This bill directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to work with the governments of the Freely Associated States (the Compact partners) to enter agreements that extend certain VA health services to veterans living there. At a minimum the VA must furnish care via telehealth and deliver pharmaceuticals by mail, and the statute sets short implementation deadlines and reporting requirements.
The bill also amends 38 U.S.C. 111(h)(1) to change the structure of payments for beneficiary travel related to these arrangements and requires quarterly reports to the relevant appropriations and veterans’ committees that include implementation costs and, until agreements are in place, technical or logistical impediments. For compliance officers and program managers, the bill creates new cross-border operational, regulatory, and budgetary tasks for the VA and its contractors.
At a Glance
What It Does
Requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to negotiate and enter into agreements with the Freely Associated States to provide at least telehealth services and mail-order pharmacy deliveries to veterans there, with outreach, agreement, and service-start deadlines. It amends 38 U.S.C. 111(h)(1) to alter the payments language for beneficiary travel and mandates quarterly cost-and-implementation reports to Congress.
Who It Affects
Veterans residing in the Freely Associated States (the Compact partners), the Department of Veterans Affairs and its telehealth and pharmacy contractors, the governments of the Freely Associated States (FSM, RMI, Palau), and the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs and Appropriations committees responsible for oversight and funding.
Why It Matters
This extends VA health access beyond U.S. territory under existing Compact authority, imposes tight implementation timelines, and creates ongoing cost and oversight obligations; it forces the VA to tackle cross-border regulatory, logistics, and privacy issues that it has not routinely managed at scale.
More articles like this one.
A weekly email with all the latest developments on this topic.
What This Bill Actually Does
The bill compels the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to move quickly to formalize arrangements with the Freely Associated States under the statutory authorities cited (section 1724(f) of title 38 and section 209(a)(4)(A) of the Compact Amendments Act of 2024). It does not create new categories of benefits; instead it uses existing Compact and VA authority to extend delivery methods—telehealth and mail-order pharmacy—to veterans who live in those countries.
Operationally, the bill sets three near-term deadlines: outreach to each government within 30 days of enactment; executing each required agreement within one year; and beginning to furnish telehealth and mail-order pharmacy services within one year. These deadlines are mandatory “to the maximum extent practicable,” which puts program offices on a tight schedule to negotiate legal terms, identify providers, set up logistics for international drug shipment, and ensure technical connectivity for telehealth.On beneficiary travel, the bill amends the statutory language in 38 U.S.C. 111(h)(1).
The amendment restructures the paragraph to add a new subparagraph that, effectively, requires that when the Secretary uses the authority to make payments under that provision for a fiscal year, the payments described be made; the bill makes this requirement applicable to travel occurring on or after one year after enactment. Finally, the Secretary must submit quarterly reports to the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs and Appropriations committees describing implementation progress, costs, and—until agreements are in effect—technical and logistical barriers that have delayed implementation.
The Five Things You Need to Know
The VA must initiate outreach to each Freely Associated State within 30 days of enactment; outreach is the trigger for the one-year negotiation and service-start clocks.
The Secretary is required to enter into each Compact-based agreement within one year of enactment and to begin offering telehealth and mail-order pharmacy no later than that one-year mark.
The bill amends 38 U.S.C. 111(h)(1) by adding a subparagraph that makes the specified beneficiary-travel payments mandatory for any fiscal year in which the Secretary exercises payment authority; the payment rule applies to travel on or after one year after enactment.
The Secretary must submit implementation-and-cost reports to the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs and Appropriations committees at least quarterly; until agreements are in place, reports must also explain technical and logistical impediments.
The statutory minimum scope of services is limited to telehealth and mail-order pharmaceutical deliveries—other in-person services or broader benefit expansions are not mandated by the text.
Section-by-Section Breakdown
Every bill we cover gets an analysis of its key sections.
Mandate to negotiate Compact-based agreements
This subsection directs the Secretary to work expeditiously with governments of the Freely Associated States to enter into the agreements authorized by 38 U.S.C. 1724(f) and the referenced Compact Amendments Act provision. Practically, it converts existing authority into a statutory imperative to negotiate; program offices will need to draft model agreements, allocate legal resources for international and Compact-specific terms, and coordinate with State and Defense Department counterparts if overlapping arrangements exist.
