The STORM Act adds a new provision to the Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to enable private health care workforce platforms to be certified and deployed to surge health care workers during emergencies. It defines what qualifies as a health care workforce platform and who counts as an independent contractor health care worker, and it requires that platforms be self-sustaining outside emergency periods.
The bill then creates a public-private partnership mechanism in which the President may certify platforms and enter into voluntary agreements for their use for the duration of an emergency, with a minimum term of one year. It also authorizes licensure waivers coordinated with states, establishes reporting requirements to Congress, and provides liability protections for workers and platforms, while preserving a regulatory framework to implement these provisions.
At a Glance
What It Does
The Act adds Sec. 504 to the Stafford Act, creating a defined category of private health care workforce platforms and establishing a process for Presidential certification and voluntary deployment during emergencies. It requires platforms to be self-sustaining outside emergencies and sets the minimum duration for deployment at one year.
Who It Affects
Credentialed independent contractor health care workers who work with certified platforms, the platforms themselves, states and local authorities coordinating licensure waivers, and health care facilities relying on surge staffing.
Why It Matters
It creates a formal, rapid-response mechanism for deploying private health care talent via vetted platforms, reducing licensure delays during crises and clarifying liability and regulatory requirements for cross-state deployments.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill creates a new section in the Stafford Act to support surge staffing through private health care platforms. It defines a platform as a private technology company that partners with credentialed independent contractor health care workers, can mobilize workers quickly during emergencies, and remains viable in non-emergency periods.
It also defines what an independent contractor health care worker is and how such workers differ from traditional employees of facilities. The central idea is to enable the President to certify eligible platforms and enter into voluntary agreements with them to use their networks for the duration of emergencies, with each agreement lasting at least one year.
The platforms must be able to self-fund and sustain operations outside emergencies.
The bill then sets up a public-private partnership framework. Certified platforms can be engaged by the President to respond to emergencies, with the agreement covering the entire emergency period.
This mechanism aims to unlock a scalable pool of health care talent by leveraging existing platform networks and their vetting processes. It also sets up a process to facilitate state licensure waivers for out-of-state workers who are deployed through these platforms, including procedures and criteria such as background checks and qualifications.
States can adopt these model procedures at the time of the emergency, and the President will coordinate with state authorities to ease licensure, considering state-specific regulations. Additionally, the act imposes reporting requirements.
Within a year of enactment and annually thereafter, the President must report to Congress on the use of licensure waivers, the duration of deployments, and challenges encountered in implementing licensure waivers. On liability, the bill provides broad liability protections for independent contractor health care workers and platforms when operating under the authorized activities, with carve-outs for willful misconduct, gross negligence, or bad faith.
It also covers potential implications under the Federal Tort Claims Act for federally contracted activities and directs the President to issue implementing regulations. In short, STORM creates a structured path to mobilize private health care talent quickly, while aiming to preserve safety, accountability, and federal oversight during emergencies.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill creates a new health care workforce platform category and a certification pathway under the Stafford Act.
Presidential certification allows the use of these platforms for the duration of declared emergencies, with a minimum one-year term.
It facilitates state licensure waivers for out-of-state workers deployed via certified platforms, including model procedures and background checks.
It provides liability protections for workers and platforms engaged in authorized emergency activities, with exceptions for misconduct.
It requires annual Congressional reporting on waiver usage, deployment duration, and implementation challenges, and authorizes regulatory rules to implement the framework.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Definitions and scope
This section defines a health care workforce platform as a private technology platform that partners with credentialed independent contractor health care workers, can facilitate surge capacity during an emergency, and remains self-sustaining outside emergencies. It also defines an independent contractor health care worker as a licensed professional who works on a contract basis, is credentialed and verified by the platform, and is engaged to respond to emergencies. These definitions establish the actors and capabilities the act seeks to mobilize.
Public-Private Partnership and certification
This provision creates a pathway for the President to certify health care workforce platforms as eligible to enter into voluntary agreements for emergency deployment. The agreement term must be at least one year, formalizing a sustained relationship between the federal government and platform operators to meet surge staffing needs during declared emergencies.
Licensure waivers framework
During emergencies, the President may coordinate with States to facilitate licensure waivers for out-of-state independent contractor workers responding through certified platforms. The section requires model procedures and criteria (including qualifications and background checks), prioritizes rapid deployment, and allows reliance on platform vetting. It also directs coordination with state authorities to implement temporary licenses and consider state-specific regulations.
Reporting requirements
The President must report to Congress, within one year of enactment and annually thereafter, on the use of licensure waivers, deployment durations, and any challenges encountered in waivers. This provision creates accountability by tracking how waivers are used and their practical implications for emergency response.
Liability protections and implementation
This section provides liability protections for independent contractor health care workers and platforms when engaged in authorized activities, with exceptions for willful misconduct, gross negligence, or bad faith. It also contemplates implementing regulations, including rules to determine the applicability of federal tort claims act provisions to activities under this framework.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Healthcare across all five countries.
Explore Healthcare in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Independent contractor health care workers licensed in at least one state who can be deployed quickly through certified platforms and vetted under waivers.
- Health care platforms that coordinate with federal and state authorities to deliver surge staffing.
- State and local health departments managing emergency response, who gain expedited access to qualified personnel.
- Hospitals and clinics in disaster or emergency areas that require rapid staffing to maintain care standards and patient access.
Who Bears the Cost
- Platform operators incur costs for certification, vetting, compliance, and ongoing coordination with federal and state authorities.
- Independent contractor health care workers may bear costs related to background checks, credential verifications, and potential changes in deployment logistics.
- State and local governments may incur administrative costs to adopt model licensure waiver procedures and to coordinate with federal partners.
- The federal government will bear costs associated with regulation, reporting, and oversight of the program, including rulemaking and data collection.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
Balancing the need for rapid, scalable health care deployment during emergencies with the obligation to uphold professional licensure standards, patient safety, and state regulatory autonomy — all under a federal-private partnership framework that assigns novel liability and oversight responsibilities.
The STORM Act hinges on a speed-versus-safety trade-off. By enabling rapid deployment of health care workers through private platforms, it runs the risk of bypassing traditional licensing pathways and varying state requirements in a crisis.
While the act requires model procedures and background checks, the actual implementation could still vary by state, raising concerns about consistency and patient safety. Data privacy and vetting standards for platform systems will be critical, given the cross-state movement of health care workers and the handling of sensitive credential information.
Another tension is between federal coordination and state sovereignty. Licensure waivers are coordinated through the President and federal guidance, but states retain primary regulatory authority over professional licensure.
The law contemplates coordination, however, and relies on established mechanisms to issue temporary licenses, which could still create uneven adoption across jurisdictions during emergencies. A final area of uncertainty concerns the liability framework: while broad protections exist for workers and platforms, exceptions for willful misconduct, gross negligence, or bad faith persist, and the interaction with the Federal Tort Claims Act for federally contracted activities remains complex and potentially contentious.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.