The Developing and Empowering our Aspiring Leaders Act of 2025 orders the Securities and Exchange Commission to amend the venture capital adviser exemption under the Investment Advisers Act by broadening what counts as a "qualifying investment." Specifically, the SEC must revise 17 C.F.R. §275.203(l)-1 to treat equity securities issued by qualifying portfolio companies—whether bought directly or through a secondary acquisition—as qualifying, and to treat investments in other venture capital funds as qualifying investments.
The bill also adds a portfolio-concentration rule: immediately after any asset purchase, a private fund claiming venture capital status may hold no more than 49 percent of its capital (capital contributions plus uncalled committed capital) in either (A) one or more venture capital funds, or (B) qualifying investments acquired via secondary acquisitions, with those holdings valued at cost or at fair value provided the fund applies its chosen method consistently. The changes force SEC rulemaking within 180 days and will affect fund structuring, secondary market activity, valuations, and adviser eligibility for the exemption.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires the SEC, within 180 days of enactment, to revise the regulatory definition of a "qualifying investment" for the venture capital adviser exemption to include (1) equity securities issued by qualifying portfolio companies acquired directly or in secondary transactions and (2) investments in other venture capital funds. It also imposes a 49% post-acquisition concentration cap on certain fund holdings measured against aggregate capital contributions and uncalled commitments.
Who It Affects
The rule change targets advisers claiming the venture capital fund exemption, private funds that invest in secondaries or fund-of-funds, secondary-market buyers of venture interests, and compliance teams responsible for valuation and reporting under the Advisers Act. The SEC is the agency tasked with writing the implementing regulation.
Why It Matters
By changing what counts as a qualifying investment and adding a numerical concentration test, the bill can broaden which funds and advisers qualify for the lighter regulatory regime while creating new compliance and valuation questions. That alters commercial incentives for structuring funds, participating in secondaries, and using fund-of-fund strategies under the exemption.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill compels the Securities and Exchange Commission to change the technical rule that determines whether a private fund qualifies as a venture capital fund for purposes of the Investment Advisers Act exemption. That exemption lets certain advisers avoid full registration and some regulatory obligations if they manage funds that invest primarily in early-stage, illiquid companies.
The statute places two changes front and center: expand the statutory list of qualifying investments to include (a) equity securities of qualifying portfolio companies even when acquired in secondary transactions and (b) investments in other venture capital funds; and add a measurable concentration test to paragraph (a) of the existing rule.
Practically, the first change removes an ambiguity that has discouraged advisers from treating secondary purchases of venture equity or fund-of-funds stakes as "qualifying" for the exemption. By instructing the SEC to count these holdings, advisers who use secondary markets or invest in other VC funds may be able to meet the definition of a venture capital fund where previously they might not.
The bill explicitly allows secondary acquisitions to be qualifying investments, not only primary, direct purchases from portfolio companies.The second change imposes an immediate-post-acquisition limit: after buying any asset, a fund must not have more than 49 percent of its aggregate capital and uncalled commitments invested in either (i) one or more venture capital funds or (ii) qualifying investments acquired via secondary acquisitions. The bill allows valuation at cost or fair value, but requires the fund to apply the chosen method consistently.
That creates a mechanical test advisers must monitor on every transaction and signals the Legislature’s attempt to balance flexibility for secondary and fund-of-funds strategies against a cap intended to preserve a fund’s “venture” character.Together, the directives are procedural (they require the SEC to write or amend a rule) but substantive in effect: advisers and private funds will need to revisit offering documents, compliance controls, portfolio-monitoring systems, and valuation policies to ensure that qualifying investments and concentration levels are recorded and defended under the new regulatory text. The 180-day deadline for the SEC to act compresses the timeline for both rule drafting and market participants’ planning.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The SEC must complete rule revisions within 180 days of enactment to amend 17 C.F.R. §275.203(l)-1.
The bill requires the definition of "qualifying investment" to include equity securities of qualifying portfolio companies acquired either directly from the company or through secondary market transactions.
Investments in other venture capital funds must be treated as qualifying investments for purposes of the venture capital adviser exemption.
The bill imposes a 49% concentration limit: immediately after any asset acquisition, no more than 49% of a fund’s aggregate capital contributions plus uncalled committed capital may be invested in either (A) one or more venture capital funds or (B) qualifying investments acquired in secondary acquisitions.
