This bill adds a new section to the Internal Revenue Code that establishes a federal tax credit for certain flood-insurance expenses. The credit is structured in three parts—covering NFIP flood premiums, private flood premiums, and NFIP contents coverage—and is claimed on the taxpayer’s income tax return.
The measure aims to reduce out-of-pocket flood-insurance costs for homeowners who carry flood coverage, while differentiating between federally backed (NFIP) and private-market policies. It alters incentives in the flood-insurance market and creates new compliance work for tax preparers and insurers.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill creates Internal Revenue Code section 25G, which lets taxpayers claim a credit against income tax for certain flood-insurance premium expenses. The credit is composed of three component amounts (for NFIP premiums, private premiums, and NFIP contents coverage) and is calculated on the taxpayer’s return.
Who It Affects
Primary-residence owners who pay for flood coverage, insurers (both the National Flood Insurance Program and private carriers), tax preparers, and the Treasury. Mortgage servicers and escrow agents will also see operational impacts where premiums are escrowed.
Why It Matters
The credit reduces net premium costs, potentially changing buyer behavior between NFIP and private policies and affecting NFIP take-up and premium revenue. It also imposes new calculation and verification tasks for filers and tax professionals.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
Section 25G establishes a tax-credit framework that treats three streams of flood-insurance spending separately. First, it recognizes federal flood insurance premiums (NFIP) as a credit-eligible expense up to a capped amount.
Second, it allows a credit for private flood-insurance premiums equal to half of those premiums, subject to its own cap. Third, it provides a standalone cap for NFIP contents coverage.
The statute defines each category and requires taxpayers to aggregate the applicable amounts when computing the credit.
The bill phases the credit down for higher-income taxpayers using different reduction rates for each component; the phaseout formulas reduce the component amounts based on taxpayer income above specific thresholds and differ by filing status. The statute also restricts the credit to premiums tied to the taxpayer’s principal residence only and bars dual tax benefits where another code section already permits a deduction for the same expense.
Finally, each of the dollar caps is indexed for inflation after the initial year, and the amendments apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.Operationally, the law leaves several practical tasks to taxpayers and their preparers: determining whether a given premium counts as “Federal” or “private,” allocating premiums that include both building and contents coverage, and applying distinct phaseout formulas based on filer type. The statute does not include an express provision converting the credit into a refundable payment, which will matter for lower-income filers with little or no income-tax liability.
The bill also includes a clerical amendment to the subpart table of sections to add section 25G.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The credit is a sum of three component amounts: an amount for NFIP (federal) flood premiums, an amount equal to 50% of private flood premiums, and an amount for NFIP contents coverage.
Each component has its own dollar cap and calculation rule; the private-premium component is explicitly limited to 50% of those premiums before applying its cap.
The statute phases down each component for taxpayers with income above set thresholds, using different reduction percentages by filing status and by component.
The credit applies only to flood coverage for the taxpayer’s principal residence and disallows a credit for amounts already deductible under certain Code sections.
Dollar caps in the statute are indexed for inflation for taxable years after 2026 and the statute takes effect for tax years beginning after December 31, 2025.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Allowance and structure of the credit
This subsection creates the credit and prescribes that it equals the sum of three component amounts: (1) NFIP (federal) flood insurance expenses subject to a cap, (2) 50% of private flood insurance expenses subject to a separate cap, and (3) NFIP contents-coverage expenses subject to a third cap. Practically, prepare to compute three parallel lines on a return and sum them rather than apply one blended percentage or single dollar limit.
Income-based phaseouts for each component
Subsection (b) sets distinct phaseout formulas for each of the three components. Each formula reduces the applicable component by a percentage of ‘income’ above a threshold that varies by filing status; the reduction percentages differ across the NFIP, private, and contents components. Tax preparers must implement three separate phaseout calculations and ensure reductions do not drop any component below zero.
