HB4354 would require the Secretary of Agriculture to establish an Emergency Relief Program that pays producers for qualified losses due to disasters in a crop year. The bill defines disasters broadly (droughts, wildfires, floods, freezes, and more) and ties relief to existing Farm Service Agency programs.
It imposes two calculation methods—an indemnity-based approach using prior insurance data and a revenue-based approach using benchmark and disaster-year revenue—plus caps that depend on a producer’s AGI and crop category. It also requires producers to carry Federal Crop Insurance or NAP coverage for the two following crop years and authorizes appropriations through 2030 to fund the program.
At a Glance
What It Does
Creates an Emergency Relief Program that pays eligible producers for qualified losses in a crop year. It uses two calculation methods (indemnity-based and revenue-based) and applies caps tied to income and crop type, with a mandatory insurance/coverage requirement for future years.
Who It Affects
Directly affects crop producers with insured or noninsured crops that incur qualified losses due to defined disasters, including specialty/high-value crops and wine grapes under specific provisions.
Why It Matters
Provides formal disaster relief anchored to existing risk-management tools, potentially influencing producers’ insurance decisions and stabilizing cash flow during years of extreme weather.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Agricultural Emergency Relief Act would create a federal program administered by the Secretary of Agriculture to compensate producers who incur qualified losses in a given crop year due to disasters defined in the bill. A covered disaster includes droughts, wildfires, hurricanes, floods, extreme heat or moisture, winter storms, and polar-vortex freezes, with specific criteria for drought determination.
The program is designed to work alongside current disaster aid and crop insurance programs administered by the Farm Service Agency (FSA).
A producer is eligible if they experience a qualified loss, and they must apply to the Secretary with a description of each loss. The Secretary will approve applications demonstrating a qualified loss and provide payments for the applicable crop year.
A key administrative condition is that producers must purchase Federal Crop Insurance for the next two crop years, or, if not available, coverage under the Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP), as a condition of receiving relief.Payments are calculated in two ways. The first is indemnity-based, using available data such as prior indemnities, coverage levels, and a maximum factor (not to exceed 90%) to determine a payment attributable to qualified losses.
The second method is revenue-based, comparing benchmark year revenue to disaster year revenue, adjusted for the portion from specialty/high-value crops, and applying a cap (not more than 70% in certain cases). Certain premium adjustments apply for wine grapes used to produce wine, where payments reflect market rates for wine grapes instead of revenue-derived figures.
The act authorizes appropriations for 2025–2030 and allows up to 1% of annual funds to cover administrative costs of the Secretary.The bill sets overall payment caps by producer tax position (AGI-based) and by crop category. For producers with average adjusted gross income below 75%, caps are lower; for those at 75% or higher, caps are higher for specialty/high-value crops and still substantial for other crops.
The total payments cannot exceed a percentage of qualified losses or the sum of applicable indemnities and program benefits from other insurance programs, ensuring there is not an unlimited federal payout in a single year.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The act creates an Emergency Relief Program to pay producers with qualified losses due to defined disasters in a crop year.
Payments use two calculation methods: indemnity-based (relying on prior insurance data) and revenue-based (based on benchmark versus disaster-year revenue).
Caps vary by agricultural income and crop type: up to 125,000 per crop category for AGI under 75%, or up to 900,000 (specialty) / 250,000 (other crops) for AGI at or above 75%.
Producers must purchase Federal Crop Insurance or NAP for the two subsequent crop years to participate.
Wine grape producers with at least 75% of grapes used for wine at their own facility have payments calculated at the market rate for wine grapes.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and key terms
This section defines critical terms used throughout the bill. It specifies how to measure a producer’s average adjusted gross income (AAGI) and how to interpret ‘disaster’ to include droughts, wildfires, floods, and other extreme events. It also clarifies what constitutes a ‘producer,’ exclusions (joint ventures and general partnerships), and what qualifies as a ‘loss’ in crops, trees, bushes, or vines. These definitions tie the program to existing Farm Service Agency programs and set the stage for eligibility and calculation mechanics.
Emergency Relief Program: establishment and eligibility
The Secretary must establish an Emergency Relief Program that pays eligible producers for qualified losses during each crop year. To obtain a payment, a producer must submit an application with information describing each loss; the Secretary approves the application if a qualified loss is shown. The program is designed to operate in parallel with existing disaster and insurance programs and link eligibility to the producer’s engagement with crop insurance or NAP.
Payments: amount and calculation methods
Payments are made after approval of applications. The bill provides two calculation tracks: an indemnity-based method using data such as prior indemnities and coverage levels (with an overall cap factor not to exceed 90%), and a revenue-based method that uses benchmark-year revenue and disaster-year revenue, adjusted for high-value crops and other factors, with a cap not to exceed 70% if insurance was not purchased. The section also includes a special vertical-integration provision for wine grapes to ensure payments reflect the market rate rather than revenue-derived figures.
Authorization of appropriations
The bill authorizes the Secretary to appropriate funds as necessary for fiscal years 2025 through 2030 to carry out the Act. It also allows up to 1% of annual appropriations to cover the Secretary’s administrative costs, ensuring a funded program with a capped overhead.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Agriculture across all five countries.
Explore Agriculture in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Producers with insured crops who incur a qualified loss and qualify for indemnity-based relief.
- Wine grape growers who meet the 75% grape-use threshold and for whom payments are treated under the wine-grape market-rate rule.
- Specialty crops and high-value crop producers who qualify for higher caps under AGI-based limits.
- Producers experiencing disaster-year revenue declines who may benefit from revenue-based relief even if not fully insured.
- Farm operations seeking predictable post-disaster cash flow to sustain operations and recovery efforts.
Who Bears the Cost
- The federal government, funded through annual appropriations, bears the direct cost of the payments.
- The Secretary’s administrative costs, capped at 1% of annual appropriations, absorb a portion of the funds set aside for relief.
- Producers are obligated to purchase eligible insurance or NAP coverage to receive relief, shifting some future premium and compliance costs to the producers themselves.
- Budgetary pressure could arise if disasters become more frequent or severe, increasing demand for relief beyond baseline projections.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Should the program maximize relief for disaster-stricken producers by leaning on revenue-based calculations and high caps, or should it prioritize enforceable incentives to maintain insurance uptake and preserve federal budgetary discipline?
The bill clusters relief around a framework of existing crop-insurance programs, creating a backstop that leans on insured outcomes to determine relief. This design risks double-dipping if indemnities from crop insurance and the emergency payments overlap beyond the stated caps, even as it seeks to minimize overlap by tying total payments to a percentage of qualified losses.
The revenue-based approach adds complexity, requiring careful data validation (benchmark revenues, disaster-year revenues, and categorization of crops) to prevent gaming and ensure consistency across producers with differing product mixes. A notable implementation question is how the 75% wine-grape rule interacts with diverse vineyard operations and whether market-rate calculations could produce volatility in payments across vintners.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.