The Waste and Illegal Property Eradication (WIPE) Act would authorize the Department of Defense to use expeditionary solid waste disposal systems to destroy illicit contraband, including counterfeit materials, unauthorized military gear, illegal narcotics, and classified materials. It also requires these systems to be available to military installations, forward operating bases, and partner security forces to counter infiltration and protect U.S. assets.
The bill further prohibits the use of open-air burn pits for disposing of contraband, classified materials, or hazardous waste, and it provides a funding mechanism to support procurement of these systems in Fiscal Year 2026, offset by reductions in other Army accounts tied to burn pit usage.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Secretary of Defense may deploy expeditionary solid waste disposal systems to destroy illicit contraband and related materials, with systems configured to support border security and counter-narcotics operations.
Who It Affects
DoD and Army procurement, military installations, forward operating bases, and partner security forces that may access disposal assets for countering illicit trafficking and securing military assets.
Why It Matters
It creates a tangible disposal capacity for contraband at the tactical level and reduces reliance on open-air methods, while tying a specific budget offset to fund the new capability.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The WIPE Act gives the Department of Defense explicit authority to field expeditionary solid waste disposal systems for the purpose of destroying illicit items encountered during operations, including counterfeit goods, illegal drugs, and even classified materials. The aim is to provide a practical, deployable means of destroying these items in the field and at installations, as well as to support broader security objectives such as border control and narcotics interdiction.
To ensure this capability is usable where it matters, the bill directs that those systems be available to military installations, forward operating bases, and partner security forces when needed to counter infiltration or misuse of U.S. military assets. The bill also removes a traditional disposal path by prohibiting open-air burn pits for disposal of contraband, classified materials, or hazardous waste, signaling an environmental and safety preference for contained disposal methods.
Funding is created specifically for FY2026 to procure these systems, offset by a reallocation within Army budgets away from open-air burn pits used in contingency operations. The measure is tightly scoped to enabling disposal capacity and does not establish new agencies or broad program authorities beyond this procurement-and-use framework.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill authorizes the DoD to use expeditionary solid waste disposal systems to destroy illicit contraband and related materials.
The systems deployed under this authority must support border security, narcotics interdiction, and countering infiltration of military assets.
Open-air burn pits may not be used to dispose of illicit contraband, classified materials, or hazardous waste.
FY2026 funding increases for the Army’s Other Procurement account by $8.95 million for solid waste disposal systems.
The same $8.95 million is offset by a reduction in the Army’s O&M funds for Additional Activities, Overseas Operating Costs, derived from burn-pit funding in contingency operations.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Authorization for expeditionary solid waste disposal systems
The Secretary of Defense may employ expeditionary solid waste disposal systems to destroy illicit contraband, including seized counterfeit materials, unauthorized military gear, illegal narcotics, and classified materials. These systems must be capable of supporting operations related to border security, narcotics interdiction, and the elimination of contraband, and they shall be made available to military installations, forward operating bases, and partner security forces as needed to counter infiltration and unauthorized use of U.S. military assets.
Prohibition on open-air burn pits
The bill prohibits the use of open-air burn pits for disposing of illicit contraband, classified military equipment, or hazardous waste. This prohibition elevates environmental and safety considerations in disposal practices and requires the use of expanded expeditionary disposal capabilities instead of burn pits in contingency and other operations.
Funding and offset
For FY2026, the amount otherwise authorized for the Army’s Other Procurement, Army, shall be increased by $8,950,000 to fund solid waste disposal systems. In offset, the amount otherwise authorized for FY2026 for Operation and Maintenance, Army, Additional Activities, Overseas Operating Costs, shall be reduced by $8,950,000, with the reduction derived from amounts related to the use of open-air burn pits in contingency operations.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Defense across all five countries.
Explore Defense in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Department of Defense and Army procurement offices gain a defined authority and funding stream to deploy expeditionary waste disposal systems for contraband destruction.
- Military installations and forward operating bases gain access to disposal systems to manage waste and secure operations in austere environments.
- Partner security forces that collaborate with the U.S. on countering infiltration gain practical disposal assets.
- Border security and narcotics interdiction efforts benefit from a concrete capability to dispose of seized materials in a controlled manner.
- Defense contractors and manufacturers supplying expeditionary disposal equipment may see targeted procurement opportunities as a result of the funding.
Who Bears the Cost
- Army O&M budgets related to Additional Activities, Overseas Operating Costs are reduced by $8.95 million to offset the new procurement funding.
- The reallocation could constrain other Army or DoD programs funded within the affected accounts.
- Budgetary impact cascades through the Army’s budget line items that previously supported burn-pit-related activities, potentially affecting contingency operation funding allocations.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between enabling a new, deployable disposal capability to destroy illicit materials and the need to fund it without undercutting other critical Army programs, all while replacing burn-pit disposal with safer techniques in a way that is transparent and fiscally sustainable.
The bill creates a narrow, capability-focused reform: it gives DoD a concrete disposal tool for contraband and aligns funding to acquire it, while simultaneously seeking to eliminate open-air burn pits in the contexts specified. The political economy of the offset—shifting $8.95 million within Army accounts—could invite scrutiny if the burn-pit funds were deemed essential elsewhere or if the new disposal systems require ongoing maintenance costs beyond the initial procurement.
The text does not specify oversight mechanisms, environmental impact assessments, or long-term sustainment requirements for the expeditionary systems, leaving questions about lifecycle costs and compliance with environmental and safety standards.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.