The Reliable Federal Infrastructure Act (HB4690) repeals select federal building energy efficiency performance standards and modifies certification rules to ensure fossil-fuel use does not automatically disqualify a building from green certification. It also introduces a transition framework that preserves the pre-reform regulatory posture until new standards are issued, and it adds a conforming amendment to the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to protect certification from fossil-fuel-based exclusion.
The bill directs the Secretary of Energy to issue new or revised regulations within 180 days to implement these changes.
At a Glance
What It Does
It repeals certain federal building energy performance standards and sets a transitional path, while prohibiting certification systems from excluding buildings solely on fossil-fuel use.
Who It Affects
Federal agencies and federally owned buildings, energy-efficiency program implementers, and entities pursuing federal green-building certifications.
Why It Matters
It signals a shift toward flexibility in federal building standards by removing some regulatory constraints and ensuring fossil-fuel use cannot automatically bar green certifications, all while mandating a regulatory rewrite.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Section 1 provides the short title of the act. Section 2, in multiple subsections, makes four core changes to federal building energy standards.
It repeals the most stringent parts of federal energy performance rules (Subpart B of Part 435 and Subpart B of Part 433 in Title 10). It also adds a clause to prevent green-building certifications from disqualifying buildings solely due to fossil-fuel consumption, ensuring that green ratings can still be earned even when fossil fuels are used.
The transition clause ensures the old framework remains in place until new regulations are issued, with the aim of carrying out the amendments as if the repealed subclauses never took effect. A conforming amendment to the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 codifies the fossil-fuel protection in certification.
Finally, the act requires the Secretary of Energy to publish new or revised regulations within 180 days of enactment to implement these changes.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill repeals Subpart B of Part 435 and Subpart B of Part 433 of Title 10 CFR.
The certification system may not prohibit a green certification based solely on fossil-fuel use.
Transition rules keep current standards in effect until new regulations are issued.
A conforming amendment to EISA 2007 protects fossil-fuel-based certifications.
DOE must publish new regulations within 180 days of enactment to implement the changes.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This Act may be cited as the Reliable Federal Infrastructure Act. The provision is a standard procedural step that frames the bill’s formal name and scope for implementation.
General repeal of core standards
Section 2(a)(1) eliminates subclauses I and II of the targeted energy performance subsection, narrowing the baseline regulation. Section 2(a)(2) inserts language ensuring that a building cannot be barred from green certification solely due to fossil-fuel consumption, embedding a fossil-fuel-inclusive principle in the certification framework.
Repeal and transition of standards
Section 2(b)(1) repeals Subpart B of Part 435 and Subpart B of Part 433 in Title 10 CFR, removing specific federal building efficiency requirements. Section 2(b)(2) creates a transition rule: until DOE issues new regulations, the revised section operates as if the pre-repeal subclauses had never taken effect, allowing for a smoother regulatory shift.
Conforming amendment
Section 2(c) adds a specific provision to Section 436(h) of EISA 2007 prohibiting a certification system from disqualifying a building solely based on fossil-fuel consumption, aligning the certification standard with the bill’s fossil-fuel-inclusive intent.
Regulatory revision deadline
Section 2(d) requires the Secretary of Energy to issue new or revised regulations within 180 days of enactment to implement the amendments in this act, establishing a concrete post-enactment regulatory timeline.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Energy across all five countries.
Explore Energy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Federal agencies and federally owned buildings benefit from reduced regulatory friction and potential cost savings during the transition.
- Entities pursuing green-building certification benefit from a policy that doesn’t disqualify projects simply for fossil-fuel use, preserving options for certification parity.
- Building owners and contractors may experience lower compliant burden as some stringent standards are repealed, and the transition provides a clearer path to updated regulations.
Who Bears the Cost
- Regulatory agencies within DOE bear the initial administrative cost and workload of issuing new regulations within a tight 180-day window.
- Energy efficiency program implementers and compliance consultants may need to adapt to the revised standards and new certification criteria, incurring transitional costs.
- Some stakeholders relying on the existing standards for strict energy performance gains could face a period of policy adjustment and potential short-term uncertainty during the transition.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether to prioritize immediate regulatory relief and flexibility (through repeal and transition) or to preserve strong energy efficiency gains and consistent certification criteria during the rewrite process.
The bill’s core tension is how to balance energy efficiency objectives with regulatory flexibility. By repealing certain standards, the government reduces immediate compliance costs and potential rigidity, but the absence of robust federal standards could dilute long-term energy-performance gains.
The transition clause and the fossil-fuel certification protection aim to prevent abrupt drops in green credentials while the DOE rewrites the regulatory framework, yet this creates a window where inconsistent implementation and interpretation may arise. The 180-day deadline concentrates regulatory work, which risks rushed rulemaking unless the department scales resources appropriately.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.