Codify — Article

Wall Street Tax Act of 2025 would impose a federal tax on securities and derivatives trades

Creates a graduated financial-transaction tax (0.02% → 0.1%) on covered purchases and derivative payments, with collection duties for exchanges, brokers, and certain taxpayers.

The Brief

The Wall Street Tax Act of 2025 adds a new subchapter to the Internal Revenue Code to tax certain trading transactions in securities and derivatives. The tax applies to covered purchases and to payments under derivatives, uses a fair-market-value base (or payment amount for derivatives), phases in rates from 0.02 percent in 2026 up to 0.1 percent from 2030 onward, and exempts initial issuances and certain short-term traded debt.

Beyond raising revenue, the bill shifts collection responsibilities to U.S. exchanges and brokers when trades occur through them and places reporting and anti-avoidance duties on the Treasury in coordination with the SEC and CFTC. The provision treats controlled foreign corporations as U.S. persons for coverage and creates pro rata payment responsibility for U.S. shareholders where a CFC is the covered counterparty, raising cross-border compliance and incidence questions for market participants and tax administrators.

At a Glance

What It Does

It imposes a percentage tax on each covered transaction: the tax equals the applicable percentage (0.02% in initial years, ramping to 0.1%) times the fair market value of the security (or the payment amount for derivatives). The law inserts a new Chapter 36 subchapter that defines covered transactions, the tax base, payer rules, and enforcement authority.

Who It Affects

Domestic and foreign entities that trade U.S.-listed securities or enter derivatives tied to U.S. counterparties — including exchanges, broker-dealers, market makers, hedge funds, institutional investors, and U.S. shareholders of controlled foreign corporations.

Why It Matters

This is a broad, economy-level levy on trading activity that targets both exchange-listed trades and derivatives payments and assigns collection duties to market infrastructure; it changes transaction costs across markets, creates new compliance obligations for financial firms, and embeds cross-border tax collection mechanics that will affect multinational structures.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill creates a new transaction tax that hits two kinds of events: purchases of securities and payments under derivatives. For purchases the tax base is the fair market value of the security at the time of the trade; for derivatives the base is the amount of any payment.

The tax rate phases up over several years: 0.02 percent for covered transactions occurring in the first phase, stepping up each year until it reaches 0.1 percent for trades after December 31, 2029.

A transaction is a "covered transaction" if it occurs on or under the rules of a U.S. qualified board or exchange, or if either counterparty is a U.S. person; derivatives are covered if traded on U.S. boards or if any party with rights is a U.S. person. The bill explicitly excludes taxes on initial issuances of securities (so primary market issuances like IPOs are not taxed) and excludes traded short-term debt with fixed maturities of 100 days or less from the debt definition.

The bill pulls in the definition of a qualified exchange by reference to existing tax code language.Collection is assigned first to the market infrastructure: a U.S. exchange must remit the tax on transactions occurring on its platform; a U.S. broker must remit for purchases it executes off-exchange. For trades that do not clear through those channels, the statute makes the purchaser or seller (for securities) or the payor/payee (for derivatives) responsible depending on which party is a U.S. person.

Controlled foreign corporations are treated as U.S. persons for coverage; where a transaction is covered only because of that rule, U.S. shareholders of the CFC must pay the tax on a pro rata basis.The bill contains mechanics for treating exchanges and certain distributions as sales and purchases for tax purposes and instructs the Treasury to consult with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in administering the new levy. The Secretary must issue reporting guidance and regulations to prevent avoidance, including rules addressing use of non-U.S. persons to circumvent the tax.

The amendments to information reporting extend existing CFC reporting obligations to include transactions that become covered solely because of the CFC rule.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The tax rate phases from 0.02% for transactions after Dec. 31, 2025, to 0.1% for transactions after Dec. 31, 2029.

2

The specified base amount is the fair market value of the security at the time of the transaction, except for derivatives where the tax base is the payment amount.

3

U.S. exchanges must remit the tax on trades executed on their platforms; U.S. brokers must remit for purchases they execute off-exchange; otherwise the statute assigns liability to purchaser, seller, payor, or payee depending on which counterparty is a U.S. person.

4

Initial issuances of securities are exempt from the tax, and traded short-term debt with fixed maturities of 100 days or less is excluded from the debt category that would otherwise be taxed.

5

Controlled foreign corporations are treated as U.S. persons for coverage; if a CFC is the only reason a transaction is covered, U.S. shareholders must pay the tax pro rata and additional CFC reporting is required under section 6038.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short title

Designates the bill as the "Wall Street Tax Act of 2025." This is a formal label but also signals intent: the measure is a sector-specific levy aimed at trading activity rather than a general tax change.