Funds may value holdings used to test the 49% cap at cost or fair value, but must apply the chosen valuation method consistently across the fund.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the Act’s name: the "Developing and Empowering our Aspiring Leaders Act of 2025." This is a technical labeling provision that has no regulatory effect but is the reference used throughout the text and implementing guidance.
Expand qualifying investments to include direct and secondary equity and fund investments
Directs the SEC to change the regulatory definition of "qualifying investment" so it explicitly covers (a) equity securities issued by qualifying portfolio companies whether acquired directly from the issuer or in a secondary acquisition, and (b) investments in other venture capital funds. The practical consequence is that secondary market purchases and fund-of-fund stakes cannot be excluded by regulation from counting toward the fund’s qualifying-investment test, removing a legal barrier that previously produced inconsistent treatment across advisers.
49% post-acquisition concentration test
Requires the SEC to adopt a condition that a private fund qualifies as a venture capital fund only if, immediately after any asset purchase, the fund holds no more than 49% of its aggregate capital contributions and uncalled commitments in either (A) one or more venture capital funds or (B) qualifying investments acquired in secondary acquisitions. The bill allows valuation at either cost or fair value but requires consistent application; this creates a periodic, transaction-triggered compliance metric advisers must track and document.
Timeline and targeted regulatory change
The SEC has 180 days to promulgate the revisions, which confines the change to the scope of 17 C.F.R. §275.203(l)-1 but may interact with other SEC rules and staff guidance. The narrow drafting means the agency’s rulemaking will focus on definitions, examples, and valuation guidance rather than on broader overhaul of the adviser registration regime, but the implementing rule may still need to reconcile the amendments with existing disclosure and recordkeeping obligations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Venture capital advisers that rely on the adviser exemption — The expanded definition lets advisers count secondary acquisitions and fund-of-fund investments toward the qualifying-investment test, potentially preserving exemption eligibility for advisers with these strategies.
- Secondary-market buyers of venture equity — Buyers who purchase equity stakes in secondaries get clearer regulatory recognition that those holdings can count as qualifying investments, reducing structural uncertainty in secondary transactions.
- Fund-of-funds and multi-manager structures — Managers that invest in other venture capital funds can have those positions recognized as qualifying investments, smoothing product design for diversified VC vehicles and fund-of-fund strategies.
Who Bears the Cost
- SEC staff and rulewriters — The agency must complete a rulemaking on a compressed timeline and issue interpretive guidance on valuation and secondary transaction scope.
- Advisers’ compliance and valuation teams — Firms must update policies, transaction monitoring, and valuation methodologies to track the 49% post-acquisition cap and justify chosen valuation approaches.
- Investors and fiduciaries monitoring concentrated risk — Limited partners and fiduciaries will need to scrutinize adviser practices; funds might shift portfolio mix toward secondary and fund holdings that change liquidity and risk profiles, which imposes diligence and potential re-negotiation costs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between expanding flexibility for advisers and preserving the exemption’s original investor-protection purpose: counting secondary acquisitions and investments in other VC funds loosens a key gatekeeping mechanism that distinguished direct, early-stage venture investing from broader private-fund activity, but keeping a hard quantitative cap (49%) pushes back against unmoored diversification; the dilemma is whether a rules-based expansion plus a mechanical cap can both enable useful market activity and meaningfully protect investors from funds that are not genuinely venture-focused.
Two implementation frictions stand out. First, the bill authorizes the SEC to treat secondary purchases and fund-of-fund stakes as "qualifying" investments but does not define "secondary acquisition" or set bright-line tests for when a secondary-positioned equity stake looks and behaves like a venture investment.
That means the agency will have to supply definitions and examples, and in practice advisers and auditors may disagree with the SEC or with each other about borderline positions—particularly where secondary stakes come with limited governance or where the history of the stake includes prior public ownership.
Second, the statutory allowance to value holdings at cost or fair value—so long as the fund applies the method consistently—creates a material arbitrage and governance question. Cost valuation can understate current exposures; fair value measurements vary by methodology and can be more volatile and subjective.
Allowing either method without a standard risks inconsistent measurement across funds and can enable gaming of the 49% cap via choice of valuation method. The SEC’s implementing rule could mitigate this by prescribing valuation standards or disclosure requirements, but the statute leaves that step to the agency rather than mandating a single approach.
Finally, although the bill’s changes are narrowly targeted to §275.203(l)-1, they will interact with other regulatory regimes—auditing standards, tax rules, state securities laws, and limited partner agreements—that may not treat secondary or fund-of-fund holdings the same way. Those cross-system mismatches could prompt operational headaches and legal disputes during the transition to the new definition.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.