This bill directs federal public buildings to favor classical and traditional architectural styles. It defines key terms, scopes which buildings are affected (including courthouses, agency headquarters, and large-scale projects in the National Capital Region), and establishes a policy framework to elevate design quality.
It also lays out guiding principles for site selection, regional architectural heritage, and the incorporation of public art, all under the sponsorship of the General Services Administration (GSA).
To implement the policy, the act requires updating GSA procedures, ensuring architects have formal training or extensive experience in classical or traditional design, creating a senior architectural design advisor, and prioritizing design-build competitions when awarding major projects. It also requires notification to the President 30 days before approving a design that diverges from the preferred architecture, including justification and a lifecycle cost analysis.
The intent is to balance aesthetic excellence with practicality while embedding heritage-conscious choices in federal infrastructure.
At a Glance
What It Does
The act establishes a formal preference for classical and traditional architecture in applicable Federal public buildings, creates guiding principles for design, and requires GSA to update procedures to reflect these principles. It also mandates design competitions and places specific weight on classical expertise in evaluation.
Who It Affects
GSA’s Public Buildings Service, federal agencies undertaking building projects, architectural firms with classical/traditional design capabilities, and communities hosting federal buildings.
Why It Matters
It sets a national standard for the look and feel of federal spaces, ties procurement to architectural heritage, and influences how public buildings convey dignity and identity. It also introduces new roles and processes that affect procurement timelines and project costs.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill codifies a policy that federal public buildings should predominantly reflect classical and traditional architectural styles. It defines several terms to distinguish between preferred and non-preferred forms of architecture and identifies which buildings are covered by the policy.
It then directs the General Services Administration (GSA) to implement guiding principles that emphasize architectural excellence, regional heritage, and civic identity in design. The act also requires that GSA update its policies to reflect these principles and ensure relevant staff have formal training or significant experience in classical design.
A key feature is the emphasis on design competitions and the integration of input from distinguished classical architecture practitioners. The bill directs GSA to recruit firms with classical/traditional experience and to weigh that experience in evaluating designs.
Finally, the act creates a notification requirement: if a proposed design diverges from the preferred classic/traditional approach, the Administrator must inform the President at least 30 days before any rejection, including a justification, cost estimates, and a comparison to preferred alternatives. These provisions together aim to improve the aesthetic quality and cultural resonance of federal buildings while balancing cost and practicality.Overall, the act positions classical and traditional architecture as the default for applicable federal projects, with mechanisms to ensure community input, professional expertise, and transparent decision-making in design choices.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a formal preference for classical and traditional architecture in applicable Federal public buildings.
It defines key terms such as 2025 dollars, applicable Federal public buildings, and preferred architecture.
GSA must update procedures, train architects, and appoint a senior advisor for architectural design.
Design competitions are required, and classic/traditional experience is weighted in evaluations.
A 30-day President-notification requirement applies if a proposed design diverges from the preferred architecture, with justification and lifecycle cost analysis.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Make Federal Architecture Beautiful Again Act. It establishes the overarching objective of promoting classical and traditional architectural styles for applicable Federal public buildings and sets the stage for the definitions and policies that follow.
Definitions
The bill defines foundational terms to distinguish styles (classical/traditional vs. Brutalist/Deconstructivist), scopes of buildings affected, and terminology used throughout. Notably, it includes 2025 dollars for cost definitions, the Administrative and General Services Administration (Adminstrator) roles, and what constitutes an applicable Federal public building (courthouses, agency HQs, and large- scale projects exceeding a specified cost threshold in 2025 dollars). It also identifies the range of architectural traditions considered classical and traditional, and clarifies who is part of the “general public.”
Policy of the United States
The policy directs applicable Federal public buildings to uplift and beautify spaces, inspire civic pride, and be visually identifiable as government edifices. It mandates that architecture meet criteria of dignity and stability and emphasizes input from local communities in design selection. In the District of Columbia, classical architecture is the preferred and default option absent exceptional factors, and designs diverging from the preferred mode should be handled with care to preserve public confidence and heritage.
Guiding Principles for Federal Architecture
Agencies should pursue architectural excellence by preferring classical/traditional forms while allowing alternative styles in suitable circumstances. The design process should reflect regional architectural heritage, and where feasible, incorporate fine art by living American artists. Buildings must adhere to sound construction practices and be economical to build, operate, and maintain, with accessibility in mind. Design must originate from government needs and public preferences rather than architectural fashion, and the government should be willing to accept some added cost to avoid excessive uniformity. Competitions should be used where appropriate, and the advice of distinguished classical architects should be sought before major design contracts. Site selection is viewed as the first design step and should involve local collaboration and consideration of surrounding streets, public spaces, and landscape opportunities.
GSA Policy Adherence
The Administrator shall adhere to the policy and guiding principles described in sections 3 and 4 and shall expeditiously update GSA policies and procedures to reflect them, ensuring that the agency’s approach to federal architecture aligns with the Act’s objectives.
Requirements for GSA Staff and Procedures
The Administrator must ensure that GSA architects who review or approve design selections have formal training or substantial experience in classical/traditional architecture. The Act also requires creating a senior advisor for architectural design to develop procedures, advise on standards, and guide evaluations or design juries. In design-build projects, the architect’s experience with classical/traditional architecture should be listed as specialized experience and given substantial weight during phase-1 evaluation.
Design Competitions
When a design competition is used to select a building design, the Administrator must actively recruit firms with classical/traditional experience and, to the extent practicable, ensure multiple design modes advance to the final evaluation round so that a range of approaches can be considered.
Notification on Divergence from Preferred Architecture
If a proposed design diverges from the preferred architecture (e.g., Brutalist or Deconstructivist styles), the Administrator must notify the President, through the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, at least 30 days before rejecting such a design due to cost or other factors. The notification must explain why the proposed design is justified, include the total expected lifecycle cost, and compare it with the costs of preferred designs.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- GSA’s Public Buildings Service gains clearer policy direction and new staff roles to execute the design standards.
- Architectural firms with expertise in classical/traditional design gain access to a guaranteed preference in competitions and procurement signals.
- Federal agencies planning and delivering building projects benefit from unified criteria and streamlined evaluation anchored in heritage-conscious design.
- Local communities and regional stakeholders gain influence through site selection and alignment with local architectural traditions.
- Public art initiatives and living American artists can be incorporated into federal building designs under the guiding principles.
Who Bears the Cost
- Higher upfront design costs or lifecycle cost considerations if classical design requires more resources.
- GSA and agency staff incur costs to update policies, train staff, and maintain new roles (e.g., senior architectural design advisor).
- Design competitions and expanded recruitment efforts may extend procurement timelines and administrative overhead.
- Potentially higher construction costs associated with classical/traditional materials or detailing in some projects.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing a formal nationwide preference for classical/traditional architecture against cost efficiency, regional variation, and evolving building needs creates a central dilemma: should aesthetics and heritage take precedence in design decisions, even if it limits flexibility and raises costs, or should procurement remain more flexible to accommodate innovation and budget realities?
The bill creates a strong normative preference for classical and traditional architecture, which may raise costs or extend design phases in some projects. It also introduces new roles and procedures within GSA, requiring training, staff additions, and changes to procurement practices (including design-build evaluation criteria).
While intended to elevate public spaces and reflect national heritage, the act may interact with existing statutory procurement rules and regional architectural diversity, potentially complicating decisions where site constraints or budget realities favor non-traditional forms. Smart implementation will require transparent case-by-case justification when deviations from the preferred architecture occur, including lifecycle cost comparisons and detailed alternatives considered.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.