HB3862 amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to broaden who can receive financial assistance from state water pollution control revolving funds (SRFs). It adds an eligibility category for qualified nonprofit entities to fund construction, acquisition, or improvements to treatment works, and to support other activities described in the existing c(1)-(10).
The bill also creates a special rule for privately owned treatment works, authorizing funds to assist with improvements to those works, construction of other privately owned works, conservation and reuse measures, energy efficiency, and security upgrades, subject to a key limitation: subsidies must primarily benefit the individuals served, not shareholders. It also imposes a prohibition on additional subsidization for these new categories under subsection (i)(3)(E) to prevent double-dipping, aligning the new authorities with the existing subsidy framework.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds new eligibility under Section 603 to allow qualified nonprofit entities to receive SRF financing for treatment works construction, acquisition, or improvements, and for other activities described in the statute. It also establishes a special rule for privately owned treatment works (Section 603(l)) authorizing subsidies for a broad set of activities, with a prohibition on additional subsidization (603(i)(3)(E)).
Who It Affects
Qualified nonprofit entities determined by the Administrator, privately owned treatment works and their owners/operators, state SRF programs, and communities served by treatment works.
Why It Matters
Expands the pool of entities eligible for SRF funding, potentially accelerating water infrastructure upgrades and efficiency gains while imposing safeguards to ensure subsidies benefit customers rather than shareholders.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill changes who can access SRF funds by adding a new eligibility category for qualified nonprofit entities. These nonprofits can receive assistance for constructing, acquiring, or improving treatment works, as well as other described activities, expanding the reach of SRF financing beyond traditional public entities.
In addition, the bill creates a special rule for privately owned treatment works, allowing funds to be used for improvements to those works, construction of other privately owned works, and conservation, energy efficiency, security, and related measures. These private-works subsidies must primarily benefit the people served by the facility, not the shareholders.
Finally, the bill prohibits any additional subsidization under the SRF for these new categories to prevent duplicative subsidies. Implementation is overseen by the State administering the SRF, which will determine eligibility and ensure compliance with the new limits.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds a new eligible recipient: qualified nonprofit entities for SRF financing.
Private owners of treatment works can receive subsidies for a broad set of activities (A-F in the l(1) list).
Subsidies under the new nonprofit and private-works authorities are prohibited from being duplicative or subsidizing shareholders (iable under i(3)(E)).
Subsidies to privately owned treatment works must primarily benefit those served by the facility, not the owners.
Funding administration and beneficiary determinations are to be made by the state instrumentality administering the SRF, per the bill’s structure.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Nonprofit eligibility added
The bill adds a new paragraph (13) to subsection (c) of Section 603, allowing a qualified nonprofit entity, as determined by the Administrator, to receive assistance for the construction, acquisition, or improvements to a treatment works, or for any other activity described in paragraphs (1) through (10). This expands SRF eligibility beyond existing eligible entities and ties nonprofit access to the Administrator’s designation of qualification.
Ineligibility for additional subsidization
The bill adds an ESubsection to (i)(3) stating that a State may not provide additional subsidization under this subsection to a qualified nonprofit entity for assistance described in subsection (c)(13) or to the owner or operator of a privately owned treatment works for assistance described in subsection (l). This creates a guardrail to prevent duplication of subsidies across the new categories.
Special rule for privately owned treatment works
This new subsection authorizes, in any fiscal year, funds to be used to provide financial assistance to the owner or operator of a privately owned treatment works for a range of activities: improvements to the privately owned work, construction/improvement of another privately owned work, water conservation or reuse measures, energy-efficiency measures, security improvements, and any other activity described in paragraph (1)-(10) of subsection (c). The section defines the scope of eligible activities and makes clear that such subsidies are allowed under the SRF program.
Limitation on benefits to served individuals
Financial assistance under this subsection is limited to activities that primarily and directly benefit the individuals or entities served by the privately owned treatment works, and not the shareholders or owners of the treatment works. This limitation is determined by the instrumentality of the State administering the SRF, ensuring beneficiaries are the end users rather than owners.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Qualified nonprofit entities—gain access to SRF financing for treatment works projects and related activities (construction, acquisition, improvements).
- Communities served by nonprofit-supported or privately owned treatment works—benefit from improvements in water infrastructure, conservation, energy efficiency, and security upgrades.
- Privately owned treatment works’ owners/operators—can receive subsidies for a broad set of eligible activities under the private-works rule (subject to the benefit-to-customers requirement).
- State SRF program administrators—gain authority to evaluate eligibility of nonprofits and implement the new rules within existing SRF frameworks.
Who Bears the Cost
- State SRF administrators—administer additional oversight, eligibility determinations, and compliance monitoring.
- Qualified nonprofit entities—face new eligibility criteria and reporting obligations to access SRF funds.
- Privately owned treatment works—may incur costs to undertake eligible improvements and to ensure that subsidies primarily benefit served individuals (as required).
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between broadening access to SRF funding (to nonprofit entities and privately owned treatment works) and maintaining strict beneficiary safeguards so that subsidies truly serve the public and end users, not the owners or shareholders.
The bill’s expansion of SRF eligibility raises policy questions about who benefits from public funding and how subsidies are allocated. While widening access to SRF financing could accelerate critical water infrastructure upgrades, the new nonprofit and private-works pathways require robust oversight to ensure that subsidies flow to customers and communities rather than to owners or shareholders.
The prohibition on additional subsidization for these new paths is intended to prevent double-dipping, but it also requires precise administrative implementation to avoid gaps or confusion across different subsections. Practical questions remain about defining “qualified nonprofit entities,” assessing “primarily benefit” for served individuals, and coordinating between state SRF instruments and the new authorities.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.