The SAFE TRACKS Act would amend 49 U.S.C. 20167 to require continued periodic reports on highway-rail grade crossing safety. It adds a new reporting element asking states to explain how they will work with railroads operating in and across the state to reduce pedestrian fatalities, including suicides, along the railroad right of way, in consultation with mental health and law enforcement agencies.
In addition, the bill changes the reporting cadence by requiring the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration to receive reports every five years thereafter, creating a standing federal oversight mechanism for crossing safety and risk-reduction efforts.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill amends Section 20167(a) to add a new paragraph (5) requiring states to describe how they will work with railroads and other stakeholders to reduce pedestrian fatalities along railroad rights-of-way, including suicides, with input from mental health and law enforcement. It also amends Section 20167(b) to require reports to be submitted every five years thereafter to the FRA Administrator.
Who It Affects
States with highway-rail crossings, railroad operators, local and state law enforcement, state mental health agencies, and the Federal Railroad Administration.
Why It Matters
It formalizes ongoing, multi-stakeholder risk-reduction planning for crossing safety and embeds suicide-prevention considerations into crossing safety strategy, creating a durable oversight cadence.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill makes a targeted addition to the interstate highway-rail crossing safety reporting regime. Specifically, it requires states to include in their reports a plan for collaborating with railroads operating within the state and other stakeholders to reduce pedestrian fatalities, including suicides, along railroad rights-of-way.
This collaboration must involve mental health and law enforcement agencies, reflecting a broader safety approach that blends transportation risk reduction with crisis response and prevention. The wording also reconfigures the subsection numbering to insert this new content, and it confirms that the Federal Railroad Administration will receive these reports on a five-year cycle.
The result is a more structured, long-run framework for monitoring crossing safety and coordinating across agencies, railroads, and communities. The text does not allocate funding, but it creates a formal federal oversight mechanism to track progress over time.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Adds new paragraph (5) to Section 20167(a) requiring state plans to coordinate with railroads and stakeholders to reduce pedestrian fatalities at crossings.
Requires states to address suicides as part of crossing safety planning, in consultation with mental health and law enforcement agencies.
Introduces a five-year reporting cadence, with reports due at five-year intervals to the FRA Administrator.
Reindexes the existing paragraphs so the new content sits after paragraph (4) and moves the former paragraph (5) to (6).
Covers coordination with railroads operating in-state and across state lines as part of the safety strategy.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Expanded reporting content: state collaboration plan
The bill adds a new paragraph (5) to Section 20167(a) requiring each state to describe how it will work with railroads operating in and across the state to reduce pedestrian fatalities along the railroad right of way. The plan must be developed in consultation with mental health and law enforcement agencies, ensuring that safety planning integrates crisis response and prevention. The change also reorganizes the subsection so that the new paragraph sits after the current paragraph (4), with the former paragraph (5) becoming paragraph (6). The practical effect is a formal, cross‑agency, cross‑stakeholder approach to safety at crossings.
Insertion and renumbering of paragraphs
The bill restructures Section 20167(a) by inserting a new paragraph (5) after paragraph (4) and renumbering the existing paragraph (5) to (6). This is a structural change to accommodate the expanded reporting content and to maintain a clear, traceable reporting framework for crossing safety that includes stakeholder collaboration and suicide-prevention considerations.
Five-year reporting cadence
In subsection (b), the bill inserts the phrase that the reporting requirement applies “every five years thereafter” before the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration. Practically, this creates a standing, long-run cycle for safety reporting, ensuring ongoing federal oversight and periodic reassessment of state actions and cross-stakeholder collaboration.
Overall impact on reporting process
Together, these changes make the reporting regime more forward-looking and collaborative. States must articulate concrete coordination mechanisms with railroads and public safety bodies, including mental health entities, and the FRA will receive updated cross‑agency safety data on a fixed five-year cycle. The changes emphasize risk-informed planning at crossings but do not attach new funding or enforcement mechanisms to the reporting requirement.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Transportation across all five countries.
Explore Transportation in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State transportation departments gain a clearer mandate and a formal process to coordinate with railroads and safety partners on crossing improvements.
- Railroad operators with interstate and intrastate crossing networks benefit from defined collaboration, which can streamline safety planning and data sharing.
- Local and state law enforcement agencies participate in suicide- and crisis-response planning, improving interagency coordination at crossings.
- State mental health agencies gain a structured channel to contribute to safety planning and crisis-prevention strategies.
- Federal Railroad Administration staff gain a predictable reporting cadence to monitor progress across states.
Who Bears the Cost
- State transportation departments must allocate staff and data resources to prepare expanded reports.
- Railroad operators must participate in multi-stakeholder planning and data sharing, potentially increasing coordination overhead.
- Local law enforcement and mental health agencies will need to allocate time and personnel to participate in cross-agency safety planning.
- FRA will assume greater oversight responsibilities and review workload to process five-year reports.
- Local governments near crossings may need to implement recommendations arising from state reports, potentially incurring implementation costs.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between creating a comprehensive, collaborative safety plan that meaningfully reduces pedestrian fatalities (including suicides) at crossings and the potential administrative and interagency burden on states, railroads, and safety agencies without dedicated funding. Achieving meaningful impact requires sustained cooperation across multiple actors with divergent priorities and data-sharing capabilities.
The bill expands the state reporting obligation to include detailed collaboration plans with railroads and safety stakeholders, including mental health and law enforcement. The five-year cadence embeds a long-run oversight mechanism; however, the text provides no funding or enforcement levers, so states must absorb the added administrative burden within existing budgets.
This could influence the quality and depth of reporting, depending on state capacity and interagency coordination. Privacy considerations around mental health information are not addressed in the bill, leaving questions about the handling of sensitive data within the reports.
The interplay between safety goals, resource constraints, and cross-agency coordination will determine the effectiveness of the new framework.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.