Definitions of the three expense categories
This subsection defines Federal flood insurance expense (NFIP premiums net of contents coverage), private flood insurance expense (premiums for non-NFIP policies, including contents), and Federal contents coverage flood insurance expense. The definitions require allocation where a policy bundles building and contents, and they determine which premium portions map to which credit component.
Primary residence limit and anti-double-dipping rule
Subsection (d) confines eligible premiums to those related to the taxpayer’s principal residence (using the section 121 residency concept). Subsection (e) bars the credit for any amount for which a deduction is allowed under specified Code sections. Together these provisions narrow eligibility and force preparers to reconcile Schedule A or other deductions with the new credit claim.
Inflation adjustment for dollar caps
The statute instructs the Treasury to adjust each numeric dollar amount for cost-of-living changes after 2026, using the Code’s standard cost-of-living formula with 2025 as the base year. Implementers must include logic to round adjusted amounts to the nearest $50 per the statutory rounding rule.
Application date and technical changes
The bill applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, and inserts the section into the subpart A table of sections. That timing creates the first applicable tax year of 2026 for calendar-year filers and means software, forms, and IRS guidance will need updates before filing season 2027 for many filers.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Homeowners in flood-exposed areas who carry NFIP policies — they receive direct tax relief that reduces net NFIP premium cost, which lowers the after-tax price of remaining in NFIP coverage.
- Homeowners who buy private flood insurance — the credit covers half of private-premium outlays (subject to caps), improving affordability for those who use private-market products.
- Households with NFIP contents coverage — a dedicated contents component lowers the marginal cost of insuring personal property inside a principal residence.
- Private insurers — the 50% treatment of private premiums creates a demand-side advantage for private carriers relative to an absence of subsidy, potentially accelerating private-market growth.
Who Bears the Cost
- The federal government/Treasury — the credit reduces federal receipts; the scale depends on uptake, average premiums, and phaseout effectiveness.
- Taxpayers with non-principal residences and owners of second homes — the law excludes those properties, so individuals with vacation or rental properties bear continued full premium costs.
- Tax preparers, software vendors, and lenders — they must implement new calculations, map premiums to statutory categories, and validate claims for clients, adding compliance time and programming expense.
- Middle- and higher-income filers near phaseout thresholds — complexity in phaseout rules can produce cliff effects or partial benefits that complicate planning and may leave some households with modest relief relative to their premium burden.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether to prioritize straightforward, widely available premium relief that reduces the immediate out-of-pocket cost of flood insurance or to design a narrowly targeted program that better prioritizes limited federal dollars; the bill opts for a middle path with multiple component caps and income-based phaseouts, but that choice increases complexity, leaves important questions (refundability, income definition, documentation) unresolved, and shifts some discretionary judgment to implementing agencies.
The statute creates targeted relief but embeds several implementation frictions. First, the bill’s categorization of premiums (NFIP building vs. NFIP contents vs. private) requires allocation rules when policies bundle coverages or when a private insurer writes a policy that mirrors NFIP coverage.
The bill does not establish a documentation standard (for example, a required insurance provider statement), so administration will likely depend on IRS guidance and insurer cooperation. Second, the use of the term “income” in the phaseout formulas is ambiguous: the statute does not specify whether that means gross income, adjusted gross income, or taxable income.
That ambiguity affects both who qualifies for reductions and how large those reductions are.
Third, the bill is silent on refundability. It says the credit is “against the tax imposed by this subtitle,” which is the ordinary phrasing for nonrefundable credits, but it does not explicitly address whether excess credit can produce a refund or be carried forward.
That silence matters for low-income households who carry flood insurance but have little income-tax liability. Finally, the interaction with NFIP pricing and subsidy structures could be material: a federal credit lowers insured households’ effective premium, which can alter demand and financial dynamics in both NFIP and the private market.
The law also creates potential budget and distributional trade-offs between broad subsidies and targeting needier households more effectively.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.