HB617, the American Music Tourism Act of 2025, amends the Visit America Act to elevate music tourism within federal travel policy. It adds a domestic-travel duty to identify U.S. music-tourism locations and promote travel to them.
It also expands the international-travel framework to include music-tourism destinations and events. Finally, it requires a regular, Congress-facing reporting regime and updates definitions used in the statute.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill adds a specific duty to the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Travel and Tourism to identify music-tourism locations and promote domestic travel to those sites. It also broadens international-travel goals to include music-tourism sites and events, and creates a new reporting requirement.
Who It Affects
Federal travel and tourism program managers, state and local tourism offices, music-venue operators, and large music festivals that could benefit from federal promotion.
Why It Matters
It formalizes music tourism as a policy priority, expanding federal coordination across domestic and international travel and creating measurable reporting on progress and vulnerabilities.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The Act amends the Visit America Act to embed music tourism in federal travel strategy. Section 605(b) is updated to add a new clause requiring the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Travel and Tourism to identify U.S. music-tourism locations and actively promote domestically, directing travel to sites tied to music history, venues, and related events.
The international-travel provisions are expanded to include music-tourism objectives alongside other travel goals, with emphasis on rural and culturally rich destinations, as well as music festivals and live music events. A new reporting subsection mandates annual reporting within one year of enactment and every two years thereafter to Congress on activities, findings, achievements, and vulnerabilities related to these travel goals.
Finally, the bill redefines music tourism and reorganizes related definitions to explicitly cover visits to music-related attractions and attendance at music performances.
The Five Things You Need to Know
Adds a new domestic-travel duty to identify and promote music-tourism locations.
Expands international-travel goals to include music-tourism destinations and events.
Introduces a mandatory reporting regime to Congress on travel goals and progress.
Defines music tourism as visiting music-related attractions or attending live music events.
Renames/restructures related definitions, aligning with the new music-tourism focus.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Domestic travel and music-tourism promotions
Section 605(b) gains a new item (4) requiring the Assistant Secretary to identify locations and events in the United States that are important to music tourism and to facilitate and promote domestic travel to those locations and events. This creates a formal, targeted set of sites for federal promotional activity and aligns domestic travel promotion with music-history and contemporary music-tourism assets.
International travel facilitation for music tourism
Section 605(d) is redesigned to include music tourism among the international-travel goals. The Assistant Secretary, with other federal agencies, must promote international travel to U.S. music-tourism sites and events, while continuing to support large meetings, rural destinations, and cultural-heritage sites. This extends federal emphasis to music venues, festivals, and related experiences abroad.
Reporting on travel goals
A new subsection (4) requires not later than one year after enactment, and every two years thereafter, a formal report to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The report documents activities, findings, achievements, and vulnerabilities related to domestic and international travel goals (a–d), providing a structured accountability mechanism for music-tourism initiatives.
Definitions and terminology
The act revises Section 600 of title VI to rename and reorganize certain terms and to add a definition for music tourism. It defines music tourism as travel to music-related attractions (museums, studios, venues) or attendance at music festivals, concerts, or other live music events. It also updates the COVID–19 public health emergency terminology in this title to reflect the reorganization of sections and terms.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Economy across all five countries.
Explore Economy in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Music venues and festivals gain potential new exposure and visitation through federally promoted itineraries and events.
- Rural and culturally rich destinations receive targeted attention as music-tourism sites, potentially boosting local economies.
- State and local tourism offices can leverage a formal federal focus to attract visitors and coordinate marketing.
- Industry associations and travel operators specializing in concerts and music tourism may see expanded opportunities to package experiences for travelers.
Who Bears the Cost
- Federal agencies will bear the ongoing administrative burden of implementing the new sections and the reporting regime.
- State and local tourism offices may incur costs to align marketing efforts with federal directives and to monitor identified music-tourism sites.
- Music venues and festivals could face increased demand that requires scaling operations or infrastructure, with potential capacity and staffing challenges.
- Any new programmatic emphasis could divert funds from other tourism priorities if federal resources are finite.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing a targeted, music-tourism–specific promotion with the finite resources of federal travel programs—ensuring meaningful, measurable impact without sidelining other tourism priorities or creating uneven support across destinations.
The bill meaningfully elevates music tourism as a federal travel priority, but it raises questions about funding, measurement, and scope. While it creates a defined set of music-tourism sites to promote, it does not specify dedicated appropriations or funding levels for these activities.
The effectiveness of the identification and promotion effort will depend on how agencies translate the new duty into concrete marketing and partnership programs, data collection, and interagency coordination. The reporting requirement improves transparency but invites scrutiny of methodologies, baselines, and the interpretation of “vulnerabilities” in travel goals, which may reflect broader concerns about coordination with state and local tourism initiatives.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.