The INFORM Act of 2025 requires the Department of Homeland Security to notify an immigration detainee’s immediate family within 24 hours whenever the detainee is moved to a different facility. The required notice must state the reason for the transfer and provide the name, address, telephone number, and a point of contact for the receiving facility.
This is a narrowly focused transparency measure aimed at reducing time families spend searching for transferred detainees and improving lines of communication between facilities, families, and counsel or advocates. The bill also defines who counts as "immediate family" and what counts as a "facility," which matter for implementation but leave several operational questions open (recordkeeping, verification, and enforcement).
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill obligates the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide notice to an immigrant detainee’s immediate family no later than 24 hours after the detainee is transferred to any other facility; the notice must include why the transfer occurred and full contact information for the receiving facility.
Who It Affects
The rule applies to DHS‑detained individuals (ICE and other DHS detention operations) and their immediate family members as defined in the bill (parents, siblings, children, spouses and comparable relationships). It also creates operational duties for facility operators — including private contractors hosting detainees — and for DHS offices that coordinate transfers.
Why It Matters
The bill changes information flow in the immigration detention system: families and advocates get a near‑real‑time cue when a transfer happens, which can reduce lost‑contact incidents and improve legal access. It also imposes a short, uniform timing requirement that will force agencies and contractors to redesign communication and record systems if they aren’t already capturing and transmitting this data.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The INFORM Act establishes a simple statutory duty: when the Secretary of Homeland Security moves an individual detained under the immigration laws from one facility to another, DHS must notify that individual’s immediate family within 24 hours. Notice must say why the person was moved and must give the receiving facility’s name, address, telephone number, and a designated point of contact.
The statute adopts explicit definitions for "immediate family" and "facility," which determine who receives notice and which kinds of locations trigger the duty.
"Immediate family" is written broadly: parents, siblings, children, and spouses are covered, and the bill explicitly brings step‑relations, foster parents or children, and relationships formed through common law marriage, civil unions, or domestic partnerships into the definition. "Facility" is likewise broad, covering detention centers and any real property temporarily used to house individuals detained under the immigration laws. Those definitions matter because they fix both the notice recipients and the universe of moves that create an obligation.The bill does not specify a delivery method for notice (mail, phone, email, text), nor does it create a penalty, private right of action, or administrative enforcement mechanism if DHS fails to notify.
It also does not require notice to attorneys, sponsors, or non‑immediate family members unless they fall within the statutory family categories. Practically, implementation will require DHS and detention operators to track contact information for designated family members, log transfer reasons in a form that can be communicated, and designate facility points of contact who will accept incoming inquiries from families.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires DHS to provide notice to an immigrant detainee’s immediate family not later than 24 hours after a transfer to a different facility.
Required notice content is limited to (1) the reason for the transfer and (2) the receiving facility’s name, address, phone number, and a point of contact.
The statute defines "immediate family" to include parents, siblings, children, spouses, step‑parents/children, foster parents/children, and relationships from common‑law marriages, civil unions, or domestic partnerships.
The term "facility" covers detention centers and any real property temporarily used to house individuals detained under the immigration laws, which captures ad hoc or emergency housing.
The bill imposes the notice duty on individuals detained "by the Secretary of Homeland Security pursuant to the immigration laws," thereby covering DHS detention programs (including ICE operations) without creating penalties or an explicit enforcement pathway in the text.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the act’s name: "Immigration Notification for Facility Oversight and Relocation Management Act of 2025" (the INFORM Act). This is purely titular but signals the bill’s intent to couple relocation (transfer) practices with oversight and family notification.
Notice requirement for transfers
Imposes the core substantive duty: when a person detained by DHS under the immigration laws is transferred to a different facility, DHS must notify the detainee’s immediate family within 24 hours. The provision specifies the two elements the notice must contain (reason for transfer; receiving facility contact information). Practically, this section creates a hard timing requirement that will drive process changes in how transfers are logged, how family contact information is maintained, and how facilities assign points of contact to receive family inquiries.
Definitions of "immediate family" and "facility"
Sets out who must receive notice and which move scenarios trigger the duty. The "immediate family" definition is expansive—covering biological and many non‑biological family relationships—reducing disputes about who qualifies to receive notice. The "facility" definition explicitly includes temporary real property used to house detainees, which pulls ad hoc or short‑term holding locations into coverage. These definitions narrow disputes about scope but also create operational work: agencies must collect and maintain appropriate family contact data before transfers occur.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Immigration across all five countries.
Explore Immigration in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Immediate family members of detainees — They gain prompt information about where a loved one was moved and why, shortening the time families spend searching and enabling faster contact with counsel or consulates.
- Attorneys and legal representatives — Faster notification helps counsel locate clients for hearings, bond proceedings, or case management and reduces missed appearances due to lost contact.
- Advocacy groups and consular services — Organizations that monitor detainee welfare can respond more quickly when transfers occur and coordinate support or monitoring at the receiving facility.
- Compliance and oversight officers — DHS and oversight entities get a statutory baseline that can be used to measure agency responsiveness and track patterns of transfers across facilities.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Homeland Security (ICE and related components) — DHS must build or adapt systems to collect and transmit family contact details, record transfer reasons in releasable form, and meet the 24‑hour window, creating operational and personnel costs.
- Detention facility operators (public and private) — Facilities must maintain a designated point of contact, accept incoming communications from families, and update public‑facing or interagency directories, increasing administrative workload.
- Private contractors running ad hoc or temporary holding locations — Because the bill captures "real property temporarily used" to house detainees, contractors who provide surge capacity will face notification responsibilities they may not have anticipated.
- Families and community organizations — While they benefit from notice, some family members may face safety or privacy risks when notified and may need to take steps (legal or practical) to protect themselves if contact could be harmful.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill balances two legitimate goals—family transparency and operational security—but does so with a blunt instrument: a uniform 24‑hour notice duty. That duty improves family access and oversight but forces DHS and facility operators to reconcile security, privacy, and logistical constraints on short notice, without statutory guidance on method, exceptions, or enforcement.
The statute’s simplicity is its strength and its central implementation problem. It sets a bright‑line 24‑hour window but leaves delivery method, recordkeeping standards, verification, and enforcement unspecified.
Agencies must decide whether an automated text, phone call, certified mail, or other method satisfies the requirement; each choice carries tradeoffs for reliability, privacy, and proof of delivery. The Act’s silence on remedies—no civil cause of action, no administrative penalty, and no appropriations language—means compliance will likely depend on internal DHS policy, contract terms with private operators, or future rulemaking.
Practical ambiguities invite operational workarounds. "Reason for transfer" is undefined: will DHS be required to provide specific operational or security rationales, or will generic categories (medical, ICE‑directed, operational) suffice? The "facility" definition includes temporary real property, which captures emergency or surge housing but could create perverse incentives to classify a move as an internal re‑assignment rather than a transfer to a separate facility.
Finally, broad inclusion of step, foster, and non‑traditional relationships simplifies access but raises privacy and safety questions for survivors of domestic violence or others for whom notification could create risk; the bill has no carve‑outs or protective procedures for sensitive cases.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.