The bill amends title 38, United States Code, to prohibit smoking on the premises of any facility of the Veterans Health Administration. It defines what counts as smoking and what qualifies as a VHA facility, and it makes conforming amendments to the statute while repealing a provision of the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992.
The overall aim is to create a nationwide, on-site smoke-free environment within VHA properties and operations.
At a Glance
What It Does
Prohibits any person from smoking on the premises of any VHA facility. It also defines ‘smoke’ to include traditional tobacco products and electronic nicotine delivery systems, and it clarifies which buildings and lands qualify as VHA facilities under the new rule.
Who It Affects
Directly affects veterans, patients, residents, employees, contractors, and visitors at VHA facilities—essentially everyone on VHA property.
Why It Matters
Establishes a clear, nationwide standard for smoke-free VHA spaces, reducing secondhand exposure and aligning VHA policy with broader public health goals.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill is a straightforward policy change: it sets a universal prohibition on smoking on any land or building that is part of the Veterans Health Administration. The prohibition applies to a broad set of people on VHA premises, including veterans, patients, residents, employees, contractors, and visitors.
To ensure comprehensive coverage, the bill defines what counts as smoking and what counts as a VHA facility. Specifically, smoking includes the use of traditional tobacco products as well as electronic nicotine delivery systems such as e-cigarettes and vape pens.
The practitioner should note that the scope of “premises” includes the physical land and facilities under VHA jurisdiction, but it excludes those under General Services Administration control. In addition to the prohibition, the bill makes conforming amendments to the U.S. Code: it updates the table of sections to replace the old 1715 entry with the new prohibition, and it repeals Section 526 of the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992.
The text does not specify any exemptions or penalties within the bill, leaving enforcement and potential transitional needs to be addressed through VHA procedures and future rulemaking.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill imposes a nationwide smoking ban on all VHA facilities.
Smoke is defined to include both traditional tobacco products and electronic nicotine delivery systems.
A 'facility of the Veterans Health Administration' includes land and buildings under VHA jurisdiction, not those under GSA control.
Conforming amendments update the table of sections to reflect the new prohibition in Section 1715.
Section 526 of the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992 is repealed.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Prohibition on smoking in facilities of the Veterans Health Administration
This section amends 38 U.S.C. §1715 to establish a blanket ban on smoking on the premises of any VHA facility. It defines who is covered by the prohibition (everyone on site, including veterans, patients, residents, Department employees, contractors, and visitors) and what counts as smoking (tobacco products and electronic nicotine delivery systems). It also defines the scope of what qualifies as a VHA facility (land or buildings under VHA jurisdiction and VHA control) and clarifies that facilities not under GSA control fall under the ban.
Conforming amendments—Table of Sections
The table of sections at the beginning of Chapter 17 is amended to replace the existing entry for Section 1715 with a new entry: “1715. Prohibition on smoking in facilities of the Veterans Health Administration.” This ensures the statute text aligns with the new prohibition across the code.
Repeal of Veterans Health Care Act of 1992, Section 526
The bill repeals Section 526 of the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992. The repeal removes whatever authorities or protections that section provided, as part of the statutory realignment accompanying the new smoking prohibition. The impact of this repeal on related benefits or program authorities is not detailed in the bill text.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Veterans and patients at VHA facilities who experience reduced exposure to secondhand smoke and a cleaner healthcare environment.
- VHA clinicians and staff who benefit from a clearer, uniform smoking policy and reduced on-site health risks.
- VHA facility administrators and compliance officers who gain a straightforward governance framework for enforcement and facility management.
- Family members and visitors to VHA facilities who gain health protection while on-site.
Who Bears the Cost
- Smokers who visit or work at VHA facilities will need to abstain on-site, potentially changing routines and requiring cessation supports.
- VHA security and enforcement personnel who will need to monitor compliance and address violations.
- VHA budgets and facilities teams may incur costs for signage, training, and enforcement-related activities.
- Contractors and outside vendors operating on VHA premises must comply with the ban, which may involve operational adjustments and monitoring.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between a robust, universal health-protective ban and the practical challenges of enforcing a prohibition across diverse facilities and populations, without explicit exemption pathways or transitional guidance.
The bill delivers a clear public health benefit by removing on-site smoking from VHA facilities, but it raises practical questions about enforcement, exemptions, and transition support. The current text does not outline penalties, enforcement mechanisms, or any carve-outs for medical necessity or nicotine-replacement strategies, nor does it specify designated outdoor areas or phased timelines.
In practice, implementation will depend on VHA security, facility policies, staff training, and coordination with local law enforcement when necessary. The repeal of Section 526 adds another layer of policy interaction that may affect related veterans’ health care authorities or funding streams, though the bill itself does not spell out these consequences.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.