H.R. 6158 would reclassify United States Nationals born and residing in American Samoa as nationals who can obtain U.S. passports identifying them as nationals, with a potential path to U.S. citizenship for those residing in a state or territory covered by INA sections 301–308. The bill accomplishes this by amending the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) §341 to create a two-path passport issuance framework and by renaming the section header and updating the table of contents, while repealing INA §325.
This would formalize a process for passport issuance tied to nationality status and residency, reshaping how certain American Samoa-born individuals participate in the U.S. citizenship framework.
At a Glance
What It Does
Amends INA §341(b) to let a national, but not a citizen, apply for a U.S. passport. Issuance can be either a passport identifying the holder as a national only, or, for those residing in a State or territory subject to INA §301–308, a passport identifying the holder as both a national and a U.S. citizen. The section header is renamed to reflect “non-citizen nationals,” and the table of contents is updated accordingly. The bill also repeals INA §325.
Who It Affects
U.S. nationals born in American Samoa who seek passport status; individuals residing in a state or territory under INA §301–308 who could obtain dual identification as national and citizen; federal agencies (State Department) implementing the new passport classifications; and potential applicants navigating the new framework.
Why It Matters
The measure introduces a formal route to passport identity and potential citizenship for a subset of American Samoa-born individuals, potentially altering rights and mobility. It also signals a shift in how nationality status is documented and how elective citizenship could be accessed, with implications for federal records, travel, and status-based privileges.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill focuses on people born in American Samoa who are U.S. nationals but not U.S. citizens. It would let those individuals apply for a U.S. passport and be identified as a national, and, if they live in a state or territory covered by INA 301–308, they could request a passport that identifies them as both a national and a U.S. citizen.
To accommodate this change, Section 341 of the INA would be renamed to reflect the new “Procedure for passports for U.S. non-citizen nationals.” The bill also repeals Section 325 of the INA as part of adjusting the statutory framework. The practical effect is to provide clearer passport pathways tied to nationality status for American Samoa-born nationals and to offer a potential citizenship route contingent on state/territory residency.
While the law does not create a blanket citizenship for all nationals, it establishes a mechanism by which certain individuals could be documented as citizens upon electing to reside in a qualifying jurisdiction and submitting the appropriate application. The scope is narrow, focusing on the treatment of non-citizen nationals and the administrative mechanics of passport issuance under the INA.
In short, the bill alters how nationality and passport status are conferred on a specific population, aligning paperwork with a broader interpretation of self-determination and individual rights within the U.S. statutory framework. The changes would require administrative implementation by the State Department and related agencies and could affect how affected individuals plan travel, residency, and potential eligibility for citizenship.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates two passport issuance paths for non-citizen nationals: national-only and national-plus-citizen, contingent on residency.
If the applicant resides in a State or territory governed by INA §301–308, a passport can identify the holder as both national and U.S. citizen.
Section 341’s heading would be renamed to ‘Procedure for passports for U.S. non-citizen nationals’ and its table of contents updated accordingly.
Section 325 of the Immigration and Nationality Act would be repealed as part of the statutory changes.
The focus of the bill is on individuals born and residing in American Samoa and their potential access to formal passport status and elective citizenship.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short Title
This section designates the act’s short title as the American Samoa Statutory Nationality and Citizenship Act. It sets the framing for how the statutes addressed by the bill may be cited in further references and implementation.
Reclassification of United States Nationals
Section 2(a) amends INA §341(b) to allow a national, but not a citizen, to apply for a U.S. passport. It provides two issuance paths: (1) a passport identifying the holder as a national only, and (2) a passport identifying the holder as both a national and a U.S. citizen for those residing in a State or territory subject to INA §301–308. Section 2(b) renames INA §341’s header to reflect the new regime, and updates the table of contents. Section 2(c) repeals INA §325. These changes collectively redefine how nationality and passport status can be documented for non-citizen nationals.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Immigration across all five countries.
Explore Immigration in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- American Samoa-born individuals who are U.S. nationals but not citizens gain a codified pathway to formal passport identity as nationals; some may elect to pursue citizenship if residing in qualifying jurisdictions.
- Residents of American Samoa who move to states or territories under INA §301–308 may gain a documented avenue to citizenship via residency and filing requirements.
- Federal agencies (notably the State Department) will gain new, explicit procedures for issuing passports to non-citizen nationals and for documenting dual status when eligible.
- Families and employers of these individuals may experience greater clarity on status, documentation, and mobility options.
Who Bears the Cost
- State Department and related agencies that administer passport issuance will bear the costs of implementing new categories, updating forms, and training staff.
- State and local governments may face administrative burdens related to verifying residency in INA §301–308 jurisdictions and processing any new citizenship determinations.
- Potential transitional costs and administrative adjustments for consular and domestic passport processing systems.
- Potential legal ambiguity during the transition period as affected individuals navigate the new framework and its implications for rights and privileges.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central tension is between expanding formal citizenship pathways and preserving a clear, consistent status framework for all U.S. nationals. Granting elective citizenship contingent on residency could create a two-tier system based on geographic location, while repealing a prior provision (INA §325) and renaming a key section may reduce redundancy but also introduce transitional ambiguity for applicants and administrators.
The bill leverages a narrow subsystem of nationality law to enact a targeted reform for a specific population. While it creates a clear mechanism for documenting non-citizen nationals and affords a possible citizenship path for those who relocate to states or territories governed by INA §301–308, it also raises questions about the scope and limits of national and civil rights within the federal framework.
Implementing agencies will need to align new passport classifications with existing naturalization and travel-document processes, and transitional guidance will be essential to avoid confusion for applicants and officers alike.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.