HB 6637 (the Market Choice Act and related titles) adds a new Subtitle L to the Internal Revenue Code that levies a per-ton charge on greenhouse gas emissions tied to fossil fuels, specified industrial processes, and certain product uses. The measure builds a layered compliance and refund system—refunds for verified sequestration and non‑combustive product uses, credits for state-level payments, and stiff penalties for nonpayment—and pairs the domestic levy with a border tax adjustment scheme for trade-exposed manufactured goods.
The bill directs the bulk of the resulting revenue into a newly created Rebuilding Infrastructure and Solutions for the Environment (RISE) Trust Fund, with preset percentage allocations to highways, aviation, rebates for low-income households via states, climate research, coastal flood projects, and worker assistance. It also inserts a limited moratorium and carve-outs into the Clean Air Act for emissions subject to the tax, establishes a National Climate Commission, and contains dozens of separate titles (cancer research funding, PFAS coordination, election and ethics changes, anti‑trafficking banking measures, school-safety rules, and VA personnel reforms) that extend the bill far beyond climate policy.
At a Glance
What It Does
The bill imposes three parallel levies under new IRC Subtitle L: a fossil‑fuel combustion tax, taxes on listed industrial process emissions, and taxes on specific product uses. The initial carbon rate is $35 per metric ton in calendar year 2027 with an annual increase rule tied to CPI and a fixed add‑on if aggregate taxable emissions exceed statutory thresholds; the tax is collected at upstream points (mine mouth, refinery exit, import entry, or affected facility). A border tax adjustment program taxes imported covered goods and rebates taxes on exports for designated industrial sectors.
Who It Affects
Upstream fuel owners, refineries, gas processors, large industrial facilities emitting >25,000 metric tons CO2e/year, manufacturers of listed products, and importers of trade‑exposed goods will face direct tax or compliance obligations. State governments, the Highway Trust Fund and designated federal programs will be primary recipients of RISE revenues; low‑income households are the explicit target of state‑distributed rebates.
Why It Matters
This is a near‑economy‑wide carbon pricing proposal embedded inside the tax code, tied to a revenue allocation plan that will reshape infrastructure funding and climate investment. It changes how federal environmental authority interacts with taxed emissions, creates a novel trade enforcement and rebate mechanism, and raises immediate compliance, accounting, and trade policy issues for energy, manufacturing, and transportation sectors.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
HB 6637 turns greenhouse gas limits into a tax-based system rather than relying solely on regulatory controls. Treasury and EPA share implementation duties: Treasury (Internal Revenue Code changes) defines points of taxation, collects the tax, administers credits for state payments, and handles refunds for sequestration and qualifying non‑combustive uses; EPA (the Administrator) provides emissions calculations, reviews sector lists, and helps set methods for estimating lifecycle emissions.
The tax is upstream where possible—coal at mine mouth, petroleum at refinery exit, natural gas at the gas processor or first sale point—and for many industrial process sources by facility when emissions exceed statutory thresholds.
To prevent domestic competitiveness losses, the bill establishes a border tax adjustment (BTA) program that levies an import charge, calibrated to the domestic tax that would have been paid, and rebates taxes paid on exports of covered goods. The Secretary of the Treasury and U.S. Customs are tasked with defining covered goods, setting BTA rates, and building administrative procedures; the President retains discretion to suspend BTAs for national‑interest reasons.
The bill also provides transitional credits for state programs so that state carbon measures can be credited against federal liability for a limited period.Revenue flows are pre‑allocated in statute to the RISE Trust Fund (75% of Subtitle L receipts are deposited to the Trust). Those funds are earmarked in fixed percentages to the Highway Trust Fund, airport and aviation trusts, coastal flood mitigation projects, advanced research programs (including carbon removal R&D), worker assistance, and state grants to offset costs for low‑income households.
