The bill amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the sewer overflow and stormwater reuse municipal grants program by replacing the current paragraph (1) in Section 221(f) with a new annual authorization. The new text specifies that $350,000,000 is to be appropriated for each fiscal year 2026 through 2031 to carry out this section.
This creates a six-year funding horizon for municipalities to advance projects that reduce sewer overflows and expand stormwater reuse, while leaving the broader program framework intact and subject to the usual budget process for actual appropriations.
At a Glance
What It Does
Amends Section 221(f) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act by striking paragraph (1) and inserting a new general authorization. It authorizes $350,000,000 to be appropriated for each fiscal year 2026 through 2031 to carry out the sewer overflow and stormwater reuse grants program.
Who It Affects
Municipalities and water utilities applying for and administering sewer overflow and stormwater grants, along with state environmental agencies overseeing the program and local infrastructure programs.
Why It Matters
Provides a stable, six-year funding horizon for critical water infrastructure projects, enabling planning and execution of CSO mitigation and stormwater reuse initiatives within a defined federal funding envelope.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill operates within the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, focusing on the sewer overflow and stormwater reuse municipal grants program. It changes Section 221(f) by removing the old paragraph (1) and replacing it with language that authorizes the federal government to appropriate $350 million for each fiscal year from 2026 through 2031 to carry out this section.
In practical terms, this sets a six-year funding ceiling tied specifically to this grant program, providing municipalities with a predictable funding runway for CSO mitigation and stormwater reuse projects. The amendment does not alter the grant program’s eligibility rules, administration, or overall structure; it simply fixes the annual funding level and the six-year window during which those funds are available.
As with all federal funding, actual distribution will depend on the annual budget process and appropriation acts, but this text removes ambiguity about the level and duration of the authorization. Outside of the funding authorization, the bill leaves the program's core policy framework intact, so eligible projects and recipients remain governed by the existing statutory criteria and grant mechanisms.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill authorizes $350,000,000 to be appropriated for each fiscal year 2026 through 2031 to carry out Section 221 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
It replaces paragraph (1) in subsection (f) of Section 221 with a new general authorization amount.
The funded program is the Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Reuse Municipal Grants under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
The authorization creates a six-year funding window (FY 2026–FY 2031).
This is a funding reauthorization, not a substantive redesign of grant eligibility or program administration.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Authorization and funding for sewer overflow and stormwater grants
Section 2 amends Section 221(f) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act by striking paragraph (1) and inserting a new general authorization. The net effect is a fixed annual appropriation of $350,000,000 to be available for each fiscal year from 2026 through 2031 to carry out this section. This clarifies the funding horizon for the municipal grants program and anchors it to a six-year period, while preserving the broader framework of the program under the existing statute. The change is strictly financial in nature and does not alter the program’s governance, eligibility, or project selection mechanisms.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Cities and towns pursuing CSO mitigation and stormwater reuse projects that rely on federal grants to finance capital improvements.
- Public utilities and wastewater treatment systems that partner with municipalities on grant-supported infrastructure upgrades.
- State environmental agencies administering the grant program, which gain a stable funding stream to support local projects.
- Residents in areas affected by sewer overflows who benefit from reduced discharges and improved wastewater management.
- Engineering, construction, and consulting firms engaged in grant-funded infrastructure projects.
Who Bears the Cost
- The federal Treasury, through annual appropriations, bears the cost of funding the program (subject to annual budget decisions).
- State and local governments bear administrative costs associated with applying for, managing, and reporting on grant-funded projects.
- Taxpayers bear the downstream implications of federal budget decisions and any shifts in funding priorities over the six-year window.
- Contractors and vendors delivering grant-supported projects may incur costs tied to bid- and compliance-related requirements.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether a fixed, six-year funding horizon provides adequate stability for long-lived infrastructure projects while preserving congressional flexibility to reallocate funds as priorities shift.
Because the bill only authorizes funding for a fixed six-year period and does not prescribe annual appropriations beyond that window, actual funding remains subject to future budget decisions. The amendment does not change the program’s eligibility criteria or administrative structure; it simply fixes the level of annual funding and the six-year window during which those funds are available.
Potential implementation challenges include ensuring timely yearly appropriations, avoiding gaps in funding between years, and coordinating with related federal programs to maximize impact on sewer overflow mitigation and stormwater reuse.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.