This bill retitles the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection as the Consumer Financial Empowerment Agency, amends the underlying Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to replace references to a ‘bureau’ inside the Federal Reserve System with an ‘independent agency,’ and changes several textual provisions governing the agency’s leadership. It also inserts a deeming clause so every statutory reference to the Bureau will be read as referring to the newly named Agency.
Crucially, the bill eliminates the Bureau’s existing self‑funding language and reworks 12 U.S.C. §1017 to subject the Agency to the regular appropriations process, replacing automatic funding mechanisms with an authorization of appropriations for fiscal years 2026 and 2027. The bill further carries dozens of conforming amendments across major financial statutes to swap the word “Bureau” for “Agency” and to update definitions.
At a Glance
What It Does
Renames the Bureau to the Consumer Financial Empowerment Agency, removes statutory language tying the entity to the Federal Reserve System, amends appointment language so the director ‘shall be appointed by the President,’ and repeals the Bureau’s self‑funding mechanism by moving its budget into the normal appropriations process with explicit appropriations authorization for FY2026–FY2027. It also issues extensive conforming amendments across federal statutes.
Who It Affects
The agency itself (formerly CFPB), congressional appropriations and authorizing committees, the Executive Branch (through increased appointment leverage), regulated financial institutions and nonbank lenders that the Agency oversees, and any entity required to update statutory citations and compliance materials because of the name change.
Why It Matters
The bill changes the institutional checks on consumer‑finance regulation: it converts a statutorily insulated, self‑funded bureau into an agency whose operations depend on annual congressional budgets and a director explicitly appointed by the President. That shift alters incentives for enforcement, rulemaking timelines, and interbranch leverage over consumer‑protection priorities.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill has two operationally important moves. First, it rebrands the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection as the Consumer Financial Empowerment Agency by changing headings, definitions, and repeated statutory language in the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010.
The text removes the phrase that located the Bureau “in the Federal Reserve System” and replaces the phrase “independent bureau” with “independent agency,” signaling a structural reclassification in statutory terms. The bill also revises appointment language in section 1011(b)(5)(A) to read that the director “shall be appointed by the President,” and deletes a discrete paragraph previously found in subsection (c) of section 1011.
It adds a short deeming provision that treats any preexisting reference to the Bureau in law or regulation as a reference to the new Agency, avoiding the need to reword every statute by hand but also making a wholesale legal identity change.
Second, the bill upends the Agency’s funding model. It rewrites section 1017 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act to remove the statutory self‑funding and transfer mechanisms that allowed the Bureau to draw on Federal Reserve funds, strikes several paragraphs and subsections that implemented those mechanisms, and replaces them with a plain authorization of appropriations for fiscal years 2026 and 2027.
Practically, that subjects the Agency to the annual congressional appropriations process rather than an independent, off‑budget source of revenue.The bill also carries a very large set of conforming amendments across federal law. It updates the names and defined terms in Dodd‑Frank and amends dozens of other statutes — from Truth in Lending and the Fair Credit Reporting Act to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and multiple consumer‑financial statutes — replacing “Bureau” with “Agency,” inserting new definitions where needed, and adjusting cross‑references.
Those fixes are mechanical in form but wide in scope: virtually every federal provision that referenced the CFPB is altered so existing citations now point to the Consumer Financial Empowerment Agency.Taken together, these changes shift the locus of control over consumer financial regulation. Name changes and cross‑reference edits are straightforward drafting work.
The deeper, programmatic effect is the removal of a statutory funding firewall and a clearer statement of presidential appointment authority—both of which change how durable the Agency’s enforcement priorities and staffing might be over time. The bill’s text does not itself set new substantive regulatory standards; instead it restructures how the institution is constituted, led, and resourced.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The bill renames the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to the Consumer Financial Empowerment Agency and adds a deeming clause treating every prior statutory or regulatory reference to the Bureau as a reference to the Agency.
It amends 12 U.S.C. §1011 to remove the phrase placing the Bureau 'in the Federal Reserve System,' replace 'independent bureau' with 'independent agency,' and change numerous headings and defined terms from 'Bureau' to 'Agency.', Section 2 alters appointment text in section 1011(b)(5)(A) so the director 'shall be appointed by the President;' the bill also deletes paragraph (3) of subsection (c) and removes other specified subsections without replacing their substantive content.
Section 3 strikes the Bureau’s existing budget and transfer provisions in 12 U.S.C. §1017 and instead authorizes appropriations for fiscal years 2026 and 2027, thereby subjecting the Agency to the regular annual appropriations process.