The bill includes wage and Davis‑Bacon style labor standards on projects funded from RISE. Finally, the package contains a Clean Air Act moratorium for emissions that are taxed under Subtitle L (with statutory sunset and triggers tied to emissions outcomes), creates a National Climate Commission to set emissions reduction goals and report periodically, and folds in a number of unrelated but substantive policy changes across health, veterans, elections, and financial crimes policy.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The tax rate starts at $35 per metric ton CO2e in calendar year 2027 and thereafter increases by the prior year’s CPI plus 5 percentage points; additional $4/ton increases occur if cumulative emissions exceed detailed statutory thresholds at periodic reporting dates.
Tax collection points are upstream: coal at the mine mouth (or coal wash exit), petroleum at refinery exit, and natural gas at the processing plant or the first sale; imported fuels are taxed at first entry into the United States.
The border tax adjustment program ties covered goods to NAICS/Harmonized Tariff Schedule codes, uses greenhouse‑gas intensity and trade‑intensity criteria to list eligible sectors, and exempts imports from least‑developed countries or countries below a 0.5% global emissions threshold in certain circumstances.
RISE Trust Fund receives 75% of Subtitle L receipts and statutorily directs 70% of annual Trust disbursements (2027–2036) to the Highway Trust Fund; 10% of Trust funds are reserved for state grants to low‑income households, with many small fixed percentages specified for research, flood projects, aviation, and energy R&D.
Enforcement includes a severe penalty for nonpayment equal to three times the applicable tax amount for the same tax year; CCS sequestration refunds require compliance with the timing and regs referenced to section 45Q(f)(2) and will not be paid until those procedures are published.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Economy‑wide greenhouse gas tax framework
The bill inserts a new Subtitle L into the Internal Revenue Code that creates three taxable streams: combusted fossil fuel emissions, listed industrial process emissions, and emissions from certain product uses. It sets an upstream point‑of‑tax approach where feasible and allows refunds where sequestration can be demonstrated or where product manufacturing meaningfully reduces lifecycle emissions. Practically this means Treasury will set rules and collect payments while EPA provides the emissions factors and methods; Treasury cannot begin collections until required regulations are published and at least one year has elapsed, which makes regulatory timing central to when the tax actually starts.
Border tax adjustments for trade‑exposed sectors
To mitigate carbon leakage, the bill establishes a BTA that levies a charge on imported covered goods equivalent to the domestic tax and rebates taxes paid on exports. The Secretary must publish lists tying HTS subheadings to NAICS sectors and compute BTAs annually. The statutory process relies on greenhouse‑gas intensity and trade‑intensity metrics drawn from Census, EIA, and USITC data and also includes an administrative petition route for subsectors—this is a data‑intensive operation with clear WTO and bilateral trade implications.
Up‑front distribution of revenue into defined buckets
The law creates the Rebuilding Infrastructure and Solutions for the Environment Trust Fund and directs 75% of Subtitle L receipts into it, then prescribes exact percentage allocations across many recipients (for example, 70% of Trust disbursements to the Highway Trust Fund for 2027–2036 and a 10% allocation to state grants). The statute names dozens of programs and assigns fractional shares—this removes appropriations discretion for covered shares and locks a multi‑year funding profile into law, which steers long‑term investment but reduces budgetary flexibility.
Temporary moratorium on EPA rules for taxed emissions
The bill adds a moratorium preventing EPA from issuing or enforcing new rules limiting emissions that are subject to Subtitle L taxation, and it prohibits States from being compelled to take such action—subject to enumerated exceptions (certain regulations, monitoring, and a narrow set of facilities). The moratorium contains statutory sunset provisions and emissions‑based triggers that would terminate the moratorium earlier if emissions reduction targets are missed; this creates an unusual statutory trade: use tax policy first, restrict regulation second, and re‑open regulation based on measured outcomes.
Advisory body to set emissions goals and review policy
The Commission is a bipartisan 10‑member body with a defined appointment process, limited appropriations, and a mandate to set emissions reduction goals beginning with a 2031 target and to report every five years. It can collect information from federal agencies and accept private donations (with transparency requirements), but it has no direct rulemaking authority. Its reports and minority views are intended to inform Congress and the Executive on whether current policies are on pace with the Commission’s scientific determinations.
