The Preventing Crimes Against Veterans Act of 2025 adds a new federal offense to Chapter 63 of Title 18: anyone who knowingly executes or attempts a scheme to defraud an individual of veterans’ benefits, or in connection with obtaining those benefits, faces fines and up to five years’ imprisonment. The bill defines “veteran” by reference to 38 U.S.C. §101 and limits “veterans’ benefits” to benefits provided by Federal law for a veteran, dependent, or survivor.
This is a narrow, targeted criminal tool for prosecutors: it creates a veterans-specific fraud offense rather than relying solely on general mail, wire, or wire fraud statutes. For compliance officers, veteran-service organizations, paid claim preparers, and the VA, the bill signals heightened criminal exposure for schemes that target veterans or improperly secure their federal benefits — and it raises practical questions about enforcement overlap, resource needs, and the line between mistakes and criminality.
At a Glance
What It Does
Adds a new Section 1352 to Title 18 that criminalizes knowingly executing or attempting any scheme to defraud an individual of veterans’ benefits, or doing so in connection with obtaining veterans’ benefits. Penalty: fines and imprisonment up to five years.
Who It Affects
Prosecutors, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), veteran beneficiaries (including dependents and survivors), paid claims preparers, and organizations that assist veterans in filing federal benefits claims.
Why It Matters
This creates a veterans-targeted federal fraud statute that sits alongside existing fraud laws, giving prosecutors a clearer charging option for scams aimed at veterans and potentially changing how the VA and benefit preparers handle suspicious claim activity.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts a single, stand‑alone criminal provision into Chapter 63 of Title 18. Under the new §1352, the government must prove that a defendant knowingly executed, or tried to execute, a scheme or artifice either to defraud an individual of veterans’ benefits or in connection with obtaining those benefits.
That mens rea—“knowingly”—is the statute’s central culpability requirement; it is not a negligence or mistake standard.
The statute covers both completed schemes and attempts, which broadens prosecutorial tools for interrupted scams and early-stage conduct. It ties the covered benefits to federal benefits for veterans, dependents, and survivors; the bill imports the definition of “veteran” from Title 38, so the class of protected persons mirrors VA law rather than creating a new definition.
The text does not single out specific benefit programs (disability compensation, pensions, education, health care, etc.); instead it uses a catch-all definition of “veterans’ benefits” as any benefit provided by Federal law.Practically, prosecutors gain a veterans‑specific predicate for charging conduct targeted at veterans, which can be simpler to plead and explain to juries than generic mail or wire fraud statutes in some cases. The statute does not create affirmative reporting duties, mandatory restitution, or a civil remedy; those remain governed by existing law.
For entities that help veterans file claims—accredited representatives, preparers, and service organizations—the statute raises the stakes around intentional misconduct but leaves room for legitimate mistakes to be defended under the “knowingly” standard.Implementation will require coordination: the VA’s benefit integrity and investigative offices will likely be the primary source of referrals, and U.S. Attorney offices will need to determine when §1352 offers advantages over existing charges. The statutory maximum (five years) places it at the level of many wire- or mail-fraud-related offenses but below several aggravated fraud statutes; sentencing and whether prosecutors seek enhancements will shape deterrent effect more than the statute’s existence alone.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates 18 U.S.C. §1352 making it a federal crime to knowingly execute or attempt any scheme to defraud an individual of veterans’ benefits, or to do so in connection with obtaining those benefits.
The maximum penalty under the new statute is a fine, imprisonment for not more than five years, or both; the text does not prescribe mandatory restitution or victim compensation.
The statute defines “veteran” by reference to 38 U.S.C. §101 and defines “veterans’ benefits” as any benefit provided by Federal law for a veteran, dependent, or survivor, making the scope explicitly federal.
The conduct covered includes both completed schemes and attempts, which allows charging interrupted or preparatory fraudulent conduct targeting veterans.
The bill is a standalone criminal provision added to Chapter 63 (with a clerical table amendment); it does not create new investigative responsibilities, funding, or civil enforcement mechanisms within the VA or DOJ.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the Act as the “Preventing Crimes Against Veterans Act of 2025.” This is purely nominative and has no substantive effect on interpretation or enforcement.
Creates veterans‑targeted fraud offense and penalty
Adds a new subsection that criminalizes knowingly executing or attempting any scheme or artifice to defraud an individual of veterans’ benefits, or doing so in connection with obtaining those benefits. The provision sets criminal penalties of fines and imprisonment up to five years. The practical effect is to give prosecutors a statute that explicitly references schemes aimed at veterans’ benefits rather than relying only on general fraud statutes.
Definitions: veteran and veterans’ benefits
Defines “veteran” by cross-reference to 38 U.S.C. §101 and defines “veterans’ benefits” as any benefit provided by Federal law for a veteran, dependent, or survivor. By tying the terms to federal law, the bill narrows coverage to federally provided benefits (excluding state-only programs) while aligning the protected class with existing VA definitions.
Clerical amendment to Chapter 63 table of sections
Updates the table of sections for Chapter 63 of Title 18 to insert the new §1352. This is a standard drafting step to place the new offense properly within the criminal code and has no substantive effect beyond organization and citation.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Justice across all five countries.
Explore Justice in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Veterans, dependents, and survivors — The statute provides an explicit federal criminal tool focused on protecting veterans from schemes that steal or improperly obtain federal veterans’ benefits, potentially increasing deterrence and prosecution of scammers who target this population.
- Department of Justice and U.S. Attorney offices — Prosecutors gain a clear, veterans‑specific charging option that can simplify pleadings and jury narratives when a scheme targets veterans’ federal benefits.
- Veterans service organizations and advocates — The statute strengthens the legal framing for outreach and prevention efforts and may encourage closer cooperation with investigative authorities on referral and education campaigns.
Who Bears the Cost
- Individuals and entities who commit intentional fraud targeting veterans — They face criminal fines and up to five years’ imprisonment if convicted under the new offense.
- Paid claim preparers and some benefit-assistance providers — Organizations and preparers that operate near the line between aggressive advocacy and misrepresentation may face heightened criminal exposure and will likely need stronger compliance protocols and training.
- VA and law enforcement agencies — The VA’s benefit‑integrity units and DOJ may absorb additional investigative and prosecutorial workload; absent new funding, this could strain existing resources and slow other enforcement priorities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate goals—strengthening criminal tools to protect a vulnerable population and avoiding over‑criminalization of legitimate assistance—but it resolves that tension by creating a broad, veterans‑specific offense without prescribing enforcement priorities, victim remedies, or safeguards against prosecuting borderline conduct.
The statute creates a focused criminal offense but leaves many operational details unresolved. It does not address restitution, civil remedies, or victim notification, so victims’ recovery will continue to depend on existing restitution authorities or separate civil actions.
The reliance on the “knowingly” standard constrains the statute to intentional conduct, but the bill’s brief phrasing offers little guidance on borderline cases—for example, where a paid preparer makes repeated inaccurate filings that could be negligent or intentionally deceptive.
There is also a risk of overlap with existing federal offenses—mail and wire fraud, conspiracy, false statements, and VA‑specific statutes already criminalize many forms of benefits fraud. Prosecutors will need to decide when §1352 offers a strategic advantage versus pursuing broader fraud charges, and courts may confront arguments about duplicative punishments or whether §1352 is subsumed by other statutes.
Finally, because the bill applies only to federal benefits, it excludes state-level benefits and programs, which means coordination across jurisdictions will be required to address scams that touch both federal and state benefits programs.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.