Codify — Article

Inaugural Fund Integrity Act: restricts non‑individual and foreign funding, adds donor caps and fast reporting

Creates new FECA section for Inaugural Committees: bars corporate/foreign gifts, limits individual giving, and forces 24‑hour and post‑inaugural accounting.

The Brief

This bill adds a new section to the Federal Election Campaign Act that changes how Inaugural Committees are funded and reported. It bars donations from entities that are not natural persons and from foreign nationals, creates a statutory limit on individual giving to inaugural funds, and requires time‑sensitive public reporting of large contributions and a comprehensive post‑inaugural accounting of receipts and disbursements.

For practitioners, the bill shifts the compliance baseline for any committee that wants to hold the formal status of an Inaugural Committee under 36 U.S.C. chapter 5: committees must agree to and meet the new FECA requirements or forfeit that designation. The measure increases transparency but also creates new operational responsibilities for committees, donors, and the FEC — and it becomes effective for inaugurations beginning in 2029.

At a Glance

What It Does

Adds section 325 to FECA establishing source prohibitions (non‑individuals and foreign nationals), an individual aggregate donation cap that is indexed starting in 2032, and new disclosure obligations including 24‑hour reports for larger donations and a 90‑day final accounting of all donations and disbursements.

Who It Affects

Official Inaugural Committees recognized under 36 U.S.C. chapter 5, individuals who donate to those committees, the FEC (reporting and enforcement), and nonprofits that may receive leftover inaugural funds.

Why It Matters

The bill closes a route for corporate and foreign funding of high‑profile inaugural activity and forces near‑real‑time transparency on major donors, altering fundraising strategies and compliance workflows around presidential transitions.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill creates a distinct FECA regime for Inaugural Committees by inserting a new section that both narrows who can give and expands what committees must disclose. It makes it unlawful for a committee to solicit or accept donations from any non‑individual (for example, corporations, PACs, LLCs) and from foreign nationals; it also prohibits donations in another person’s name and bars converting donated funds into expenditures that would exist irrespective of the committee’s responsibilities.

The text separately clarifies that disbursement of unused funds to 501(c)(3) charities remains permissible.

On limits and indexing, the bill sets a statutory aggregate limit on individual giving to an Inaugural Committee at $50,000. That dollar cap is subject to indexed increases beginning in the 2032 presidential election year using the same cumulative percent change formula FECA applies elsewhere, with rounding to the nearest $1,000.

The statute ties the restriction to donations “to an Inaugural Committee,” which operationally will require rules about whether the cap is per committee or across multiple committees that serve the same inauguration.The disclosure regime is two‑tiered. First, committees must file with the FEC within 24 hours any individual donation of $1,000 or more, providing donor name, address, amount, and date.

Second, within 90 days after the presidential inaugural ceremony the committee must file a final report listing all donors who gave $200 or more (amount, date, name, address), a totals breakdown of disbursements by category (operating expenses, loan repayments, donation refunds, other), and the names and addresses of recipients who received more than $200, including dates, amounts and, for operating expenses, the purpose.The bill also amends chapter 5 of title 36 so that a committee will not be treated as the Inaugural Committee for chapter 5 purposes unless it agrees to and meets the new FECA requirements. Two technical edits to FECA reporting provisions are made to accommodate the new section.

Finally, the statute contains an explicit effective date: these requirements apply to inaugural committees established for inaugurations held in 2029 and thereafter.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill makes it unlawful for an Inaugural Committee to solicit or accept donations from any person that is not an individual (for example, corporations, unions, PACs, LLCs).

2

Foreign nationals are explicitly barred from directly or indirectly making—or promising to make—donations to an Inaugural Committee.

3

An individual may not give, in the aggregate, more than $50,000 to an Inaugural Committee; that cap will be indexed beginning in 2032 and rounded to the nearest $1,000.

4

Committees must file a 24‑hour FEC report for any individual donation of $1,000 or more listing donor name, address, amount, and date; a comprehensive final report is due within 90 days after the inaugural ceremony.

5

The bill conditions a committee’s legal status under 36 U.S.C. chapter 5 on agreeing to and meeting these FECA requirements, and the law applies to inaugurations beginning in 2029.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1

Short title

Designates the Act as the “Inaugural Fund Integrity Act.” This is purely nominal but signals the bill’s focus on inaugural fundraising integrity.

Section 2 — New FECA §325(a)

Prohibitions on source and form of donations

Creates the core prohibitions: an Inaugural Committee cannot solicit or accept donations from non‑individual persons or from foreign nationals; it also prohibits making donations in another person’s name, knowingly accepting such disguised donations, and converting donated funds to personal use. The bill defines conversion to personal use as spending donated money on obligations that would exist regardless of the committee’s responsibilities, giving an enforcement hook to challenge self‑dealing. It preserves an express carve‑out allowing committees to give unused funds to 501(c)(3) charities.