Direct boosts to cancer research and supply‑chain review
The KO Cancer Act appropriates an additional sum equal to 25% of NCI’s FY 2024 appropriation for each fiscal year 2026–2030 (in addition to existing appropriations) and requires a study and report on cancer drug shortages and their causes. This is an explicit, multi‑year infusion for cancer research with a separate FDA‑led diagnostic of supply vulnerabilities.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Environment across all five countries.
Explore Environment in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- State departments of transportation and construction contractors — the statutory RISE allocations direct large, multi‑year flows to the Highway Trust Fund and related infrastructure programs, creating predictable revenue for road, bridge, and airport projects.
- Carbon removal and sequestration project developers — the statute authorizes refunds for sequestered emissions and provides R&D funding for direct air capture and other removal technologies, improving project economics for CCS and related buildouts.
- Low‑income households — the bill dedicates state grant funding and prescribes eligibility and distribution rules intended to offset increased energy or fuel costs for qualifying households through state programs.
- National Cancer Institute and oncology researchers — the KO Cancer Act earmarks recurring supplemental funding equal to 25% of NCI’s FY2024 appropriation for several years, increasing the money available for research and clinical programs.
- Exporters in designated eligible industrial sectors — exporters receive rebates for taxes paid on goods exported under the BTA design, protecting exporters from double taxation and helping preserve market access.
Who Bears the Cost
- Fossil fuel owners, refiners, and gas processors — the tax is collected at upstream points and increases operating costs for fossil fuel production and distribution; those costs may be passed downstream.
- Energy‑intensive manufacturers and certain industrial facilities — facilities listed or added to the industrial process list that emit above thresholds will face direct per‑ton charges and potential competitiveness impacts despite BTA protections.
- Importers and trade‑exposed firms — covered imports will face BTA charges and additional administrative compliance at customs; firms in countries not meeting U.S. climate criteria may face higher effective costs.
- Consumers and transport users — fuel and energy price pass‑through is likely, especially in the near term; although the bill funds rebates, net household impacts will depend on state program design and market pass‑through rates.
- Federal agencies and Treasury/EPA — implementing the tax, emissions accounting, BTA lists, and refund regimes creates sizeable administrative burdens for Treasury, EPA, Customs, and other agencies that require new rulemakings and interagency coordination.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The bill's central dilemma is intentional: it uses a price signal and revenue recycling to reduce emissions and fund infrastructure, but it also limits regulatory authority over taxed emissions—resolving duplicative burdens while risking that the statutory tax path may not be sufficient to meet climate goals, may entrench lower environmental ambition, and may provoke trade and legal countermeasures abroad. Reasonable actors can agree on the need to decarbonize and on the desirability of infrastructure investment, but they will disagree about whether locking the regulatory toolbox behind a tax is the right institutional balance.
The bill trades regulatory authority for a tax‑based approach: it simultaneously establishes a market mechanism to price emissions and inserts statutory restrictions on EPA’s ability to regulate those same emissions. That trade simplifies the compliance landscape for some firms but also erects a statutory barrier to future regulatory tightening, which policymakers cannot easily reverse without amending this statute.
The moratorium and emission‑triggered sunsets are novel and raise questions about whether measured progress will be judged by the right metrics and which agencies retain final interpretive control.
Operationally, the BTA depends on detailed sectoral emissions and trade data, NAICS‑to‑HTS concordances, and recurring administrative determinations. These technical requirements create litigation and trade risk: exporters and trading partners could challenge classification decisions, the calculation of embedded emissions, or the legal basis of BTAs under WTO rules.
The statutory, line‑item allocations into the RISE Trust lock funding priorities and limit congressional appropriation discretion, which is politically durable but reduces flexibility if priorities change or if receipts fall short of projections. Finally, the triple‑tax penalty for nonpayment is aggressive and may prompt insolvency risks for noncompliant entities, while the refund timing for sequestration is explicitly tied to separate 45Q regulations—if those regs are delayed, refund applicants face uncertainty.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.