This bill instructs the Secretary of the Interior to eliminate visible references to Francis G. Newlands on the memorial fountain at Chevy Chase Circle in Washington, D.C., either by removing the inscriptions and plaques or permanently concealing them.
It focuses narrowly on the wording and objects on the fountain rather than on relocating the structure or changing the site itself.
The measure also prescribes what happens to anything removed: the Secretary must offer the items to Newlands’ descendants for a limited period, and if they are not claimed they become Federal property and are entered into the National Park Service’s Rock Creek Park museum collection. The bill leaves operational decisions—how to physically remove or conceal, how to document the change, and who pays—to the agency implementing the directive.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires the Secretary of the Interior to remove a brass plaque, a stone tablet-style projection, and any carved occurrences of the name 'Newlands' from the fountain’s coping stones, or to permanently conceal those names. Mandates that removed objects be offered to the descendant(s) for a 60-day window and, if unclaimed, be retained as Federal property and accessioned into the Rock Creek Park museum collection.
Who It Affects
The National Park Service (Rock Creek Park unit) will carry out the physical work and curatorial accessioning; descendants of Francis G. Newlands get a 60-day right of first refusal; local stewards (DC agencies and neighborhood organizations) will see name references on a public memorial changed. Contractors, conservators, and museum staff will be operationally engaged.
Why It Matters
The bill is a narrowly targeted, statutory command to a federal agency that resolves both on-site treatment and disposition of removed material—an approach that removes ambiguity about who acts and how items are handled. It also creates a concrete administrative pathway for treating contested memorial inscriptions without broader site alterations.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The measure is short and focused. It gives a single, clear instruction to the Secretary of the Interior to address named inscriptions and related objects on one specific memorial fountain in northwest Washington, D.C.
The agency’s choices are limited to two outcomes for the lettering: physical removal or permanent concealment; the bill does not authorize dismantling the fountain or changing any other inscriptions.
For any physical objects taken off the site—the bill lists a brass plaque, a tablet-like stone projection, and carved lettering—the Secretary must attempt to transfer those items to Newlands’ descendants first. The statute sets a limited private claim period; if the descendants do not claim the items, the statute converts those objects into Federal property and requires their addition to the Rock Creek Park museum collection.
That process creates both a curatorial disposition and a custodial chain-of-title within NPS systems.The text is silent on financing, scheduling, or treatment standards. It also uses the phrase 'permanently conceal' without defining acceptable techniques (for example, in‑place filling, re-facing, or replacement), so the agency will have discretion on conservation and preservation methods.
Because the bill specifies accession into a named park museum collection, it imports NPS curatorial rules and accession procedures as the default post‑removal destination.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill specifically directs the Secretary of the Interior to act on inscriptions and objects associated with the Chevy Chase Circle memorial fountain in NW Washington, D.C.
It lists three discrete actions the Secretary must take: remove a brass plaque, remove a stone tablet-like projection, and remove or permanently conceal the name carved into the fountain’s coping stones.
The Secretary must offer any removed items to Francis G. Newlands’ descendants and give them 60 days to claim those items.
If the descendants do not claim the items within 60 days, the items become Federal property and must be accessioned into the National Park Service’s Rock Creek Park museum collection.
The statute defines the memorial fountain by street location (Chevy Chase Circle at Connecticut Avenue and Western Avenue NW), limiting the directive to that single site.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the Act’s citation as the 'Francis G. Newlands Memorial Removal Act.' This is a purely formal provision that establishes how the statute may be referenced in legal and administrative materials.
Mandated removal or concealment of specific inscriptions and objects
Enumerates the tangible items and lettering the Secretary must address: a brass plaque naming 'Senator Francis G. Newlands,' a stone tablet-like projection bearing 'Francis Griffith Newlands' and an inscription, and the carved 'Newlands' name in the coping stones. The language confines the agency’s action to either removal of those elements or their permanent concealment, giving NPS the choice of method but not the option to leave the names visible.
Disposition: offer to descendants, then accession
Requires the Secretary to offer removed items to Newlands’ descendants for 60 days. If unclaimed, the statute commands that the items be retained as Federal property and accessioned into the Rock Creek Park museum collection. Practically, that pulls the NPS collections and accession rules into play and creates a statutory disposition timetable and title transfer to the United States.
Definition of memorial fountain
Defines the statute’s geographic scope by street intersection and park unit reference—Chevy Chase Circle at Connecticut and Western Avenues NW—so the mandate applies only to this memorial fountain and not to other Newlands references or monuments elsewhere in the District or nation.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Local residents and community groups advocating for removal: they will see the contested name de‑emphasized or hidden at a local public site without a lengthy agency review process.
- Descendants of Francis G. Newlands: they receive a defined 60-day right to reclaim removed objects, preserving a private option for custody and family stewardship.
- National Park Service curators and Rock Creek Park museum staff: accessioning the items provides curatorial control for preservation, interpretation, and public access within a museum context.
- Historians and researchers: retention of removed objects in a federal collection preserves primary artifacts for study rather than destroying them.
Who Bears the Cost
- National Park Service (Rock Creek Park unit): NPS must plan and carry out the removal/concealment work, manage the 60-day offer period, and complete accessioning—activities that require staff time, conservation assessment, and potentially contractor services.
- Federal taxpayers (implicitly): the bill contains no appropriation, so operational and conservation expenses will need to be covered from existing NPS budgets or subsequent appropriations.
- Contractors and conservators: firms engaged to accomplish removal or concealment bear the technical burden and liability of working on a historic structure, including potential cost and risk if the work requires specialist conservation methods.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between removing a public honorific that many find offensive while preserving historical artifacts and the physical integrity of a historic structure: the bill solves the immediate symbolic problem by eliminating visible references, yet it delegates technical preservation choices to the implementing agency without resources or detailed standards, trading moral clarity for practical ambiguity.
The bill raises several practical and legal ambiguities that the implementing agency will need to resolve. First, 'permanently conceal' is undefined: options range from in‑place filling or infilling the carved letters, to applying a new facing stone, to covering with a plaque or metal plate.
Each method carries different preservation implications and potential criticism from architectural conservators because concealment can alter historic fabric without documentary mitigation. The statute does not require a conservation assessment, an interpretive plaque explaining the change, or public notice beyond the transfer offer to descendants.
Second, the statute makes the removed items Federal property if unclaimed, but it does not address liability or costs associated with the transfer to descendants (transport, conservation) nor the criteria for verifying descendant claims. Accession into the Rock Creek Park museum collection triggers NPS curatorial rules—provenance documentation, cataloging, storage, and possibly conservation treatment—none of which are funded or scheduled in the text.
Finally, because the Act singles out one memorial, it sets a narrow precedent: it resolves a local controversy legislatively rather than by agency policy, which could encourage future site-specific statutes or create expectations that Congress will act on similar monuments.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.