Section 2 — New Subchapter C (Sec. 4475)

Tax on trading transactions: scope, rate schedule, and base

Imposes the core tax on each covered transaction and sets the applicable percentage that phases from 0.02% up to 0.1% over a four-year ramp. It defines the specified base amount as the fair market value of the security at trade time, with a different rule for derivatives where the payment amount is the base. The provision also lists what counts as a "security" (stock, partnership interests, most debt, and derivatives) and carves out traded short-term indebtedness with fixed maturities of 100 days or less from the debt bucket.

Section 2 — Covered Transactions and Exceptions

Which trades are taxed and what is excluded

Defines a covered transaction to include purchases on or subject to U.S. qualified exchanges or where either counterparty is a U.S. person; derivatives are covered if traded on U.S. venues or if any rights-holder is a U.S. person. The statute excludes initial primary-market issuances of securities from the tax and provides the short-term debt exception, limiting immediate impact on certain money-market instruments but leaving room for market reclassification risk.

3 more sections
Section 2 — Collection, Exchanges, and Special Rules

Who remits the tax and treatment of exchanges and derivatives

Assigns remittance to exchanges for exchange-traded activity and to U.S. brokers for off-exchange purchases they execute. For other trades the bill pins liability on purchaser/seller or payor/payee depending on which party is a U.S. person. It treats exchanges as effecting sales and purchases between counterparties for tax purposes and generally treats each derivative payment as a separate taxable event unless Treasury provides otherwise.

Section 2 — Controlled Foreign Corporations (Sec. 4475(h)) and Reporting

Cross-border coverage, U.S. shareholder liability, and reporting changes

Declares controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) to be U.S. persons for coverage, meaning transactions involving CFCs can become taxable. Where a transaction is covered solely because of CFC status, the tax liability shifts to U.S. shareholders on a pro rata basis. The bill amends section 6038 to expand information reporting to capture transactions that are covered for CFC reasons, increasing cross-border reporting duties.

Section 2 — Administration, Anti-Avoidance, and Effective Date

Treasury authority, interagency coordination, and timing

Directs the Secretary of the Treasury to administer the tax in consultation with the SEC and CFTC, to promulgate guidance and regulations to prevent avoidance (including use of non-U.S. persons), and to require appropriate reporting. The amendment applies to transactions after December 31, 2025, so the first taxable trades fall in 2026 under the staged rate schedule.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.

Explore Finance in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • U.S. Treasury — raises a dedicated revenue stream from trading activity and broadens the tax base to include both exchange-traded and many derivative transactions.
  • Long‑term investors and certain buy‑and‑hold strategies — may benefit indirectly if the tax dampens high-frequency and ultra-short-term trading activity that can increase volatility and market microstructure noise.
  • Primary market issuers — initial issuances are exempt, protecting IPOs, bond offerings, and similar capital-raising events from the new levy and preserving primary market economics.
  • Policymakers and regulators — gain a policy tool to target transactional speculation while directing the IRS to coordinate with SEC/CFTC on operational rules and avoidance prevention.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Broker‑dealers and exchanges — must implement collection, reporting, and remittance systems, absorb or pass through administrative costs, and manage compliance risk for multi-jurisdictional trades.
  • High‑frequency trading firms and market makers — face direct per‑trade costs that increase marginal trading costs and may reduce profitability of short‑horizon strategies.
  • Institutional investors, pension funds, and mutual funds — likely see higher transaction costs when managers trade, which can be borne directly or passed to end investors through performance drag.
  • Derivatives market participants and swap dealers — will confront valuation complexity (tracking payment amounts and timing), potential double-counting risks, and new monitoring duties for off‑exchange and cross‑border contracts.
  • U.S. shareholders of controlled foreign corporations — could incur unexpected tax remittance obligations and additional reporting where a CFC causes coverage of otherwise offshore transactions.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The bill balances two competing objectives: imposing a broad, administrable levy to raise revenue and curb transient speculative trading versus preserving market liquidity, price discovery, and U.S. capital markets competitiveness; tighter coverage and anti‑avoidance increase revenue but raise compliance complexity and the risk that trading migrates offshore or to untaxed instruments.

The bill is straightforward in concept but leaves several operational and economic questions unresolved. Valuation at the "time of the covered transaction" creates measurement complexity for illiquid instruments, block trades, cross‑venue executions, and especially for multi‑leg derivative structures where the statute treats payments as separate transactions.

The 100‑day exemption for traded short-term debt narrows the tax’s reach into repo and money‑market activity, but it creates an explicit threshold that market participants could arbitrage via maturity engineering or relabeling of instruments.

Cross-border avoidance and incidence are central implementation risks. Treating CFCs as U.S. persons pulls many foreign structures into scope, but the pro rata U.S. shareholder payment rule may be difficult to administer and enforce—especially where ownership is layered or shares are widely dispersed.

The Secretary’s authority to issue anti-avoidance regulations will be necessary but may provoke legal and operational disputes over the reach of those rules. Finally, the economic incidence—the ultimate bearer of the tax—depends on liquidity elasticities and market structure: some costs will fall on market makers and HFTs, others will be passed through to institutional clients and ultimately retail investors.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.