This bill amends the Small Tract Act of 1983 by adding a new Section 9 that lets the Secretary of Agriculture convey certain cemetery parcels on federal land without consideration to eligible recipients. Conveyed parcels must be used only as cemeteries, are subject to a reversion clause if used otherwise, and the Secretary can waive standard conveyance cost requirements for qualified recipients based on demonstrated need.
The statute defines who counts as a qualified recipient (state or local governments, federally recognized Indian Tribes, or narrowly defined qualified land grant‑merced communities) and defines “cemetery” broadly while capping parcels at 40 acres (plus up to 1 acre adjacent). The bill also explicitly preserves the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA).
Practically, this creates a new pathway for communities to acquire and steward small cemetery sites on USDA‑managed land, while leaving significant discretion and implementation questions with the Secretary.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates a statutory mechanism (new Section 9 to the Small Tract Act) allowing the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer cemetery parcels used or formerly used as cemeteries to eligible recipients without monetary consideration. Transfers carry a use restriction limiting the land to cemetery purposes, a reversion option if the restriction is violated, and an explicit waiver power to relieve recipients of some standard conveyance costs.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the U.S. Forest Service (land managers), federally recognized Indian Tribes, state and local governments that maintain or claim cemeteries, and communities identified as qualified land grant‑merced (a narrowly defined New Mexico category). Families, descendants, and local cemetery operators also face new opportunities and obligations under transferred title.
Why It Matters
The bill creates a route for federal lands with historic or active cemeteries to move into local stewardship without purchase, potentially resolving long‑standing stewardship gaps. It recognizes particular historic land‑grant communities and gives the Secretary broad discretion in waiving costs, which could set administrative precedents for future no‑cost conveyances.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill inserts a new conveyance tool into the Small Tract Act: Section 9 authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer, at no cost, parcels used or formerly used as cemeteries to a limited set of eligible recipients. The statute treats the transfer as a conveyance of real property subject to a required use restriction — the land must remain devoted to cemetery purposes — and lets the Secretary reclaim the parcel if it’s used for something else.
That creates both a stewardship opportunity and an ongoing compliance posture for recipients.
Definitions matter. The bill defines “cemetery” broadly to include any natural or prepared spot where human remains are deposited, above or below ground, and it recognizes an Indian Tribe’s determination that a place is a cemetery.
It limits eligible parcels to 40 acres or less and allows up to an additional one acre immediately adjacent. The set of eligible recipients is specific: state or local governments, federally recognized Tribes, and a narrowly drawn “qualified land grant‑merced” category tied to New Mexico law and historical use or patented boundaries.On costs and process, the Secretary has explicit authority to waive the application of Section 4 requirements (which govern Small Tract Act conveyances) for these cemetery transfers when a recipient demonstrates need; the bill clarifies this waiver is in addition to other waiver language already in Section 4.
That combination leaves significant discretion to the agency on whether to charge fees, require surveys, or impose other standard administrative conditions. The bill also states that nothing herein alters NAGPRA — transfers do not change federal obligations around protection and repatriation of Native remains.Implementation will require the Forest Service to establish how recipients show a “bona fide interest or historic claim,” how the agency documents and enforces the cemetery‑use restriction, and how it handles competing claims (for example, between a Tribe and a local government).
The inclusion of qualified land‑grant communities (tied specifically to New Mexico statutes) and the Tribal determination clause create geographic and evidentiary nuances that the agency will have to operationalize. Finally, the reversion clause preserves federal control as an enforcement backstop but can create title instability for transferees if the Secretary later determines the land has been misused.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill adds Section 9 to the Small Tract Act authorizing the Secretary of Agriculture to convey, without consideration, parcels used or previously used as cemeteries to a qualified person (State/local government, Indian Tribe, or qualified land grant‑merced).
A ‘cemetery’ is defined broadly (any natural or prepared location where human remains are deposited) and the statute caps eligible parcels at 40 acres, with allowance for up to 1 acre adjacent to the cemetery parcel.
Every conveyance is conditioned on continued use as a cemetery; if the Secretary determines the land is used for any other purpose, title may, at the Secretary’s discretion, revert to the United States.
The Secretary may waive the application of Section 4 (conveyance requirements and costs) for qualified recipients based on demonstrated need, and that waiver authority is stated to be supplemental to existing Section 4 authority.
The ‘qualified land grant‑merced’ category is narrowly tied to New Mexico statutes and requires either historical/traditional use on federal lands or a patented exterior boundary that abuts federal land; NAGPRA obligations remain explicitly unaffected.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the act’s short title: 'Small Cemetery Conveyance Act.' This is nominal but signals Congress’s intent to create a discrete statutory regime for cemetery conveyances distinct from other Small Tract Act disposals.
Adds cemetery conveyance authority to Small Tract Act
Amends section 2(a) of the Small Tract Act to add paragraph (3), expressly authorizing cemetery conveyances without consideration in accordance with the new Section 9. Practically, this establishes statutory authority rather than relying on ad hoc administrative transfers and integrates cemetery dispositions into the Small Tract Act framework.
