Codify — Article

SMART for TBI Act: DoD to develop AI-based digital health strategy

Directs the Secretary of Defense to craft a strategy using AI and digital health tools to treat traumatic brain injuries, with a 2026 briefing.

The Brief

The SMART for TBI Act directs the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy for treating traumatic brain injuries through digital health technologies, by amending Section 735 of the FY2023 NDAA. It creates a cross‑disciplinary working group inside DoD to map how AI and digital health tools can improve TBIs care, identify capability gaps, and analyze current R&D and acquisition efforts.

The bill requires a recommended investment plan to field digital health technologies for TBI and a briefing to Congress not later than September 30, 2026.

The Act codifies a structured, defense‑oriented approach to integrating digital health and AI into traumatic brain injury treatment. By mandating concrete elements—gap identification, research and acquisition analysis, and an investment plan—it aims to accelerate translation of research into fielded capabilities while ensuring oversight through a formal briefing to Congress.

The bill does not itself authorize funding; it sets the governance and deliverables that would guide subsequent budgeting and procurement decisions.

At a Glance

What It Does

Establishes a working group within the DoD to develop a strategy for treating TBIs with digital health technologies, and amends NDAA 2023 to add a new subsection (e) detailing required elements.

Who It Affects

Involves the Department of Defense, military medical facilities, DoD civilians, and external experts; impacts the acquisition ecosystem that sources AI and digital health tools for military TBIs care.

Why It Matters

Signals a formal, cross‑disciplinary approach to leveraging AI and digital health for TBI treatment, aiming to close care gaps and accelerate fielding of new technologies while requiring a 2026 briefing to Congress.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill creates a dedicated effort within the Department of Defense to rethink how traumatic brain injuries are treated using digital health tools and AI. It starts by amending the National Defense Authorization Act to add a new subsection (e) under Section 735, specifically focused on digital health technologies for TBI care.

The core deliverable is a strategy developed by a newly formed working group that includes military personnel, DoD civilian staff, and non‑federal experts with relevant expertise in TBI clinical care, biomedical informatics, engineering, or implementation science.

The working group must map capability gaps that digital health technologies and AI could address, assess what already exists in research, development, and current DoD acquisition efforts—including any commercial off‑the‑shelf solutions used today—and produce recommendations to close those gaps and improve TBI treatment. It also must outline an investment plan to advance technology readiness and bring digital health solutions into field use.

Finally, the Secretary must brief the defense committees in Congress on the strategy by September 30, 2026, ensuring a formal point of accountability for progress and alignment with defense health priorities.Overall, the bill formalizes a strategic, evidence‑based approach to integrating AI‑driven and digital health interventions into military TBIs care, with a clear timeline for reporting back to Congress. It emphasizes governance, cross‑disciplinary collaboration, and a structured evaluation of where digital tools can meaningfully improve patient outcomes in TBIs while anchoring these efforts in the DoD’s existing oversight mechanisms.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill amends Section 735 of the FY2023 NDAA to add a new subsection (e) focused on digital health technologies for TBI.

2

It requires a Working Group comprising Armed Forces members, DoD civilian staff, and non‑federal experts with TBI, biomedical informatics, engineering, or implementation science expertise.

3

The Strategy must identify capability gaps addressable by AI and digital health technologies and analyze existing R&D and acquisition efforts, including any COTS solutions used by the Secretary.

4

It mandates a recommended investment plan to mature technology readiness levels and field digital health technologies for TBI care.

5

The Secretary must brief Congress on the strategy by September 30, 2026.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short title

This section provides the act’s official title and citation. It designates the measure as the SMART for TBI Act, also known as the Supporting Modern Approaches in Recovery Technology for Traumatic Brain Injury Act.

Section 2

Digital health strategy for TBIs

This section amends Section 735 of the FY2023 NDAA to add a new subsection (e) that directs the Secretary of Defense to establish a working group and to develop a strategy for treating TBIs through digital health technologies. The working group must include military personnel, civilian DoD employees, and non‑federal experts with relevant expertise, and its mandate includes identifying capability gaps, analyzing R&D and acquisition efforts (including COTS solutions), making concrete recommendations to close gaps, and proposing an investment plan to advance technology readiness levels so digital health tech can be fielded in TBI care. The Secretary is required to brief Congress on the strategy by September 30, 2026.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Defense across all five countries.

Explore Defense in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Service members with traumatic brain injury stand to gain from earlier access to AI‑driven diagnostics and digital care pathways.
  • Defense Health Agency and military medical treatment facilities benefit from a unified strategy and standardized adoption of digital health tools.
  • DoD researchers and contractors working in AI, biomedical informatics, and digital health gain a defined problem space and potential procurement pathways.
  • The Office of the Secretary of Defense and congressional defense committees gain a clear governance mechanism and accountability through a formal briefing.

Who Bears the Cost

  • DoD budget and program offices may need to fund pilot projects and integration efforts for digital health tools.
  • Military medical facilities implementing new digital health systems may incur transition costs and interoperability work.
  • Acquisition and cyber security teams must align with new standards and procurement processes for AI‑based solutions.
  • Contractors providing AI and digital health products could face tighter evaluation criteria and data governance requirements.
  • The broader service members and beneficiaries bear potential privacy and data governance considerations as health data use expands.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

Balancing rapid exploration and fielding of AI/digital health solutions for TBI care with rigorous safety, privacy, and budget discipline remains the central dilemma. The bill pushes for a proactive strategy and investment plan, but real-world adoption requires careful governance, cost controls, and integration within existing DoD health IT and clinical workflows.

The bill creates a structured path to explore AI and digital health applications for TBI care, but it also raises questions about how to govern data, ensure interoperability with existing DoD health IT systems, and manage costs within the DoD budget process. Data privacy, cybersecurity, and medical device safety standards will need careful alignment with DoD policies.

The success of the strategy depends on clear milestones, credible evaluation criteria for investments, and seamless coordination across services, the Defense Health Agency, and the broader defense ecosystem. The act does not itself authorize funding, so the practical impact will hinge on subsequent budget decisions and the implementation plan that follows the 2026 briefing.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.