Codify — Article

Designates Westhampton Beach post office as the “Jolly 51 Memorial Post Office Building”

A single-purpose bill renames the USPS facility at 170 Main Street in Westhampton Beach and directs that federal references to the site use the new name—affecting signage, records, and official citations.

The Brief

This bill directs that the United States Postal Service facility located at 170 Main Street in Westhampton Beach, New York, be known as the “Jolly 51 Memorial Post Office Building.” It contains two short provisions: one that declares the designation and a second that says any legal, regulatory, cartographic, or documentary references to the facility shall be treated as references to the new name.

On its face the bill is strictly nominative: it changes the official name used in federal records and documents. That change has small but real administrative consequences for USPS signage, federal databases, maps, and any statutes or regulations that reference the building by its prior name; the bill’s deeming clause is designed to preserve continuity by avoiding the need to amend other laws or documents manually.

At a Glance

What It Does

The bill declares the USPS facility at 170 Main Street in Westhampton Beach the “Jolly 51 Memorial Post Office Building” and provides that any reference in law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other federal record to that facility shall be deemed to be a reference to the new name.

Who It Affects

Primary actors are the United States Postal Service (for signage and internal records), federal records managers and mapmakers who maintain databases and publications, and local governments and community stakeholders who use the building’s name for civic purposes.

Why It Matters

Commemorative namings are procedural but consequential: they authorize an official federal designation that becomes the standard in statutes, maps, and federal documents, and they create modest administrative tasks (and potential costs) for agencies and local partners charged with implementing the change.

More articles like this one.

A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.

Unsubscribe anytime.

What This Bill Actually Does

The bill is narrowly focused: it creates a federal designation for one specific USPS facility. Paragraph (a) declares that the building at the specified street address in Westhampton Beach shall be known by the memorial name.

That statutory declaration makes the name part of the public record; once enacted, federal agencies and officials should treat the new name as the building’s official designation.

Paragraph (b) covers continuity. It states that any existing or future reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other United States record to the facility shall be read as a reference to the Jolly 51 Memorial Post Office Building.

That deeming language is a standard drafting device: it preserves the force of prior references without requiring line-by-line statutory or regulatory amendments.Practically, implementation will be administrative: USPS and federal recordkeepers will update signage, databases, internal directories, and published maps to reflect the name. The bill does not include operational instructions or appropriations; it simply establishes the name and the legal rule for interpreting references.

The change is limited in scope to this facility and does not by itself alter property interests, postal operations, ZIP codes, or address numeration.

The Five Things You Need to Know

1

The bill designates the USPS facility at 170 Main Street in Westhampton Beach, NY, as the “Jolly 51 Memorial Post Office Building.”, Representative Nick LaLota introduced the bill with Representative Andrew Lawler listed as a co-sponsor on September 26, 2025.

2

Congress referred the bill to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform upon introduction.

3

The statutory text comprises one section with two subsections: (a) the formal designation, and (b) a deeming clause covering references in laws, maps, regulations, documents, papers, or other United States records.

4

The deeming clause is broad in scope: it automatically treats existing and future federal references to the facility as references to the new name, avoiding the need to amend other federal instruments explicitly.

Section-by-Section Breakdown

Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections. Expand all ↓

Section 1(a)

Formal designation of the facility

This subsection delivers the operative command: the specified USPS facility shall be known as the Jolly 51 Memorial Post Office Building. Practically, that declaration brings the name into the United States Code and the federal record, making it the authoritative federal label for the site.

Section 1(b)

Deeming of references in federal records

This clause instructs that any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other U.S. record to the facility is to be treated as a reference to the new name. The provision preserves legal continuity by ensuring existing citations, regulatory cross-references, and cartographic labels remain valid without textual amendment.

Implementation and scope

Administrative effects and limits

Though the bill changes the official name, it does not set out funding, timelines, or implementation procedures. The practical tasks—updating USPS signage, database entries, federal maps, and internal records—fall to responsible agencies under their existing authorities. The statute’s effect is nominal and records-based: it does not, on its face, change operational functions, ownership, addresses, ZIP codes, or other non-nominal attributes of the property.

At scale

This bill is one of many.

Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.

Explore Government in Codify Search →

Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost

Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.

Who Benefits

  • Local community and civic groups: the designation provides an official, enduring federal recognition that can support local heritage, memorialization, and civic identity.
  • Family, friends, or constituents associated with the name ‘Jolly 51’: the bill creates a federal memorial in a public, high-visibility location.
  • Municipal planners and local tourism interests: an official federal name can be used in marketing, wayfinding, and local materials without needing to reference an informal or colloquial name.

Who Bears the Cost

  • United States Postal Service: updating signage, letterhead, web pages, and internal systems to reflect the new name entails administrative work and modest expenses, borne within USPS budgets or through local arrangements.
  • Federal records managers and GIS/map publishers: databases, maps, and regulatory documents that reference the facility will require updates to reflect the designation, creating workload for agency records teams.
  • Local businesses and service providers: firms that publish directories, legal instruments, or marketing materials (for example, property managers or contractors) may need to revise references to the post office to align with the official name, creating small compliance and updating costs.

Key Issues

The Core Tension

The central tension is symbolic recognition versus administrative friction: the bill delivers a permanent federal honor in the form of an official name, meeting commemorative aims, but it imposes modest, dispersed administrative work and potential costs without specifying who bears them—forcing agencies and local partners to reconcile civic recognition with practical implementation burdens.

The bill’s language is brief and deliberately narrow, which simplifies passage but leaves practical questions open. It contains no appropriation or implementation schedule, so agencies decide how and when to update signage, databases, and publications within existing budgets and processes.

That gap creates uncertainty about who pays for physical signage changes or whether local governments will shoulder some upfront costs.

The deeming clause avoids disrupting statutes and regulations that mention the facility by an earlier name, but it does not resolve secondary effects. For example, the bill does not address whether postal markings, automated address validation systems, or privately maintained commercial databases must display both names or how legacy references in contracts should be interpreted.

Those downstream issues will be handled by agencies, courts, or market actors as they arise, which could create short-term friction or inconsistent uses of the new name across systems.

Try it yourself.

Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.