This bill, the Wildfire Insurance Coverage Study Act of 2025, would require the Comptroller General, in consultation with the Director of the Federal Insurance Office and state insurance regulators, to conduct a federally focused study on insurance coverage for damages from wildfires. The study will examine wildfire risk in the United States, the current state of homeowners and commercial property coverage, and how state regulatory actions have affected premiums, non-renewals, and coverage for wildfire damage.
It will also evaluate mitigation measures and the potential need for a national wildfire risk map. Not later than 12 months after enactment, GAO must report its findings to Congress.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Comptroller General shall conduct a broad study of wildfire risk, current coverage, and the regulatory landscape affecting premiums and policyholders. It covers risk assessment, coverage trends, regulatory responses, and underwriting challenges, with attention to data needs and mitigation options.
Who It Affects
Insurers, regulators, homeowners and commercial property owners in wildfire-prone areas, mortgage lenders, and federal policymakers.
Why It Matters
Understanding risk, affordability, and availability of wildfire coverage is essential as climate-driven fires intensify. The study could inform future policy tools, data standards, and regulatory approaches to stabilize markets and improve resilience.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Wildfire Insurance Coverage Study Act of 2025 tasks the GAO with a comprehensive study of wildfire risk and how it translates into insurance coverage. The inquiry will map the extent and nature of wildfire risk, examine current homeowners and commercial coverage, and analyze how private insurers have adjusted pricing, cost-sharing, and renewals over roughly the prior decade.
It will also review state regulatory responses to rising premiums and policy exclusions, including rate setting, moratoria, and residual market mechanisms. In addition, the bill asks the GAO to consider what federal or state programs exist to measure risk and forecast wildfires and whether a national risk map would be useful.
Finally, GAO must deliver a report to Congress within 12 months of enactment detailing findings, trends, and potential policy implications. The intent is to equip lawmakers with data-driven insights rather than prescribe a policy outcome.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill directs GAO to study wildfire risk, existing coverage, and how regulation affects premiums and renewals.
It analyzes trends in rates, policyholder cost-sharing, and non-renewals over the past 10 years.
It examines regulatory actions by states, including mandates, subsidies, and residual market tools.
GAO must report its findings to Congress within 12 months of enactment.
The study considers underwriting challenges and policy options such as data improvements, risk-sharing mechanisms, and mitigation investments.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title and citation
Establishes the act's formal citation as the Wildfire Insurance Coverage Study Act of 2025 for reference in legal and policy discussions.
GAO study scope: wildfire risk and coverage
The Comptroller General, in consultation with the Director of the Federal Insurance Office and state insurance regulators, shall conduct a study to analyze the extent and nature of wildfire risk in the United States, including trends in wildfire declarations, geography, costs, and frequency, mitigation practices, and existing programs that measure risk and forecast wildfire events. The study will also assess whether a national map for measuring wildfire risk is warranted.
GAO study topics: current coverage and regulatory responses
The study will evaluate the existing state of homeowners and commercial wildfire coverage, focusing on rate changes, cost-sharing, and non-renewals over the preceding decade; the events and economic factors driving those changes; whether coverage has been curtailed or excluded; and how state regulatory actions have affected availability, affordability, and insurers’ risk appetite. It also examines regulatory tools such as residual markets, subsidies, and other state interventions.
GAO reporting requirement
Not later than 12 months after enactment, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report identifying the findings and conclusions of the study, including data, methods, and policy implications.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Homeowners in wildfire-prone areas who may gain clearer insight into risk and potential policy options to improve affordability and coverage.
- Commercial property owners in high-wildfire zones who rely on robust coverage to sustain operations and rebuild after fires.
- Private insurers that price, underwrite, and manage wildfire risk and can benefit from data-driven risk assessment and policy design.
- State insurance regulators seeking guidance on regulation and best practices for wildfire-related coverage and market stability.
- Congress and GAO, which gain evidence-based inputs to inform future legislation and oversight.
Who Bears the Cost
- GAO and federal appropriations financing the study.
- Private insurers and other data providers that may incur data-sharing or reporting costs.
- State insurance regulators that must allocate staff time and resources to collect and furnish information.”]},
- theFinePrint.text
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether a federal, data-driven inquiry into wildfire risk and insurance coverage should be a means of stabilizing markets without imposing undue burdens on insurers or reducing coverage availability in high-risk areas.
The bill establishes a research mandate rather than a regulatory requirement. It does not itself change premiums, coverage terms, or state authority.
Instead, it depends on the GAO’s ability to gather data from federal and state sources and the willingness of private insurers to share information. The scope of the study could be affected by data quality, variations in state reporting, and the heterogeneity of insurance markets across states.
The 12-month reporting deadline is tight for a comprehensive, nationwide assessment that must reconcile diverse regulatory frameworks and market conditions; the bill does not specify funding levels or data-access guarantees. These factors could affect the depth and reliability of conclusions and any subsequent policy moves.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.