The bill directs the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to continue obligating and disbursing funds in the Disaster Relief Fund for covered programs during a lapse in appropriations. It designates employees necessary to carry out these disbursements as excepted from furlough or reduction in force under the Anti-Deficiency Act.
It also defines what counts as “covered funds” and “covered programs” under the Stafford Act, so that ongoing relief, emergency assistance, and recovery activities can proceed without awaiting new appropriations. The aim is to preserve life-and-property protection and disaster-response capacity when normal funding is temporarily unavailable, using funds already appropriated and available before the lapse.
At a Glance
What It Does
During a lapse in appropriations, FEMA must continue obligating and disbursing funds that are already appropriated and available in the Disaster Relief Fund for covered programs. The act also clarifies that personnel needed to carry out these disbursements are treated as excepted from furlough or reduction in force.
Who It Affects
FEMA’s disaster-relief operations, staff supporting disbursement activities, and recipients of disaster assistance under the Stafford Act (including individuals, state and local partners, and emergency-management contractors).
Why It Matters
It ensures continuity of life- and property-protection activities when Congress has not yet funded the government, reducing disruption to relief efforts and avoiding gaps in disaster response and recovery.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Federal Emergency Management Continuity Act of 2025 requires FEMA to keep the money moving from the Disaster Relief Fund even if a funding lapse occurs. This means that funds already legislatively authorized and available before the lapse can still be obligated and disbursed to support disaster relief, emergency assistance, and recovery programs identified under the Stafford Act.
To make this possible, the bill treats personnel necessary to execute these disbursements as excepted from standard federal pay rules during a lapse, preventing furloughs or forced reductions that would otherwise halt relief work. It also clearly defines what counts as covered funds and covered programs so there’s no ambiguity about which authorities apply when appropriations are temporarily unavailable.
The measure is designed to sustain essential operations, protect life and property, and maintain continuity of relief efforts during funding gaps, using money that has already been appropriated and remains available for use.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill requires FEMA to continue obligating and disbursing Disaster Relief Fund funds during a lapse in appropriations for covered programs.
Covered funds are those appropriated before the lapse that remain available to be expended.
Covered programs include disaster relief, emergency assistance, and recovery activities under the Stafford Act, including individual and public assistance.
Employees necessary to carry out disbursements are treated as excepted under the Anti-Deficiency Act and cannot be furloughed or reduced due to the lapse.
The act defines terms to prevent ambiguity about which funds and programs apply during a lapse and to ensure government continuity.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This section establishes the act’s official title, the Federal Emergency Management Continuity Act of 2025, signaling its purpose to sustain FEMA operations during lapses in appropriations.
Continuity of Operations of FEMA
This section requires the FEMA Administrator to keep obligating and disbursing available Disaster Relief Fund dollars for covered programs during a lapse in appropriations, ensuring critical relief activities continue despite funding gaps.
Continuity Obligations During Lapse
Specifically directs that obligations and disbursements proceed for covered programs, drawing on pre-existing, available DRF funds to support life-safety and property protection activities even when normal funding channels are temporarily closed.
Employee Excepted Status
Employees essential to executing the disbursements and related program activities are treated as excepted under the Anti-Deficiency Act and may not be furloughed or reduced in force due to the lapse, preserving operational capacity.
Definitions—Covered Funds and Programs
Defines ‘covered funds’ as DRF dollars that have been appropriated and remain available to be expended, and ‘covered programs’ to include Stafford Act authorities like individual and public assistance and other disaster-relief activities funded through the DRF.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- FEMA disaster-relief program administrators, who gain clarity and continuity to execute ongoing relief operations.
- Disaster-affected individuals and households seeking timely assistance, who benefit from maintained disbursement capacity.
- State and local emergency management agencies that rely on DRF disbursements to fund relief and recovery efforts.
- Emergency management contractors and service providers supported by DRF-funded activities.
- Federal employees whose duties include processing disbursements can operate without disruption.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies must sustain payroll and operational costs to maintain continuity, including staff and IT resources.
- Potential opportunity costs if the DRF disbursements compete with other programs for limited federal funds during a lapse.
- Oversight and compliance bodies may face increased administrative demands to monitor continued expenditures under continuity rules.
- Taxpayers may indirectly bear costs related to sustaining government operations during a lapse, though funds used are pre-existing and available.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is whether preserving essential disaster-relief operations during a lapse in appropriations justifies suspending or bypassing standard budget controls, potentially weakening fiscal discipline while safeguarding life-and-property protection.
The bill enables essential disaster-relief operations to continue during a funding gap by relying on pre-appropriated DRF funds and designating key personnel as excepted. This raises policy tensions around fiscal governance, accountability, and the risk that spending could occur outside the normal appropriation process if lapses persist or funds are misapplied.
While the act provides a clear mechanism to protect life and property, questions remain about how oversight will be maintained, how long such continuity should be permitted, and how to ensure that continuing obligations do not crowd out future appropriations or create unintended incentives to avoid timely budgeting. The measure also presumes the continued availability of DRF funds during lapses and does not address potential statutory or regulatory hurdles that could arise if a lapse extends beyond the funds’ terms or if other federal programs are affected.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.