The bill makes dozens of conforming amendments across major statutes (Dodd‑Frank, Truth in Lending, Fair Credit Reporting Act, FDIA, RESPA, TILA, and others) to replace 'Bureau' references with 'Agency' and to insert new or revised definitions where required.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Short title
Provides the bill’s public name — the Taking Account of Bureaucrats’ Spending (TABS) Act of 2025. This is the housekeeping provision; it signals legislative intent to focus on spending and institutional control but carries no operative effect on the agency’s functions.
Statutory reclassification and leadership text changes (12 U.S.C. §1011)
Rewrites key phrases in the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010: replaces the Bureau’s formal name and heading, deletes the statutory language that placed the Bureau 'in the Federal Reserve System,' and substitutes the term 'Agency' for 'Bureau' throughout the amended text. It also modifies appointment language so the director 'shall be appointed by the President' and removes a specified paragraph from subsection (c). Practically, this changes the statutory framing of the regulator from a quasi‑independent bureau attached to the Fed to an 'independent agency' in the statutory lexicon and alters the text that governs leadership selection.
Deeming clause and broad conforming amendments
Section 2(b) provides a general deeming rule: every legal reference to the Bureau will be read as referring to the Consumer Financial Empowerment Agency. Section 2(c) then implements sweeping conforming edits across federal law — amending Dodd‑Frank’s table of contents and definitions, and updating dozens of statutes (Truth in Lending, RESPA, FDIA, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Electronic Fund Transfer Act, and many others) to reflect the new name and definitions. These are drafting mechanics, but because they touch many separate legal regimes, they require coordinated implementation across agencies, courts, and private contracts that currently cite the old name.
Moves the Agency onto the regular appropriations track (12 U.S.C. §1017)
Overhauls section 1017 by striking most of the existing text that governed budget, audits, and non‑appropriated funding, redesignating and pruning subsections, and inserting an express authorization of appropriations for FY2026 and FY2027. In short, the statutory mechanism that previously allowed the Bureau to be funded outside the annual appropriations cycle is removed; the Agency will rely on Congress to appropriate funding going forward. The provision also simplifies the budget headings and eliminates prior transfer and funding details, creating a new baseline where appropriations and congressional oversight determine resources.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Finance across all five countries.
Explore Finance in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- House and Senate Appropriations Committees — Gain formal leverage over the Agency’s funding levels and priorities because the Agency will require annual appropriations rather than drawing funds independently.
- The President and Executive Branch — Increases presidential control over the Agency’s leadership through clearer appointment language and places budgetary leverage in a process where the White House traditionally plays a larger role.
- Industry trade groups and regulated firms — Potentially benefit from increased political and budgetary influence over enforcement priorities if appropriations become a tool to constrain or condition Agency activities.
Who Bears the Cost
- The Consumer Financial Empowerment Agency (formerly CFPB) — Faces loss of a statutorily insulated revenue stream and new exposure to annual budgetary cycles, which could constrain long‑term rulemaking, staffing, and enforcement programs.
- Consumer and public-interest groups — May experience reduced enforcement capacity and instability in long‑term consumer‑protection initiatives if appropriations fall short or become politicized.
- Compliance officers, counsel, and legal publishers — Will need to update internal policies, contracts, disclosures, and statutory citations across a large body of law and commercial documents because of the name change and altered cross‑references.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill pits democratic control over spending and leadership against the historical rationale for insulating financial‑consumer oversight from short‑term political pressure: subjecting the regulator to annual appropriations and clarifying presidential appointment increases accountability but risks politicizing enforcement, undermining continuity, and shrinking the Agency’s capacity for long‑term consumer‑protection work.
The bill solves one problem (consolidating nomenclature and inserting a clear funding hook for Congress) but exposes a set of implementation and legal questions. First, the appointment language is terse: it replaces prior wording with 'shall be appointed by the President' but does not explicitly restate whether the appointment requires Senate confirmation or whether removal protections remain intact.
That ambiguity could produce litigation or require further statutory fixes.
Second, removing statutory self‑funding and placing the Agency on appropriations creates operational risk. Annual budgeting introduces uncertainty into long‑term enforcement and supervisory projects, potentially shortening planning horizons for rulemaking, supervised examinations, and litigation.
It also hands Congress a lever—useful for democratic accountability but also for conditional funding or micromanagement. Finally, the mass of conforming amendments across dozens of statutes is mechanically necessary but practically hazardous: drafting oversights or inconsistent edits could create cross‑reference errors, alter delegated authorities in unexpected places, or require agencies and courts to interpret transitional scope and exceptions (the bill already preserves some specified exceptions).
The administrative burden of implementing the name change and budget shift across the federal government and private sector will be nontrivial.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.