The Gateway Partnership Act authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to enter into an agreement with the Gateway Arch Park Foundation to host private events in Gateway Arch National Park buildings, including the Arch Visitor Center and the Old Courthouse. The agreement must include limits on timing and frequency, appropriate NPS staffing, liability insurance naming the United States as additionally insured, a clause insulating Federal employees from liability for injuries arising from Foundation use, and fees to cover wear-and-tear and other costs.
This bill creates a narrow statutory framework to permit a nonprofit philanthropic partner to manage and monetize special events inside prominent public buildings while preserving National Park Service authority to host or permit other events. For park managers, local vendors, and compliance officers, the measure shifts several operational decisions—fee setting, staffing, and risk allocation—into a formal agreement that still leaves important implementation details to the Secretary of the Interior.
At a Glance
What It Does
Authorizes the Secretary to strike an agreement with the Gateway Arch Park Foundation to host private events in defined Park buildings. The agreement must set exclusive-use dates/times (if any), cap events per week, ensure National Park Service staffing, require liability insurance naming the United States as additionally insured, and permit recovery of maintenance, administrative, and personnel costs through fees.
Who It Affects
Directly affects the Gateway Arch Park Foundation, National Park Service staff who will staff and administer events, private event organizers and vendors seeking access to Park buildings, and visitors whose access could be limited during private events.
Why It Matters
The bill formalizes a public-private pathway for monetizing national park spaces while preserving NPS permitting authority, creating a template for other philanthropic partnerships and raising practical questions about public access, preservation risk, and how fees and liability will be administered.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act defines its terms up front: ‘‘Park buildings’’ explicitly include the Arch Visitor Center and the Old Courthouse and also covers any other Park building open to the public. That definition is important because it frames which facilities the Secretary may authorize for private use under the agreement.
The Secretary may enter into a written agreement with the Gateway Arch Park Foundation to host private events in the Park and use Park buildings. The agreement can grant the Foundation exclusive authority to hold special events in specified buildings at specified dates and times, but the statute requires the Secretary to build in protective terms—limits on when and how often events occur, and an explicit cap on the number of events per week.Operational controls are spelled out in practical terms: the agreement must account for National Park Service staffing needs during events, require liability insurance sufficient to protect federal interests and name the United States as additionally insured, and include an express statement that the Federal Government and its employees will not be held liable for injuries or deaths resulting from Foundation occupancy and use of the buildings.
The Secretary must charge fees that cover wear-and-tear and may recover all costs—administrative and personnel—associated with the private events.Finally, the Act preserves existing NPS authority: it does not prevent the Service from hosting its own events or issuing permits to other groups. The measure therefore creates a specific contracting option with the Park’s philanthropic partner while leaving the broader permitting system in place; however, the bill leaves numerous implementation details—fee schedules, insurance minimums, monitoring for preservation impacts and public-notice procedures—to the Secretary’s discretion and the actual agreement negotiated with the Foundation.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Act defines ‘‘Park building’’ to include the Arch Visitor Center and the Old Courthouse and extends to any other Park building open to the public.
The Secretary may make the Foundation the exclusive organization authorized to hold special events in specified Park buildings during specified dates and times.
An agreement must set a maximum number of events per week and require appropriate National Park Service staffing for those events.
The Foundation must carry liability insurance adequate to protect United States interests and list the United States as additionally insured; the agreement must include a provision stating the Federal Government and its employees will not be held liable for injuries or deaths resulting from Foundation occupancy.
The Secretary must charge fees to cover maintenance and wear-and-tear and may recover all costs—including administrative and personnel costs—related to the private events; the NPS remains able to host or permit other events.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This one-line provision names the statute the ‘‘Gateway Partnership Act of 2025.’
Definitions — scope of covered buildings and parties
Section 2 sets the vocabulary the rest of the Act relies on. By listing the Arch Visitor Center and Old Courthouse by name and capturing any other building administered or managed by the Secretary that is open to the public, the definition limits the scope to publicly accessible Park facilities. It also codifies the Gateway Arch Park Foundation as the specific nonprofit counterparty, which narrows the statute’s application to one philanthropic partner rather than opening the door to arbitrary third parties.
