This bill reassigns administrative jurisdiction over two discrete parcels in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia: roughly 25 acres move from the Department of the Interior (National Park Service) to U.S. Customs and Border Protection for its Advanced Training Center, while about 71.51 acres move from CBP to the National Park Service to be incorporated into Harpers Ferry National Historical Park. The transfers are administrative only, require a survey to fix exact legal descriptions, permit clerical corrections to maps, and expressly bar any monetary reimbursement.
Why it matters: the bill changes who manages land, who permits use, and who bears operational and management costs. It also alters park boundaries and creates a reversion mechanism allowing land transferred to CBP to return to NPS if no longer required, while exempting the transfers from an existing statutory acreage cap — a mix that raises practical questions about stewardship, public access, and long-term land planning.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill swaps administrative jurisdiction of two specified parcels in Harpers Ferry: ~25 acres to CBP to be managed as part of its Advanced Training Center and ~71.51 acres to the National Park Service to be incorporated into Harpers Ferry National Historical Park. It requires a boundary survey, allows clerical fixes to legal descriptions, and prohibits monetary payment for the transfers.
Who It Affects
Primary actors are the Department of the Interior (National Park Service) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection; local land managers, historic-preservation stakeholders, and federal land planners will also be directly affected. The Secretary of the Interior and the CBP Commissioner gain discrete administrative responsibilities and decision authority under the bill.
Why It Matters
The bill reallocates management authority without changing title, which shifts permitting, access, and operational control between a law-enforcement training mission and a preservation-focused park. The reversion clause and statutory-exemption change how agencies can later adjust park size and use, with implications for resource planning, public access, and interagency coordination.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill performs two complementary jurisdictional transfers in Harpers Ferry. First, it transfers administrative jurisdiction over roughly 25 acres from the Secretary of the Interior to the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; CBP will administer that parcel as part of its Advanced Training Center and the Secretary must redraw the Park boundary to exclude it.
Second, the bill moves approximately 71.51 acres from CBP to the Secretary so that NPS will manage it as part of Harpers Ferry National Historical Park and adjust park boundaries to include it.
Mechanically, the bill treats these as administrative-jurisdiction transfers rather than conveyances of title or sales: there is no monetary reimbursement. The Commissioner must obtain a survey to finalize precise acreage and legal descriptions, provide the survey to the Secretary, and may — in consultation with the Secretary — correct clerical or typographical errors in existing maps and descriptions.
The bill cites a specific NPS map (numbered 385/176,677, dated May 2021) as the reference, so the practical boundary work starts from that cartographic baseline.The bill contains a reversion and restoration mechanism: if the Commissioner later determines that any or all of the land transferred to CBP is not required for the Advanced Training Center, administrative jurisdiction of that land must revert to the Secretary in a condition acceptable to the Secretary and the land will be administered as part of the Park. The statute also expressly states that the acreage limitation in section 1(d) of the Act of June 30, 1944 (16 U.S.C. 450bb(d)) does not apply to these transfers or to any land that later reverts, removing that statutory cap as a constraint on the Park’s adjusted boundaries.Throughout, the bill leaves implementation details to the agencies but anchors them with requirements that drive operational steps: survey completion, interagency consultation on legal descriptions, boundary adjustments by the Secretary, and an administrative finding by the Commissioner to trigger reversion.
It also leaves all transferred land subject to "applicable law," which means environmental reviews, historic-preservation obligations, and other statutory duties remain in play during any future development or management changes.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Approximately 25 acres depicted as "Area to be Transferred to CBP" move from DOI/NPS to CBP for administration as part of CBP’s Advanced Training Center, and approximately 71.51 acres depicted as "Area to be Transferred to NPS" move from CBP to the National Park Service to be incorporated into Harpers Ferry National Historical Park.
The Commissioner of CBP must obtain a survey to finalize the exact acreage and legal description of the parcel transferred to CBP, and must deliver a complete copy of that survey to the Secretary of the Interior.
The bill permits the Commissioner, in consultation with the Secretary, to correct clerical or typographical errors in legal descriptions and maps — enabling post-transfer adjustments short of new legislation.
If the Commissioner determines that any of the land transferred to CBP is not required for the Advanced Training Center, administrative jurisdiction for that land reverts to the Secretary and the land is to be administered as part of the Park.
The transfers are without monetary reimbursement and the statute exempts the parcels (including any that revert) from the acreage limitation in 16 U.S.C. 450bb(d), removing that statutory cap for these lands.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Transfer of ~25 acres from DOI/NPS to CBP and boundary exclusion
This provision moves administrative jurisdiction of the parcel labeled "Area to be Transferred to CBP" (roughly 25 acres) from the Secretary to the Commissioner and requires the Secretary to adjust Harpers Ferry NHP boundaries to exclude it. Practically, CBP gains management and operational control for training purposes while NPS relinquishes administrative control and related permitting authority for that footprint.
