The Toxic-Free Beauty Act of 2025 would amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit a set of substances in cosmetic products. The bill adds new prohibitions on certain ingredients and contaminants and introduces precise definitions to distinguish color cosmetics, general cosmetics, and contaminants.
It also preserves state and local authority to maintain or adopt stricter rules and sets an orderly transition timeline for compliance.
Key provisions include a ban on any intentionally added ortho-phthalate or formaldehyde-releasing preservative, a named list of 15 prohibited ingredients, defined contaminant thresholds, and extended definitions for color cosmetics, contaminants, and related terms. The amendments also clarify non-preemption to allow states to regulate beyond the federal baseline and establish a January 1, 2027, effective date for these rules when cosmetics are introduced into interstate commerce.
At a Glance
What It Does
Adds new prohibitions to Section 601: bans ortho-phthalates and formaldehyde-releasing preservatives; bars 15 specifically named ingredients; imposes contaminant thresholds for certain chemicals.
Who It Affects
Cosmetic manufacturers and importers selling color and general cosmetics; testing labs and regulators overseeing interstate commerce.
Why It Matters
Creates a clear federal safety floor for cosmetics, reduces exposure to hazardous substances, and sets a predictable transition path for industry while allowing stricter state action where warranted.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill updates federal cosmetics rules by listing substances that cannot be used in cosmetic products. It targets both ingredients and contaminants to boost safety.
The act defines key terms so regulators and manufacturers know which products fall under the rules, and it preserves state powers to go beyond the federal baseline if needed. A 2027 date gives industry time to adjust.
Concretely, the changes add a prohibition on any intentionally added ortho-phthalate or formaldehyde-releasing preservative, and name 15 specific substances that may not be used in cosmetics. The bill also sets contamination thresholds (for example, 1,4-dioxane at 2 parts per million, and lead at specified levels for color vs general cosmetics) and broad definitions to distinguish color cosmetics from general cosmetics and to define contaminants and related terms.
Finally, while federal law will set the standard, states may maintain or enact stricter rules and reporting requirements as applicable, with an effective date tied to interstate commerce beginning in 2027.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill bans ortho-phthalates and formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in cosmetics.
15 named ingredients are prohibited from being intentionally added.
Contaminant thresholds are established for several chemicals (e.g.
1,4-dioxane, lead, asbestos).
Definitions expand to clarify color cosmetics, contaminants, and preservative types.
Effective date for interstate commerce is January 1, 2027.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This section designates the act’s official name as the Toxic-Free Beauty Act of 2025, providing the formal reference point used throughout the bill.
Ban on substances in cosmetics
Section 601 is amended to add subsections (h), (i), and (j). Subsection (h) prohibits any cosmetic ingredient that contains an intentionally added ortho-phthalate or a formaldehyde-releasing preservative. Subsection (i) enumerates 15 ingredients that may not be intentionally added, including formaldehyde, methylene glycol, mercury compounds, isobutylparaben, isopropylparaben, M-Phenylenediamine (and salts), O-Phenylenediamine (and salts), Lilial, Styrene, Toluene, Triclosan, Triclocarban, Cyclotetrasiloxane, acetaldehyde, and vinyl acetate. Subsection (j) prohibits specified contaminants at defined thresholds, such as 1,4-dioxane at 2 ppm, lead at 2 ppm for color cosmetics or 5 ppm for general cosmetics, and asbestos-containing talc at the lowest detectable level.
Definitions added or amended
Section 604 definitions are updated to include ‘color cosmetic’ (e.g., eyeshadow, eyeliner, blush, lipstick, foundation) and ‘contaminant’ (a chemical not intentionally added and incidental to manufacturing), along with the meanings of ‘formaldehyde-releasing preservative,’ ‘general cosmetic,’ ‘ingredient,’ ‘intentionally added,’ and ‘ortho-phthalate.’ These definitions create precise boundaries for what counts as a cosmetic, what is prohibited, and how enforcement will interpret product components.
Non-preemption
Section 614(b) is amended to confirm that nothing in the act preempts State authority to prohibit or regulate ingredient use, maintain existing state reporting requirements, or enforce state-level restrictions on ingredients or contaminants specified in the bill, subject to the federal baseline and the 2022 Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act framework.
Effective date
The amendments apply to cosmetics introduced into interstate commerce beginning January 1, 2027, providing a lead-in period for industry reformulation, testing, and compliance activities.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Consumers, including those with chemical sensitivities, who will have access to safer cosmetic products.
- Parents purchasing cosmetics for children seeking safer products.
- Healthcare professionals (dermatologists, allergists) who treat cosmetic-related reactions and advise patients.
- State and local public health departments that regulate cosmetics and enforce safety standards.
- Responsible cosmetic brands that already avoid restricted substances benefit from a clear federal baseline while maintaining trust with regulators and consumers.
Who Bears the Cost
- Cosmetics manufacturers that currently rely on restricted ingredients for color or preservation will face reformulation costs and potential supply adjustments.
- Small and medium-sized cosmetic firms facing added compliance and testing expenses.
- Importers and distributors who must verify supply chains and ensure product labeling complies with the new prohibitions.
- Regulatory agencies will need resources to enforce the new standards and monitor compliance across interstate commerce.
- Transitional costs to reformulate existing stock and manage product discontinuations during the shift to the new baseline.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing consumer safety with industry reform costs and state-federal regulatory alignment: the bill seeks a strong safety floor while preserving state authority and leaving room for stricter rules, but this creates questions about transition management, enforcement resources, and potential gaps during implementation.
The act makes a strong safety argument by banning a broad set of hazardous substances and establishing clear contaminant thresholds. However, it also creates tensions around implementation and cost.
Industry will need to reformulate, test, and re-label products to comply with the new prohibitions and definitions, while regulators must coordinate federal standards with ongoing state actions under the non-preemption provisions. The 2027 effective date provides a runway, but it also raises questions about how older stock will be treated and how states will align with or diverge from the federal baseline.
Moreover, the definition of ‘color cosmetic’ versus ‘general cosmetic’ could create inconsistencies in enforcement, especially for products that span both categories. Finally, the use of fixed ppm thresholds for contaminants relies on standardized testing capabilities that must be accessible across jurisdictions and international supply chains.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.