The bill amends 15 U.S.C. § 638 (section 9 of the Small Business Act) to let federal agencies award grants or enter partnerships enabling small businesses that have received Phase II SBIR or STTR awards to provide fellowship and internship positions at the undergraduate, baccalaureate, graduate, and postdoctoral levels. Agencies must conduct enhanced outreach to increase participation by women, socially disadvantaged individuals (per section 8(a)(5)), and economically disadvantaged individuals (per section 8(a)(6)(A)), and may contract with nonprofit support organizations to carry out that outreach.
Practically, the measure creates an explicit workforce-development pathway inside the SBIR/STTR architecture while capping funding flexibility: agencies that lack a separate authority may allocate no more than 3% of the funds they are required to expend under the program toward these fellowships; agencies with an existing subsection (mm) authority may use funds authorized under that subsection instead. The change applies in parallel to both SBIR and STTR provisions, so the fellowship authority is available across both programs.
At a Glance
What It Does
Permits federal agencies to provide grants or partner with third parties so Phase II SBIR/STTR awardees can host paid fellowship and internship positions for undergraduates through postdocs in agency-relevant fields. It requires enhanced outreach to specified disadvantaged groups and allows agencies to fund nonprofit intermediaries to run outreach.
Who It Affects
Phase II SBIR and STTR award recipients, federal agencies that administer SBIR/STTR funds, nonprofit intermediary organizations, and prospective fellows (undergraduate, baccalaureate, graduate, postdoctoral). It also affects agency SBIR/STTR program offices that will oversee use and allocation of program dollars.
Why It Matters
The bill formally makes workforce development an allowable use of SBIR/STTR-related funding, tying talent pipelines to commercialization-stage small businesses. That creates new program design and compliance questions for agencies and awardees, and it channels a portion of R&D-related funds into training and recruitment with statutory outreach priorities.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The core change is straightforward: federal agencies may now enable small businesses that previously won a Phase II SBIR or STTR award to host fellows and interns across academic stages — from undergraduates through postdoctoral researchers — in technical fields that matter to the agency. The authority applies whether the agency issues grants directly to the small business or enters partnerships with third parties to support those placements.
The bill layers equity requirements onto that authority. Agencies must undertake “enhanced outreach” aimed at boosting participation by women, socially disadvantaged persons (as defined elsewhere in the Small Business Act), and economically disadvantaged persons.
To operationalize outreach, agencies can partner with — and provide funding to — nonprofit organizations that demonstrate relevant experience delivering outreach and related services.Funding is constrained. Agencies that possess a distinct authority under subsection (mm) may use funds made available under that specific authority to support fellowships.
Agencies that do not have that authority may devote no more than three percent of the program funds they are already required to expend under the applicable paragraph of section 9 toward these fellowship activities. The bill inserts near-identical fellowship language into two places in section 9 so the authority exists in both SBIR and STTR contexts.What the bill does not do is prescribe selection criteria for fellows, define the terms of appointment (employee vs. trainee), specify intellectual property or data rights for work performed by fellows, or create a federal reporting framework for measuring outcomes.
Those implementation details will fall to agency rulemaking or program-level design decisions once the authority is exercised.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill authorizes federal agencies to fund fellowships and internships hosted by small businesses that received SBIR or STTR Phase II awards for students and postdocs in fields important to the agency.
Agencies must provide enhanced outreach to increase participation by women, socially disadvantaged individuals (per 8(a)(5)), and economically disadvantaged individuals (per 8(a)(6)(A)).
Agencies may partner with or fund nonprofit support organizations to conduct the required outreach, but those intermediaries must be nonprofits with demonstrated relevant experience.
Funding is limited: agencies with subsection (mm) authority may use funds authorized under that subsection; other agencies may spend no more than 3% of the funds they are required to expend under the program toward these fellowship activities.
The same fellowship authority is added in parallel to the SBIR and STTR provisions (two separate insertions into subsection (f) and subsection (n) of section 9).
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title: SBIR/STTR Innovation Workforce Act
This is the bill’s caption; it establishes workforce development as the stated purpose framing the amendments that follow. The short title signals legislative intent to link the SBIR/STTR commercialization pipeline to talent-building activities.
