HB3935 amends Section 404(c) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to establish a defined period of prohibition on the specification of any defined area as a disposal site for dredged or fill material. The period runs from the moment an applicant submits all information required to complete a permit application to the date the Secretary issues the permit.
The amendments apply to permit applications submitted after enactment, with the aim of reducing regulatory uncertainty and aligning decision points with information readiness. The bill preserves the general framework of notice and opportunity for public hearings, but anchors the prohibition window to when information is complete rather than to an undefined stage in the process.
At a Glance
What It Does
Adds a new period-of-prohibition to Section 404(c) that begins when an applicant submits all required information and ends when a permit is issued, during which the Administrator may prohibit or withdraw a disposal-site specification.
Who It Affects
Applies to applicants seeking Section 404 permits for dredged or fill material; affects the Army Corps of Engineers and other permitting agencies, project sponsors, and environmental review teams.
Why It Matters
Provides a predictable, information-driven timeline for prohibitions and withdrawals of disposal-site specifications, reducing uncertainty for project planning and financing.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill makes a targeted change to how disposal-site decisions under the Clean Water Act are timed. It creates a defined window—the Period of Prohibition—within which the Administrator may prohibit the specification or withdrawal of a defined area as a disposal site for dredged or fill material.
This window starts when the applicant has submitted all information required to complete the permit application and ends when the Secretary issues the permit. The change is limited to applications submitted after enactment and is intended to reduce the ambiguity that can slow or complicate permitting.
Public notice and hearings provisions remain, but the prohibition is now tied to information readiness rather than unbounded delay. In short, the bill tries to make the permit timeline more predictable for those pursuing dredging or filling projects under Section 404.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a defined Period of Prohibition for disposal-site specifications under 404(c).
The Period of Prohibition starts once an applicant submits all required information.
The Period of Prohibition ends when the Secretary issues the permit.
The change applies only to applications submitted after enactment.
Public notice and hearings continue alongside the new timing rule.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Section 1 provides the formal citation of the act as the Reducing Permitting Uncertainty Act.
Specification period defined
Section 2(a) inserts a new structure into 404(c): a Period of Prohibition during which the Administrator may prohibit or withdraw a disposal-site specification. This period begins when the applicant submits all information required to complete the permit application and ends when the Secretary issues the permit.
Applicability
Section 2(b) states that the amendments apply to permit applications submitted after the date of enactment, ensuring the new timing rule affects future reviews rather than ongoing cases.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Applicants pursuing Section 404 permits for dredged or fill material benefit from a clearer, predictable timeline and reduced uncertainty about when a disposal-site designation can be prohibited or withdrawn.
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other permitting agencies benefit from a defined window that aligns review actions with a complete information package, potentially reducing administrative drift.
- Local governments and project sponsors gain clarity for project planning, budgeting, and financing by having a known end point to the prohibition period.
Who Bears the Cost
- Applicants who fail to assemble all required information promptly may experience delays if they delay submitting complete information, extending the start of the prohibition window.
- Regulatory agencies could incur higher administrative overhead to track completeness and monitor the start and end of the prohibition period.
- Some projects might face financing or scheduling challenges if the permit remains unresolved at the end of the prohibition period due to delays in subsequent steps or administrative bottlenecks.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing a predictable permit timeline with the risk of an indefinite prohibition if a permit is never issued—will a project be unfairly constrained by a policy designed to reduce uncertainty?
The bill introduces a precise mechanism to curb uncertainty, but it creates potential tensions around what constitutes “all information required” to complete a permit and how long the prohibition lasts if a permit is never issued. In practice, the window offers predictability but could yield extended risk if a project stalls rather than proceeding to approval.
Agencies will need clear guidance on information completeness and process timing to avoid disputes over when the prohibition starts or ends.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.