This bill authorizes a targeted appropriation to ensure the United States Capitol Police continue to receive pay and remain operational during any lapse in fiscal year 2026 appropriations. It directs the Treasury to make available the sums needed while a funding gap lasts and establishes termination rules tied to later appropriations or September 30, 2026.
The provision matters because it preserves security and operational continuity on the Capitol complex during shutdowns, shifts the immediate fiscal burden onto the Treasury with a requirement to charge back later, and creates an implementation task for Capitol Police and appropriations offices to identify covered personnel and contractors.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill permits the Treasury to provide whatever sums are necessary during periods when FY2026 interim or full-year appropriations are not in effect to keep Capitol Police operations running. It covers pay for excepted and emergency employees, certain civilian staff who support them, and contractors whom the Chief of the Capitol Police determines are providing support.
Who It Affects
Directly affects members of the United States Capitol Police, civilian employees providing operational support, and outside contractors supporting police operations; indirectly affects Congressional legislative-branch budget managers and Treasury/appropriations staff who will account for and later charge those expenditures. The Chief of the Capitol Police is given the primary on-the-ground authority to identify eligible individuals and contractors.
Why It Matters
It removes the immediate risk that security personnel will go unpaid during a funding lapse, but also creates administrative and budgetary consequences: funds are fronted now and charged to future appropriations, and implementation depends heavily on the Chief’s determinations, recordkeeping, and coordination with appropriations offices.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill establishes a narrowly focused, temporary funding authority for the United States Capitol Police for fiscal year 2026 that becomes effective retroactively to October 1, 2025. When no interim or full-year appropriations for FY2026 are in force, Treasury may provide the sums necessary to continue pay and related support so that law-enforcement functions and related support work can continue uninterrupted.
The statute ties eligibility to personnel the Chief of the Capitol Police designates as excepted or performing emergency work and to civilians and contractors the Chief determines are supporting that excepted work.
Practically, the Chief is the gatekeeper: the bill relies on the Office of Personnel Management definitions for 'excepted' and 'emergency' and makes the Chief responsible for determining which civilian employees and contractors qualify. Covered payments include regular pay and allowances and extend to contractor invoices for support services where the Chief makes the requisite determination.
The bill bars the Capitol Police from obligating these interim funds if continuing appropriations for the same purposes are already in effect.Expenditures made under this authority are treated as advances charged to the applicable appropriation, fund, or authorization once Congress later enacts the law containing that appropriation. The Act terminates on the earliest of three events: enactment of appropriations for the Capitol Police through September 30, 2026 that cover these purposes; enactment of legislative-branch appropriations through that date that do not include the appropriation for those purposes; or September 30, 2026 itself.
A special rule requires that pay and allowances covering the period from October 1, 2025 through the day before enactment be paid 'as soon as practicable' after the bill is enacted, creating an explicit retroactive back-pay obligation.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The Chief of the Capitol Police has sole statutory authority to determine which officers, civilian staff, and contractors qualify for payments under this temporary appropriation.
Covered payments explicitly include salaries and allowances and extend to overtime, hazardous‑duty pay, and government contributions for health, retirement, and social security (the bill lists several benefit categories).
The bill authorizes contractor payments only for contractors the Chief determines are providing support to excepted members of the Capitol Police — it does not automatically cover all vendor contracts.
Appropriations provided under the bill may not be obligated if continuing appropriations for the same purposes are already in effect for the Capitol Police, preventing duplicate funding during overlapping authorities.
The Act takes effect retroactively to October 1, 2025 and requires that pay covering the period before enactment be provided 'as soon as practicable' after enactment; expenditures are charged to the applicable future appropriation when that appropriation is later enacted.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Designates the statute as the 'Pay Our Capitol Police Act.' This is a naming provision with no operational effect but signals the bill's narrow purpose to fund Capitol Police during FY2026 funding gaps.
