This bill designates the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic in San Jose, California, with the formal name "Corporal Patrick D. Tillman Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic" and the short form "Pat Tillman VA Clinic." It includes a findings section summarizing Tillman’s biography, military service, awards, and the circumstances of his death.
The naming is purely commemorative: the statute directs that any reference in federal law, regulation, map, or document to the identified clinic will be read as a reference to the new name. The bill does not appropriate funds or change the clinic’s mission or services; it creates an administrative obligation for the VA and other federal record-keepers to adopt the new designation in official materials.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill enacts a statutory name change for a specific VA community-based outpatient clinic in San Jose and says the full and short names are official for all federal references. It sets the effective point as 'after the date of enactment' but includes no implementation funding.
Who It Affects
Directly affected parties include the Department of Veterans Affairs (which must update internal records, signage, and public-facing materials), federal agencies and publishers that reference the facility in laws or guidance, and local stakeholders who use the clinic name (veterans groups, city officials, mapping and directory services).
Why It Matters
Commemorative naming statutes are routine, but they create concrete administrative tasks and establish a reported precedent for honoring individuals through VA facility names. Compliance officers and facilities managers should expect updates to legal references, IT systems, and physical signage without a dedicated appropriation.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill opens with a findings section that lists Pat Tillman’s San Jose roots, academic and athletic achievements, NFL career, voluntary enlistment after September 11, service as an Army Ranger, deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, and his death in 2004. The findings also note posthumous honors including the Silver Star, Purple Heart, and promotion to corporal; Congress uses that biographical material to explain the rationale for the naming.
The operative text is a short renaming clause. It prescribes two forms of the facility name — a formal long title and a colloquial short title — and contains a catch-all rule: whenever any United States law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record refers to the specified community-based outpatient clinic, that reference is to be read as the new name.
The statute takes effect upon enactment (phrased as "after the date of enactment") and thus gives the VA a clear trigger point for making changes to official materials.Notably, the bill contains no language that authorizes or directs appropriations to pay for signage, database changes, or other implementation costs. That omission leaves the Department of Veterans Affairs responsible for absorbing administrative expenses within existing budgets or seeking separate funding.
The renaming does not alter the clinic’s operational authority, legal status, or the services it provides; it is a commemorative designation that changes nomenclature across federal records and references.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Section 1 contains enumerated findings—eight discrete paragraphs—summarizing Tillman’s life, college and NFL career, military service, circumstances of death, and posthumous honors.
Section 2 prescribes two official names for the San Jose community-based outpatient clinic: the full "Corporal Patrick D. Tillman Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic" and the short form "Pat Tillman VA Clinic.", The statute states that any reference 'in any law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States' to that clinic is to be treated as a reference to the new name, creating a broad cross-reference rule.
The bill takes effect 'after the date of enactment' but includes no appropriation or funding directive for implementing changes such as signage, publications, or IT updates.
The change is strictly nominal and does not modify the clinic’s mission, services, governance, property rights, or operational authorities under existing VA law.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings summarizing Tillman’s biography and service
This section lists the factual predicates Congress relied on to justify the commemorative naming: birthplace and schooling in San Jose, collegiate achievements, NFL draft and career, voluntary enlistment, assignment to the 75th Ranger Regiment, deployments, and death by friendly fire in Afghanistan. The practical effect of findings is symbolic—Congress documents its view that the honoree merits recognition—but they can also serve as a reference point if anyone queries the legislative intent behind the name.
Formal and short names established
The first operative paragraph creates two official names for the specific community-based outpatient clinic in San Jose. Agencies, published materials, and legal documents may use either the long formal title or the abbreviated 'Pat Tillman VA Clinic.' For procurement, signage, and communications teams, the presence of both names creates an immediate style decision: when to use the formal name and when the short form is appropriate.
Cross-reference rule and effective date
The second paragraph imposes a broad cross-reference instruction—any federal reference to the clinic is to be considered a reference to the new name—and sets the change to take effect after enactment. This clause forces updates across statutory citations, regulations, maps, and federal records. Because Congress did not include implementation funding, the VA must schedule updates to IT systems, regulatory texts, and physical signage from existing resources or request separate appropriations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Veterans across all five countries.
Explore Veterans in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Tillman’s family and supporters — they receive a permanent federal recognition that enshrines his name in VA infrastructure and federal records.
- Local veterans and advocacy groups in San Jose — the named clinic may draw greater public attention and ceremonial opportunities, which can aid outreach and community engagement.
- Historical and commemorative organizations — the statute adds an officially recognized site tied to a nationally known figure, useful for memorialization and educational activities.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Veterans Affairs — responsible for updating signage, brochures, websites, electronic records, and internal databases without an appropriation tied to this bill.
- Federal agencies and publishers that maintain legal references and maps — they must reconcile and update references to avoid inconsistency across federal materials.
- Contractors and vendors (signage, web, publishing) — may incur work orders and invoiceable tasks to change branding and materials; those costs will be passed through to VA or absorbed by existing contracts.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances symbolic commemoration against operational neutrality and fiscal restraint: Congress chooses to honor a widely recognized veteran by changing a federal facility’s name, but it does so without funding implementation and in a way that can create short-term administrative burdens and potential confusion for service users.
The bill is short and substantive only in name: it creates an official designation and a broad cross-reference rule but leaves implementation logistics unspecified. That leads to two practical challenges.
First, the lack of an appropriation means the VA must prioritize this administrative work against other operational demands; updating signs, maps, and digital records is straightforward but not free. Agencies will need to decide whether to roll the name change into routine maintenance cycles or request separate funding, and that decision will affect the speed and uniformity of adoption.
Second, the cross-reference language is sweeping and can create inconsistent usages in the near term. Federal statutes, regulations, and archived documents that mention the clinic by its old name will now be treated as referring to the new name, but outside publications, commercial directories, and local references may lag, causing temporary confusion for veterans seeking care.
The bill also reinforces a policy trade-off inherent in commemorative naming: it honors individuals but may complicate neutral, functional naming conventions within a national health system. Finally, the findings recite contested facts of Tillman’s death (including the characterization of fratricide and circumstances) that, while largely historical, could prompt debate about the appropriateness of specific language in the legislative findings versus the naming itself.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.