA.
Public data must be widely accessible, including on the EPA website.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This section designates the act as the Exported Carbon Emissions Report Act of 2025 and sets the formal basis for the information collection and publication contemplated in Section 2.
Comparison of domestic and exported carbon emissions
Not later than 180 days after enactment and annually thereafter, the EPA shall collect, calculate, and publish information for the previous ten calendar years on two sets of emissions: (1) total CO2 and methane emissions within the United States (including U.S. territories) from extraction, processing, transportation, combustion, and other uses of fossil fuels; and (2) total CO2 and methane emissions outside U.S. boundaries resulting from leakage and combustion of fossil fuels produced or refined in the United States and exported.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- EPA and related federal agencies gain a clear, standardized data stream to inform regulatory and policy decisions.
- Policy researchers, universities, and think tanks receive a robust dataset for climate and energy analyses.
- Environmental NGOs and civil society groups acquire verifiable data to assess the climate impact of U.S. fossil fuel exports.
- International partners and the public benefit from consistent, comparable emissions accounting that supports global climate transparency.
- Energy market analysts and industry stakeholders obtain a framework for benchmarking and forecasting export-related impacts.
Who Bears the Cost
- EPA will incur administrative costs to collect, verify, and publish the data and maintain the public database.
- Fossil fuel producers and exporters may face additional reporting expectations and reputational considerations from public data releases.
- Data verification and cross-border data integration may require investments in data infrastructure and interagency coordination.
- IT infrastructure and public-facing data presentation for the EPA website will require ongoing funding and maintenance.
- Coordination with international bodies (EIA, IEA) may entail agreement processes and bandwidth for data sharing.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between pursuing transparent, internationally comparable export-emissions data and the practical challenges of measuring and harmonizing cross-border emissions across jurisdictions with varying data quality and standards.
The bill leverages best-available science and international standards to produce a transparent accounting of export-related emissions. However, achieving high-quality cross-border data is challenging given differing national reporting regimes and the historical quality of emissions data.
The ten-year retrospective scope may stress data availability and consistency, especially for periods before widespread adoption of uniform reporting standards. If data gaps persist, the EPA will face trade-offs between completeness and timeliness.
The act intentionally centers on transparency and benchmarking rather than prescribing policy changes, but the public release of export-emissions data could influence market behavior and policymaking.
In sum, the act seeks a credible, comparable view of how U.S. fossil fuel exports contribute to global greenhouse gas totals, while recognizing the practical limits of cross-jurisdictional emissions accounting and the potential implications for trade and industry.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.