Survey and clerical corrections
The Commissioner must commission a survey to finalize the acreage and legal description, provide the survey to the Secretary, and may, with the Secretary, correct clerical or typographical errors in maps or descriptions. That creates an administrative pathway for narrowing discrepancies between map-based depictions and surveyed realities without further legislative acts, but it places the initial costs and technical work on the acquiring agency.
Transfer of ~71.51 acres from CBP to NPS and inclusion in the Park
This subsection transfers administrative jurisdiction for the parcel depicted "Area to be Transferred to NPS" (about 71.51 acres) from the Commissioner to the Secretary; the land must be administered as part of Harpers Ferry NHP and the Secretary must update park boundaries accordingly. Operationally, NPS becomes responsible for resource protection, visitor access standards, and park management obligations on that acreage.
No monetary consideration and reversion mechanism
The statute specifies both that the transfers occur without monetary reimbursement and that, if CBP later determines the CBP parcel is not needed, jurisdiction reverts to the Secretary and the reverted land is to be administered as parkland. This dual rule removes sale proceeds from the transaction and gives CBP discretion to trigger reversion based on operational need, subject to the Secretary's acceptance of condition on return.
Acreage-cap exemption and statutory definitions
The bill exempts these parcels (including any that revert) from the acreage limitation in 16 U.S.C. 450bb(d), effectively removing that statutory cap as a constraint on the Park’s adjusted boundaries. The definitions section pins the map source (NPS map 385/176,677, May 2021) and defines key terms (Commissioner, Secretary, Park), fixing the legal reference points for implementation.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Government across all five countries.
Explore Government in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection — gains administrative control of roughly 25 acres for its Advanced Training Center, providing CBP with expanded training space and direct management authority over access, security, and facility operations.
- National Park Service / Harpers Ferry NHP — receives about 71.51 acres to incorporate into the Park, which can expand interpretive resources, trail networks, or conservation zones under NPS stewardship.
- Local land planners and emergency services — benefit from clarified jurisdictional maps and boundaries that reduce uncertainty over permitting, law enforcement responsibility, and land-management coordination.
- Visitors and heritage stakeholders (potentially) — if NPS integrates the new acreage for public access or interpretation, visitors may gain new park space and interpretive opportunities tied to Harpers Ferry’s historic landscape.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Homeland Security/CBP — must fund and execute the survey, assume operational costs for training infrastructure, and may face mitigation or environmental compliance costs tied to converting the parcel to training use.
- National Park Service — absorbs the operational and maintenance costs for the added 71.51 acres, including potential restoration, staffing, and resource-protection obligations without a transfer payment from CBP.
- Federal agencies generally — the surveying, mapping, boundary adjustments, and any required environmental or historic-preservation compliance will generate planning, legal, and technical costs across agencies.
- Local communities and stakeholders — may face reduced public access or increased security buffers near the CBP training site, and may need to absorb indirect costs from changed land uses (traffic, service needs, or constrained recreation areas).
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between operational flexibility for a federal law-enforcement agency that needs training space and the preservation/public-access mission of the National Park Service: granting CBP administrative control solves a practical training need but can fragment park stewardship, alter public access, and transfer management costs to agencies (and potentially taxpayers) with no reimbursement mechanism.
The bill uses administrative-jurisdiction transfers rather than a conveyance of title or sale, which keeps federal ownership intact but shifts management responsibilities. That reduces transaction complexity but raises practical questions about which agency holds long-term stewardship obligations and who pays for infrastructure, restoration, and ongoing management.
Requiring the Commissioner to obtain a survey moves the parties toward a precise legal baseline, but it places the technical and financial burden on CBP and allows post-hoc clerical changes that could materially alter on-the-ground boundaries without new legislation.
The reversion clause is operationally simple — CBP decides if land is unnecessary and jurisdiction reverts to the Secretary — but it concentrates a critical trigger in the hands of the acquiring agency. That can create flip-flopping of boundary responsibilities over time and complicates NPS resource planning if CBP uses land temporarily.
The explicit exemption from the 1944 acreage limitation removes a statutory constraint, which expedites boundary adjustments but also means Congress does not retain a built-in ceiling on park expansion for these parcels. Finally, "administered in accordance with applicable law" leaves open how environmental review, historic-preservation compliance, and public-access obligations will be sequenced and funded during any conversion or development for training or park uses.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.