Section 2 — New FECA §325(b)

Individual aggregate donation cap and indexing

Imposes a $50,000 aggregate cap on individual donations to an Inaugural Committee. The provision requires the cap to be indexed at the start of each presidential election year beginning in 2032 using the FECA cumulative percent‑change formula and rounded to the nearest $1,000. The statutory language uses the phrase “to an Inaugural Committee,” which will be operative in determining whether the limit applies per committee or across multiple committees associated with the same inauguration.

3 more sections
Section 2 — New FECA §325(c)

Reporting: 24‑hour reports and 90‑day final accounting

Establishes a near‑real‑time disclosure obligation (filed with the FEC within 24 hours) for any individual donation of $1,000 or more, requiring donor name and address, amount, and date. It also requires a full final report within 90 days after the inauguration that lists donors at the $200 threshold, aggregates and categorizes disbursements (operating expenses, loan repayments, refunds, other), and identifies recipients of disbursements over $200 with dates, amounts and, for operating expenses, purposes. That combination of rapid interim reporting plus a granular post‑event accounting increases transparency but also creates immediate operational and data‑management requirements.

Section 2 — New FECA §325(d) and conforming edits

Definitions and statutory alignment

Defines key terms: expands the statutory meaning of “donation,” excludes volunteer services from that definition, imports the FECA definition of foreign national, and references the 36 U.S.C. definition of Inaugural Committee. The bill also removes a subsection of FECA section 304 and redesignates another subsection to harmonize reporting rules, and amends 36 U.S.C. §510 to require a committee to accept these new FECA obligations before it can be treated as the Inaugural Committee under chapter 5.

Section 2 — Effective date

Applicability to inaugurations

Specifies that the new requirements apply to inaugural committees for inaugurations held in 2029 and any succeeding year, giving an explicit temporal cutoff and allowing one interim transition cycle.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Elections across all five countries.

Explore Elections in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Journalists, watchdogs, and the public — Faster (24‑hour) reporting for donations of $1,000+ and a required $200 threshold final accounting give watchdogs earlier and fuller visibility into who is funding inaugural activity.
  • 501(c)(3) charities that receive leftover funds — The statute explicitly permits disbursing unused inaugural funds to tax‑exempt charities, which preserves a channel for surplus funds to move to nonprofit causes.
  • Competing political actors and transparency advocates — The ban on non‑individual and foreign funding reduces a fundraising advantage tied to corporate or foreign money and levels certain aspects of the field for those concerned about outside influence.

Who Bears the Cost

  • Inaugural Committees and their finance teams — New real‑time reporting, donor vetting to block foreign and non‑individual sources, recordkeeping at the $200 level and the 24‑hour filing requirement will increase administrative and legal compliance costs.
  • High‑capacity individual donors — The $50,000 aggregate cap constrains major individual funders who previously provided large sums, forcing donor strategy changes or reallocations to other vehicles.
  • The Federal Election Commission — The FEC must process 24‑hour reports, enforce new donation‑source prohibitions and caps, and likely issue guidance; this will require staff time and rulemaking resources.
  • Nonprofit vendors and payees — The $200 reporting threshold for disbursements means small vendors and contractors who receive payments from inaugural committees may see their identities and payments disclosed and may need to respond to record requests.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central dilemma is between closing channels for undue influence and ensuring rapid, usable transparency on one hand, and imposing real‑time verification and reporting burdens that may be costly, ambiguous in application, and intrusive for routine vendors and donors on the other; the bill reduces certain integrity risks but shifts costs and compliance complexity onto committees, donors, and the agency meant to oversee them.

The bill is clear about source bans and reporting deadlines but leaves important implementation questions unresolved. It ties the aggregate individual cap to donations “to an Inaugural Committee,” which creates ambiguity when multiple committees operate around the same inauguration (for example, separate official, charitable, or private committees).

The statutory text does not specify whether aggregation is per official committee, across all committees serving the inauguration, or across committees that share common officers or bank accounts. The FEC (or Congress in follow‑on guidance) will need to define aggregation rules, attribution across committees, and treatment of joint fundraising arrangements.

Operationally, the 24‑hour reporting requirement for $1,000+ donations imposes an acute timing burden on committees and the FEC. Committees must verify donor identity and eligibility (checking foreign‑national status and entity type) within a very short window; real‑time identity verification systems and clear procedures will be necessary.

The bill’s anti‑conversion language targets self‑dealing but relies on a facts‑and‑circumstances standard (“obligations that would exist irrespective of the responsibilities of the Inaugural Committee”), which courts or the FEC will likely need to interpret. Finally, the combination of low‑threshold disbursement reporting ($200) and the public nature of those disclosures raises privacy concerns for small vendors and volunteers and could create compliance headaches for committees that routinely make small payments during event production.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.