HB4987 would create federal standards for quality and discard date phrases on packaged foods. It requires that quality dates be introduced with a uniform label like BEST If Used By (BB allowed when space is tight) and that discard dates use USE By (UB allowed when space is tight).
The entity responsible for the label—under USDA for poultry/meat/eggs and FDA for other foods—decides whether to include these dates and which products get labeled. The act also allows optional use of technologies such as time-temperature indicators, QR codes, and other smart labels, and mandates conspicuous placement and a consistent date format.
A two-year implemention horizon follows enactment, with two-year delayed applicability for labels, plus a consumer education push from the administering Secretaries. The bill preempts divergent state requirements while preserving certain child nutrition and remedy provisions, and it establishes misbranding penalties for noncompliance.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill requires uniform quality and discard date phrases on food packaging, with BB/UB abbreviations permissible only where full phrases don’t fit. It allows rulemaking to adjust the phrases and enables use of additional labeling technology.
Who It Affects
Labeling is required for products under USDA and FDA oversight; manufacturers, packagers, and retailers must implement the standard phrases and formats on qualifying labels.
Why It Matters
Uniform phrases reduce consumer confusion, support safer handling, and guide donation decisions, while giving agencies a single baseline to enforce and reducing state-by-state labeling variation.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
This bill creates a federal standard for date labeling on packaged foods. When a quality date is used, it must be introduced with the uniform phrase BEST If Used By, unless the administering Secretaries approve another phrase by rulemaking.
When a discard date is used, it must begin with USE By, with a similar rulemaking pathway for alternative phrases. The label must be clear, in a readable type, and placed conspicuously on the package, with date formats limited to month-year or month-day-year.
Abbreviations BB and UB can be used only when space is too small for the full phrases. The act permits additional labeling technologies like QR codes and time-temperature indicators and requires education to consumers within two years of enactment.
Enforcement provisions link misbranding to updated sections of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and to poultry and egg products, with some carve-outs for infant formula. Regulations to implement these changes must be issued within two years, and the law applies to labels on foods produced two years after enactment.
The bill also preserves existing state rights to regulate donations and conflicts, while clarifying the preemption of conflicting labeling rules at the federal level.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The uniform quality date phrase is the default: BEST If Used By, with BB as an abbreviation only when space is tight.
The uniform discard date phrase is USE By, with UB as an abbreviation only when space is tight.
Labeling decisions are at the entity responsible for the food label, subject to federal rulemaking.
Labeling must be in easy-to-read type, with month-year or month-day-year formats for dates.
A two-year delay applies before the act's labeling requirements take effect, with a parallel consumer education effort.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
Establishes the act’s common reference as the Food Date Labeling Act of 2025. This sets the framework for the definitions, date phrases, and enforcement provisions that follow.
Definitions
Defines key terms: administering Secretaries (USDA for poultry/meat/eggs; HHS for other foods), discard date phrase, and quality date phrase. It also sets the jurisdictional scope for which products fall under which secretary.
Quality Date Phrases and Discard Date Phrases
Outlines the default uniform phrases for quality dates (BEST If Used By) and discard dates (USE By), with space-based abbreviations (BB, UB) allowed under tight packaging. Authorizes coordinated rulemaking to adjust these phrases and confirms that labeling decisions rest with the label owner.
Misbranding
Adds new misbranding provisions tying noncompliance with quality or discard date labeling to FDA and USDA enforcement, including poultry, meat, and egg products. Provides the legal hook to address misleading or absent date labeling on labeled foods.
Regulations
Requires the administering Secretaries to issue final regulations within two years to implement the act’s labeling requirements and standards, in coordination with each other.
Delayed Applicability
Delays the act’s applicability by two years from enactment, providing a transition period for industry readers to adjust labeling systems and for regulators to finalize standards.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Consumers and households gain clearer, more predictable date information that supports safer handling and reduces waste.
- Food manufacturers and packagers benefit from a single federal standard, potentially lowering compliance costs and reducing labeling disputes.
- Retailers and distributors face clearer labeling requirements, lowering risk of misbranding and recall events.
- Federal agencies (FDA and USDA) gain a unified enforcement framework and a clear baseline for oversight.
Who Bears the Cost
- Small and mid-size food producers may incur labeling redesign and system updates.
- Retailers and distributors must refresh packaging and labeling systems to comply, including potential IT and label-stock changes.
- Labeling technology providers and suppliers of QR codes or time-temperature indicators may experience demand for updated labeling solutions.
- Federal agencies will need resources to develop, implement, and enforce the new standards and regulations.
- States may adjust to the preemption framework, potentially reducing their own labeling rulemaking but incurring transitional compliance costs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is balancing rapid, nationwide clarity in date labeling with the practical costs of updating labeling systems and ensuring consistent implementation across thousands of products, all while allowing states to retain some authority during the transition and preserving access to safe food donations.
The act promises clearer labeling, but the transition introduces implementation and cost risks for the labeling ecosystem. Smaller players may bear a disproportionate burden to redesign packaging, update ERP and labeling software, and revise supplier contracts.
The allowance of abbreviations and alternate labeling technologies could create confusion if not harmonized across products and packaging formats. While the act preempts conflicting state rules, it also raises questions about how quickly enforcement will scale for all food products, and how the two-year delay interacts with existing donation practices and food safety standards.
The education requirement aims to mitigate consumer confusion, but it will depend on effective outreach and measurable outcomes.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.