Temporary continuing appropriations for Capitol Police
Grants authority for Treasury to make available, out of the general Treasury, whatever sums are necessary during periods without FY2026 appropriations to cover pay and related benefits. The provision ties eligibility to employees the Chief identifies as excepted or performing emergency work (using OPM definitions) and to civilians and contractors the Chief determines are supporting those employees. For implementers, this creates a workflow: the Chief must identify qualifying people and contractors; payroll and contract offices must process payments under this special authority.
Limitations and charge-back rule
Subsection (b) prevents obligating the temporary funds when continuing appropriations for the same purposes are already in effect for the Capitol Police — a guardrail against double-funding. Subsection (c) requires that expenditures made under the authority be charged to the applicable appropriation, fund, or authorization once Congress enacts the later law containing that appropriation. That means Treasury front‑funds operations during the gap, but accounting and final funding responsibility rest with the later enacting appropriation.
Termination conditions
Sets three, alternative triggers for ending the temporary authority: (1) enactment of appropriations for the Capitol Police through September 30, 2026 that cover the same purposes; (2) enactment of legislative-branch appropriations through that date that do not include an appropriation for those purposes; or (3) the statutory calendar end date of September 30, 2026. For budget officers, this requires monitoring both Capitol Police-specific and broader legislative-branch appropriations to know when the special authority expires.
Effective date and retroactive back pay
Makes the Act effective as if enacted on October 1, 2025 and directs that pay and allowances for any portion of the period between October 1, 2025 and the enactment date be provided 'as soon as practicable' after enactment. This creates an explicit retroactivity requirement for payroll offices and obligates prompt administrative action to liquidate unpaid wages and allowances once the statute is in force.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Members of the United States Capitol Police — receive continuity of pay and allowances during FY2026 funding gaps, reducing disruption to operational readiness and personal financial hardship.
- Civilian staff designated by the Chief as providing essential support — the bill authorizes pay for these employees while they perform work tied to excepted police functions.
- Contractors who directly support excepted police functions — eligible for payment only if the Chief certifies they are providing supporting services, which preserves contractor cash flow where eligible.
- Congressional operations and the public relying on Capitol security — benefit from uninterrupted law-enforcement presence and services during a funding lapse, which helps keep the Capitol complex functioning.
Who Bears the Cost
- The federal Treasury and, ultimately, future appropriations — Treasury fronts payments immediately but the expenditures are charged against later appropriations, shifting near-term cash flow costs to the federal government and future budget lines.
- Capitol Police leadership and administrative staff — must identify eligible individuals and contractors, track interim expenditures, and coordinate charge-back accounting with appropriations offices, increasing administrative burden during a crisis period.
- Congressional appropriations managers — will need to reconcile and absorb these charges into the later enacted appropriations, complicating year-end accounting and possibly displacing other spending priorities.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between operational continuity—ensuring Capitol Police and essential supporting personnel are paid during a shutdown—and fiscal and accountability principles that require appropriations to be enacted before spending; the bill solves the first by fronting funds and assigning broad discretionary authority to the Chief, but that solution risks weakening budgetary transparency and invites implementation disputes over who qualifies for coverage.
The bill resolves a discrete operational problem—keeping Capitol Police paid during a funding lapse—but it does so by concentrating discretion in the Chief of the Capitol Police and by fronting funds from the Treasury that are later charged to appropriations. That combination raises practical questions: how precisely will the Chief document and justify determinations about who is 'providing support' and which contractor activities qualify?
The statute relies on the existing OPM definitions for excepted and emergency employees, but it does not define 'providing support' for civilians and contractors, leaving room for uneven application and post‑hoc disputes when charges are reconciled against enacted appropriations.
There are also transparency and budgetary trade-offs. Fronting payments during a lapse preserves operational continuity, but it obscures the immediate fiscal consequences of a shutdown by placing costs on future appropriations.
Agencies and appropriations committees will need detailed, auditable records to ensure expenditures are properly charged and to avoid surprise offsets elsewhere in legislative-branch funding. Finally, the retroactivity clause requires pay 'as soon as practicable' for the pre-enactment period; that phrase provides administrative flexibility but invites differing interpretations about timing and prioritization, potentially causing litigation or dispute claims if implementation is delayed.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.