HB 5811 proposes a fundamental shift in U.S. patent policy by returning to a first-to-invent regime and reinstating a one-year grace period before filing. It also repeals inter partes and post-grant review, abolishes the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and replaces the adjudicatory framework with a Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences and a judicial pathway for challenges to patent validity.
The bill creates a dedicated funding mechanism for the USPTO through a new Innovation Promotion Fund, funded by patent and trademark fees, and ends fee diversion. Beyond process, it broadens patent eligibility for scientific discoveries and software, tightens the treatment of prior art, ends automatic publication of patent applications, and strengthens patent rights and remedies, including a presumption of validity and other enforcement tools.
At a Glance
What It Does
It repeals the AIA’s first-to-file system, restores first-to-invent, and adds a one-year grace period before filing. It abolishes inter partes and post-grant reviews and dissolves the PTAB; creates a Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences; funds the USPTO through a dedicated Innovation Promotion Fund.
Who It Affects
Inventors and applicants, universities, research institutions, startups, patent owners, and patent professionals; the USPTO and the broader legal ecosystem handling patent litigation and issuance.
Why It Matters
It signals a return to a different conception of patent rights, prioritizing private property protections and disclosure timing. The changes affect how patents are challenged, litigated, and funded, with wide implications for innovation economics and international posture.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill pivots away from the current regime created by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act and moves toward a system that prioritizes traditional notions of private property in inventions. It repeals the first-to-file framework and restores first-to-invent, including a one-year grace period that allows inventors to disclose their work before seeking protection.
It also removes inter partes and post-grant review, ending the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and replaces those trusts with a Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences and a path for patent validity disputes to be resolved through established legal channels. The funding structure for the USPTO is overhauled to a revolving fund—the Innovation Promotion Fund—supported by patent and trademark fees, with the explicit aim of full funding and eliminating fee diversion.
The bill also broadens what can be patented by amending Section 101 to recognize scientific discoveries and software inventions as patentable, while reworking the limits on prior art under Section 102. In addition, automatic publication of patent applications would end unless a patent is issued, and the bill tightens the litigation framework by preserving a strong presumption of validity, tolling patent term during validity challenges, and reshaping injunctive relief and best mode requirements.
Taken together, these provisions aim to rebalance incentives for invention, disclosure, and enforcement, while returning to a regime that emphasizes private property rights in patents.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill restores first-to-invent and adds a one-year grace period before filing.
Inter partes and post-grant review are repealed; the PTAB is dissolved and replaced by a Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
A dedicated USPTO funding mechanism—Innovation Promotion Fund—finances operations with no fee diversion.
Section 101 is amended to broaden patent eligibility for scientific discoveries and software inventions.
Automatic publication of patent applications ends; a strengthened presumption of validity and related remedies accompany the reforms.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Findings about the patent system
This section articulates the rationale for the bill, arguing that the current patent framework—built on post-AIA principles—has eroded innovation progress. It frames intellectual property as a core government interest and asserts a constitutional justification for returning to stronger inventor rights and private property protections.
Restoring the right of the first inventor to secure a patent
This provision repeals the first-to-file regime introduced by the AIA and returns the system to first-to-invent, including a one-year grace period before filing. The mechanism reestablishes traditional causation of invention and invites disclosure to attract investment and improve the quality of applications.
Abolishing inter partes and post-grant review
Section 4 repeals inter partes and post-grant review and states that such proceedings shall not govern patent validity challenges. It relies instead on judicial channels for determining patent rights, aligning with a policy preference for ex parte adjudication of patent conflicts.
Abolishing the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
The PTAB is repealed and the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences is established to hear appeals from examiners and to decide interferences. The section also redefines the appellate pathway to the courts, preserving mechanisms for challenging patent validity through established legal routes.
Elimination of fee diversion and full funding of the USPTO
This section restructures USPTO funding by creating the Innovation Promotion Fund, converting fee collection into a revolving resource, and ensuring funds are used for patent and trademark administration. It also relocates or renames traditional funds to reflect ongoing operational needs and imposes a broader use of collected fees to support Office activities.
Patentability of scientific discoveries and software inventions
Section 101 is amended to define and broaden what counts as patentable subject matter, with an explicit statement that eligibility is determined without applying the typical 102/103/112 analysis in the initial screening. It also includes a sense-of-Congress statement about the need to protect life sciences and software innovations.
Limitations on prior art
Section 102 is revised to adjust conditions for novelty and prior art, including adjustments to disclosures, public use, and international considerations. The changes set tighter or looser thresholds for what counts as prior art, affecting when a patent can be deemed novel.
Restoring patents as private property and related reforms
This combined section encompasses the establishment of private property patent rights, transferability of patent interests, the removal of best-mode requirements, and related provisions, including publication and remedies. It also touches on the sense of Congress and wider policy implications for ownership and enforcement of patent rights, integrating several prior reforms into a unified property-rights framework.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Technology across all five countries.
Explore Technology in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Independent inventors and inventors who rely on the grace period gain time to refine and disclose inventions before filing.
- Universities and technology transfer offices benefit from a stable framework for patenting university innovations.
- Small businesses and early-stage startups gain a clearer, potentially more protective framework for securing and monetizing IP.
- Patent owners and large tech firms may experience stronger property-right protections that support exclusivity and investments in R&D.
- The USPTO gains predictable, dedicated funding through a new Innovation Promotion Fund, improving operations and strategic planning.
Who Bears the Cost
- Representatives of challengers in patents (e.g., potential licensees and competitors) face fewer avenues to leverage post-grant review to invalidate weak patents.
- Small players with limited budgets may incur higher litigation costs due to reduced post-grant scrutiny and faster patent enforcement cycles.
- The judiciary and patent courts may see increased caseloads as validity disputes move toward direct judicial adjudication and away from PTAB processes.
- Foreign competitors relying on inter partes review and post-grant challenges may be affected by the shift in U.S. patent enforcement mechanisms.
- Some stakeholders may experience higher transaction costs related to patent licensing, valuation, and transfer under a broader and potentially more onerous regime.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The core tension is between restoring strong, private-property-based patent rights and maintaining a patent system that remains efficient, predictable, and capable of curbing frivolous or overly broad patents through timely, expert review.
The bill presents genuine policy tensions between protecting exclusive inventor rights and maintaining a robust, predictable system for challenging bad patents. Restoring first-to-invent aims to incentivize disclosure, but it also increases uncertainty for entities expecting the streamlined certainty of a first-to-file regime.
Abolishing inter partes and post-grant reviews and dissolving the PTAB eliminates a crucial check on weak patents, potentially increasing litigation exposure for others and shifting risk toward judicial fora. The funding shift to a dedicated USPTO fund removes fee diversion but concentrates funds in a new mechanism that could affect the Office’s budgeting and independence.
Amending Section 101 to broaden patentability, while promoting innovation in life sciences and software, raises questions about the balance between rapid protection and the risk of overbroad patent claims. Ending automatic publication reduces the early disclosure of inventions, which could alter the dynamics of investment and competitive strategy.
Overall, the bill seeks to realign patent rights with a constitutional emphasis on private property while rethinking the efficiency, fairness, and global competitiveness of the patent system.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.