Authorizes fellowships through SBIR Phase II awardees
Subsection (f) of section 9 receives a new paragraph permitting federal agencies to make grants or enter partnerships so SBIR Phase II awardees can host fellows and interns at undergraduate, baccalaureate, graduate, and postdoctoral levels. The provision imposes an affirmative outreach duty and allows agencies to fund nonprofit intermediaries; it also specifies funding sources and a percentage cap for agencies without subsection (mm) authority. Practically, SBIR program managers will need to adapt award terms and oversight to govern third‑party partnerships and fellowship arrangements.
Mirrors the SBIR change for STTR awardees
The bill adds substantially the same paragraph to subsection (n), bringing STTR Phase II awardees under the same fellowship authority and outreach requirements. Because STTR is structured around small business–research institution partnerships, agencies and awardees will need to coordinate roles between small businesses and their research partners when placing fellows or running internship programs.
Two funding buckets and a 3% cap for many agencies
The text creates two permissible funding sources. Agencies that can use funds pursuant to subsection (mm) may draw on those authorized amounts for fellowships. Agencies without that authority may use only up to 3% of the funds they are required to expend under the referenced paragraph of section 9. That 3% cap is a statutory ceiling; the bill does not define allocation mechanics, timing, or whether the cap is calculated annually or across multiple fiscal years, leaving implementation details to agencies.
Mandatory enhanced outreach and nonprofit intermediaries
Each agency must include enhanced outreach focused on women and certain disadvantaged groups. Agencies may meet that duty by partnering with nonprofit organizations that have demonstrated experience in the relevant outreach services; the bill requires nonprofit status and relevant expertise but does not specify procurement or conflict-of-interest rules. Agencies will therefore need to create selection criteria and oversight for intermediaries to ensure outreach goals are met without running afoul of federal grant or ethics requirements.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Science across all five countries.
Explore Science in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Phase II SBIR/STTR award recipients — gain an explicit statutory pathway and potential funding to host paid fellows and interns, which can help small firms access talent for development and commercialization work.
- Students and postdoctoral researchers from targeted groups — receive expanded paid training and industry exposure opportunities through placements at commercialization-focused small businesses.
- Nonprofit intermediary organizations with outreach expertise — become eligible for grants or contracts to recruit and prepare underrepresented fellows for placements, creating a new market for capacity-building services.
- Federal agencies seeking workforce pipelines — can leverage program dollars to meet talent needs in mission‑relevant technical fields without creating a separate fellowship program outside the SBIR/STTR structure.
Who Bears the Cost
- SBIR/STTR program offices and agency managers — will shoulder administrative and oversight burdens to design fellowship terms, manage third-party partners, ensure compliance with outreach obligations, and track use of capped funds.
- Phase II small businesses hosting fellows — must allocate staff time, workspace, and supervision resources; smaller firms may find these operational costs burdensome without clear reimbursement mechanisms.
- Federal agencies without subsection (mm) authority — face a fiscal trade-off because deploying up to 3% of required program funds toward fellowships reduces the pool available for direct R&D or other programmatic uses.
- Nonprofits that lack scale or experience — may need to invest in capacity to meet the bill’s demonstrated-expertise requirement, which could exclude smaller community groups unless agencies design outreach to build capacity.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is this: the bill aims to expand talent pipelines by channeling SBIR/STTR resources into paid fellowships, but doing so reallocates scarce R&D‑focused funds and embeds equity outreach obligations without clear operational guardrails — forcing agencies and awardees to balance workforce-development benefits against potential dilution of the programs’ core R&D and commercialization purposes.
The bill opens SBIR/STTR money to workforce development but leaves many implementation details unspecified. It does not define how agencies should measure ‘enhanced outreach,’ set selection criteria for fellows, treat fellows as employees versus trainees, or address intellectual property and data rights arising from fellows’ work.
Those gaps create administrative discretion that will determine how effectively outreach goals are met and how much program dollars actually reach participants versus administrative overhead.
The funding mechanics create potential inequities across agencies. Those with subsection (mm) authority can use separate authorized funds and may implement larger or different fellowship models; others are limited to a 3% cap relative to funds required to be expended under section 9.
The statute does not clarify whether the 3% limit applies per fiscal year, per program, or per award cycle, nor does it specify whether funds diverted for fellowships reduce other statutorily required set-asides. That ambiguity will require agencies to issue guidance or rulemaking and may produce uneven program designs across agencies and mission areas.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.