Authorization to enter into an agreement with the Foundation
Subsection (a) gives the Secretary discretionary authority to enter into a formal agreement with the Foundation to host private events and use Park buildings. The authority is permissive—not mandatory—so the Secretary retains a threshold decision about whether to negotiate such an agreement at all. The subsection does not prescribe the length or form of the agreement, leaving term, renewal, and termination mechanics to the negotiated contract and implementing regulations or policies.
Required terms and protections
Subsection (b) lists minimum contractual terms the Secretary must include: specific dates and times for any exclusive use, a cap on events per week, requirements for National Park Service staffing, liability insurance naming the United States as additionally insured, an express non-liability clause for Federal employees, and a catch-all allowing the Secretary to add terms he or she considers appropriate. Practically, this directs the Secretary to build a risk-management and operational framework into the deal but leaves quantitative elements (insurance limits, staffing ratios) to negotiation.
Use limits, fee recovery, and preservation of NPS authority
These subsections constrain allowable private-event activities to those consistent with the Park’s purposes and compatible with NPS programs, forbid uses that would degrade the Park’s integrity or appearance, and bar events that would disrupt public access. They require the Secretary to charge fees that cover wear-and-tear and permit recovery of administrative and personnel costs. Crucially, subsection (e) clarifies that the bill does not preclude the National Park Service from hosting its own events or issuing permits to other applicants, which preserves the broader permitting system even if the Foundation receives exclusive authorizations for certain times or spaces.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Gateway Arch Park Foundation — Gains a statutory vehicle to secure exclusive private-event rights in key park buildings, deepening fundraising potential and programmatic control over special events.
- National Park Service (Park management) — Gains a contractual mechanism to recoup direct and indirect costs of events (wear-and-tear, staffing, administration) and to delegate event logistics to a stable philanthropic partner.
- Local tourism and event vendors — Stand to win increased business from more frequent, larger, or higher-profile events held on park grounds if contracts include vendor access or procurement opportunities.
- Park facilities and maintenance budgets — Could receive steadier funding tied to event fees, reducing dependence on annual appropriations for certain maintenance tied to events.
Who Bears the Cost
- General public and regular visitors — Face the risk of restricted access or altered park experience when private events occupy buildings or grounds during peak times.
- Competing event organizers and local nonprofits — May lose access or face higher costs if the Foundation exercises exclusive rights or if fee recovery raises the price of renting park spaces.
- National Park Service staff — Must absorb planning, scheduling, and on-site staffing responsibilities for events and enforce contract terms, potentially increasing operational workload without specified new staffing resources.
- Preservation and conservation stakeholders — Bear the long-term conservation risk from increased wear-and-tear; while fees are charged for maintenance, the bill leaves monitoring and thresholds for 'degradation' undefined.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is a choice between unlocking private revenue and operational capacity via an exclusive philanthropic partnership, and the risk that private events will limit public access, strain preservation goals, and shift NPS priorities—an outcome the bill attempts to mitigate through contractual safeguards but which ultimately depends on how the Secretary defines and enforces those safeguards.
The Act delegates substantial implementation detail to the Secretary and the negotiated agreement, which raises immediate operational and legal questions. The statute requires liability insurance and an express non-liability clause for Federal employees, but it does not specify minimum insurance amounts, standards for determining ‘‘sufficient’’ coverage, or how indemnities interact with existing Federal tort and indemnification law.
That gap leaves room for dispute over whether an insurance policy will truly protect the United States and how claims arising from vendor or attendee injuries will be litigated or settled.
The bill permits exclusive use by the Foundation for specified times and caps events per week, but it provides no public-notice, transparency, or competitive-process requirements for awarding exclusivity. It also leaves undefined what activities are ‘‘consistent with the purposes of the Park’’ or what level of impact constitutes degradation of the Park’s integrity or appearance.
These subjective standards create potential for conflict between fundraising goals and preservation obligations. Finally, by allowing full recovery of administrative and personnel costs through fees without a statutory fee-setting framework or oversight mechanism, the Act could produce disputes over fee levels, cross-subsidization, and whether revenue is reinvested in preservation or diverted elsewhere.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.