HB5735 would direct the Secretary of the Army to establish a six-year program to test and implement stabilization and erosion-control technology to prevent coastal erosion. The program runs subject to appropriations and involves coordination with federal agencies and state coastal programs under the Coastal Zone Management Act.
The bill prioritizes biomimetic approaches to protect estuaries, cliffs, beaches, dunes, and shorelines, and seeks alternatives to hardened structures that can disrupt habitats or displace erosion elsewhere. Definitions clarify biomimetic methods as engineered, temporary, adjustable, removable, and reusable, and designate the Secretary as the Army’s Chief researcher for the program.
At a Glance
What It Does
For six years, subject to funding, the Secretary of the Army must establish a program to research and develop stabilization and erosion-control technology, including biomimetic methods and alternatives to hardened structures, with monitoring and maintenance built into the plan.
Who It Affects
The program targets federal–state coordination with CZMA programs, researchers, coastal management entities, and shoreline communities; it implicates the Army and related federal and state agencies in testing, deployment, and oversight.
Why It Matters
It signals a shift toward nature-inspired and flexible stabilization approaches, expands geographic testing, and creates a formal reporting mechanism to assess viability and continuation.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Coastal Infrastructure Improvement Act tasks the Army with creating a six-year research and development program to test technologies that stabilize coastlines and control erosion. The emphasis is on biomimetic methods that mimic natural processes and on options that avoid hard, habitat-disruptive structures.
The program is funded only to the extent funds are appropriated and will involve collaboration with other federal agencies and state coastal programs under the Coastal Zone Management Act. The Secretariat also requires monitoring and maintenance as part of coastal stabilization efforts and directs the Secretary to define what biomimetic means in this context.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a six-year, appropriations-dependent program under the Army to test stabilization and erosion-control technology.
Biomimetic methods and alternatives to hardened structures are explicitly prioritized.
Research must occur in diverse geographic locations and align with state CZMA programs.
A comprehensive program evaluation and continuation recommendation must be reported within 60 days after the period ends.
Definitions clarify what constitutes a biomimetic method and identify the Secretary as the Army official responsible for the program.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Program Establishment and Scope
Subject to appropriations, for six years the Secretary of the Army must establish a program to carry out research and development on stabilization and erosion-control technology. The program must consider the estimated cost and longevity of the technology and include biomimetic methods for protecting coastal features, as well as monitoring and maintenance requirements. The bill also calls for exploring alternatives to hardened structures that are static and habitat-disruptive and may contribute to erosion in neighboring areas. The Secretary is to coordinate with other federal agencies and states managing CZMA programs when appropriate.
Diversity of Testing Locations
The Secretary must ensure that research and development activities are carried out in diverse geographic locations. This requirement aims to capture a range of coastal environments and erosion dynamics to improve the generalizability of findings and to avoid location-specific bias.
Reporting Requirement
Not later than 60 days after the end of the six-year period, the Secretary must submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House a report detailing the program’s operations, a comprehensive evaluation, and recommendations for continuing or modifying the program.
Definitions
Biomimetic method means an engineered system that mimics natural processes, is temporary, adjustable, removable, and reusable, and can be combined with natural elements to enhance ecosystem function while providing protection. The term Secretary refers to the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Director of the Engineer Research and Development Center.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Infrastructure across all five countries.
Explore Infrastructure in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Coastal municipalities and counties at risk of shoreline loss, which could gain from tested stabilization solutions and protected infrastructure.
- State coastal management programs that coordinate CZMA activities and may incorporate successful technologies into their plans.
- Army Corps of Engineers, the Army, and the Engineer Research and Development Center, which gain funding for R&D and management authority for pilots.
- Coastal researchers, universities, and private sector partners involved in testing and developing new stabilization technologies.
- Environmental and habitat-focused organizations that prefer alternatives to hard structures that disrupt habitats.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal government bears upfront research, development, and administration costs funded through appropriations.
- State and local agencies may incur coordination and monitoring costs as projects scale.
- Coastal communities implementing pilot projects may bear local costs related to site preparation, maintenance, or monitoring.
- Private firms participating in pilots may incur testing costs and compatibility expenses with existing infrastructure.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing the pursuit of innovative, habitat-conscious stabilization methods with the realities of limited, uncertain funding and the need for timely coastal protection across diverse geographies.
The bill creates an ambitious R&D agenda funded only to the extent that appropriations allow. It relies on biomimetic and other non-traditional stabilization approaches, which may require long lead times to prove performance across different coastlines.
While the act emphasizes monitoring and maintenance, it does not specify funding streams beyond general appropriations, potentially slowing deployment. Coordination with multiple federal and state entities under the CZMA framework will be essential to ensure that tested technologies align with existing coastal management objectives and regulatory approvals.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.