Removes cemetery from an existing exclusion list
Strikes language in section 3(6) that previously listed a cemetery (and a parcel up to 1 acre adjacent) among certain enumerated items, replacing the phrase with a shorter list that omits cemeteries. That change clears a drafting conflict so cemeteries are no longer treated as the same category previously excluded, allowing the new, affirmative conveyance regime to apply.
Core conveyance mechanics, use restriction, and reversion
Subsection (a) authorizes the no‑cost conveyance to a 'qualified person.' Subsection (b) attaches a nonuse diversion condition: the property may only be used for operating a cemetery. Subsection (c) gives the Secretary the discretion to declare a reversion of title and improvements if the condition is breached. These provisions create both an opportunity for local stewardship and an ongoing federal enforcement mechanism that will require recordkeeping and monitoring.
Waiver of Section 4 requirements and costs
Subsection (d) allows the Secretary to waive Section 4 conveyance requirements and associated costs for qualified recipients based on demonstrated need, and clarifies that this waiver is in addition to other waiver authorities in Section 4. The practical effect is to allow fee relief or relaxed administrative prerequisites in appropriate cases, but it vests substantial discretion in the agency.
Definitions: cemetery, Indian Tribe, qualified land grant‑merced, qualified person
Defines key terms: 'cemetery' (broad, includes Tribal determinations and any place remains are deposited), 'Indian Tribe' (federally recognized entities), 'qualified land grant‑merced' (tied to New Mexico law and specific historical or boundary criteria), and 'qualified person' (State/local governments, Tribes, or qualified land grant‑merced). These definitions limit who can receive parcels and introduce jurisdictional particularities, especially for New Mexico land‑grant communities.
Preserves NAGPRA obligations
The bill explicitly states it does not modify, waive, or otherwise affect the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. That preserves federal responsibilities for sampling, repatriation, and consultation regarding Native human remains, even after conveyance.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federally recognized Indian Tribes — gain a statutory pathway to acquire cemetery parcels on federal land, including the ability to have Tribal determinations of what constitutes a cemetery respected in the statute, which supports cultural stewardship and repatriation responsibilities.
- State and local governments — can receive title to small community or historic cemeteries at no cost, removing federal management burdens and enabling local maintenance and administrative control.
- Qualified land grant‑merced communities in New Mexico — receive targeted recognition and an avenue to secure parcels tied to historical community use or patented boundaries, helping resolve long‑standing community burial grounds claims.
- Descendant families and cemetery caretakers — benefit from clearer title pathways and a higher likelihood that small, neglected cemetery sites can be legally transferred to entities that will maintain them.
Who Bears the Cost
- U.S. Forest Service/Secretary of Agriculture — bears administrative workload to evaluate claims, document conveyances, apply reversion conditions, and monitor post‑transfer compliance; potential legal defense costs if conveyances are contested.
- Recipient governments and communities — accept ongoing maintenance and liability for conveyed cemetery parcels and must demonstrate bona fide interest or need to obtain waivers for conveyance costs.
- Competing claimants and adjacent private landowners — may face legal uncertainty or litigation if title, historic claims, or boundary descriptions are ambiguous following a federal transfer.
- Federal budget/agency resources — waiving Section 4 fees and costs may shift costs from recipients to federal budgets (e.g., surveys, environmental reviews), or require the agency to absorb unpaid transactional expenses.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The core tension is between returning historic cemetery sites to local or Tribal control—advancing cultural stewardship and local responsibility—and preserving federal legal obligations, administrative consistency, and property‑title certainty: the bill solves stewardship gaps but does so by granting broad agency discretion and creating uneven geographic categories, producing trade‑offs between cultural restoration and predictable, uniform legal administration.
The bill delegates substantial discretion to the Secretary on two critical fronts: (1) deciding when to waive Section 4 requirements or fees based on a recipient’s 'demonstrated need,' and (2) determining when to exercise the reversion remedy. Discretion helps adapt to diverse cases but also risks inconsistent outcomes among similar applicants and invites legal challenges from denied applicants or competing claimants.
The absence of detailed procedural requirements (for instance, no statutory timetable, no specified documentation standards for 'bona fide interest,' and no mandatory consultation process beyond recognizing Tribal determinations) forces the agency to fill many gaps through regulation or internal policy.
The definition of 'qualified land grant‑merced' is narrowly drafted around New Mexico statutes and historical use or patented exterior boundaries. That creates a geographically uneven benefit: communities outside New Mexico with analogous historical claims lack a parallel statutory pathway.
Additionally, while the bill preserves NAGPRA obligations, moving title to non‑federal hands does not eliminate practical tensions around the custody, examination, and repatriation of Native human remains. The statute does not specify how ongoing NAGPRA responsibilities will be carried out post‑conveyance, nor does it set protocols for contemporaneous discovery of remains, consultation requirements, or funding for compliance.
Finally, the reversion clause offers enforcement leverage but also undermines long‑term title certainty for transferees, which can discourage investment in site upkeep or improvements and complicate local planning.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.