Minimum service package: telehealth and mail-order pharmacy
The statute requires that the agreements include, at minimum, telehealth services and mail-delivered pharmaceuticals. That sets a floor but not a ceiling: the VA can negotiate additional services, but it cannot implement less. Implementation will require the VA to ensure telehealth platform compatibility across international networks, to confirm pharmacists’ licensure and drug-shipment legality, and to create secure patient-data flows that comply with U.S. law and partner-country requirements.
Implementation timetable and 'maximum extent practicable' qualifier
This subsection imposes three timing duties—initial outreach within 30 days, agreement execution within one year, and service start within one year—qualified by the phrase 'to the maximum extent practicable.' That qualifier gives the VA some operational leeway but also establishes statutory expectations that Congress can use for oversight if deadlines slip. Program managers must document efforts and impediments carefully to justify any missed dates.
Amendment to beneficiary-travel payments (38 U.S.C. 111(h)(1))
The bill amends the statutory paragraph governing VA payments for beneficiary travel by splitting and adding subparagraphs: it preserves the Secretary’s authority to make payments and adds language that requires those payments when the authority is exercised for a fiscal year. The amendment also specifies that this mandatory-payment rule applies to travel occurring on or after one year after enactment. Legal counsel and budget officers will need to interpret how the new wording interacts with existing travel-payment rules and constraints on appropriations.
Quarterly reporting to appropriations and veterans’ committees
The Secretary must report at least quarterly to four congressional committees (House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs and Appropriations) on both implementation status and costs. Until agreements are executed and services begin, each report must also list technical and logistical factors that prevented or slowed implementation. This creates a regular, detailed oversight record and obliges the VA to track both expenditures and non-financial barriers.
Definitions and committee identification
This subsection defines key terms for the section: it ties 'Freely Associated States' to the definition in 38 U.S.C. 1724(f) and lists the 'appropriate committees of Congress' (Veterans’ Affairs and Appropriations in both chambers). That linkage clarifies the geographic scope (the usual Compact partners) and removes ambiguity about which committees receive reports.
This bill is one of many.
Codify tracks hundreds of bills on Veterans across all five countries.
Explore Veterans in Codify Search →Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost
Every bill creates winners and losers. Here's who stands to gain and who bears the cost.
Who Benefits
- Veterans residing in the Freely Associated States (Federated States of Micronesia, Republic of the Marshall Islands, Republic of Palau): gain a statutorily backed pathway to access VA clinical services remotely and receive VA-prescribed medications by mail.
- Remote health vendors and telehealth contractors working with VA: obtain new market opportunities to deliver services and platform integration work across the Compact countries.
- Local health systems and pharmacies in the Freely Associated States: can receive support and supplementary medication supply chains from VA mail-order programs, reducing local shortages when agreements are well-structured.
Who Bears the Cost
- Department of Veterans Affairs: faces new negotiation, legal, program, IT, logistics, and ongoing operational costs to implement cross-border telehealth and international mail-order pharmacy services.
- Appropriations committees and ultimately U.S. taxpayers: will shoulder the fiscal exposure created by mandatory-seeming travel-payment language and the added costs reported quarterly to Congress.
- VA contractors and pharmacy services: must absorb compliance costs tied to international shipping, customs, labeling, and possibly new licensing or contractual requirements to serve patients in sovereign foreign jurisdictions.
Key Issues
The Core Tension
The central dilemma is between expanding access to eligible veterans living in compact partner countries—an equity and policy priority—and the practical, legal, and fiscal burdens of delivering U.S. VA services across international borders: achieving meaningful access requires resolving infrastructure, licensing, customs, privacy, and funding questions that the bill mandates without funding or detailed operational rules.
The bill creates clear policy intent but leaves substantial operational gaps and potential conflicts. First, telehealth and international pharmacy delivery depend on infrastructure—stable internet, reliable postal or courier systems, and port customs processes—that vary widely across the Compact countries.
The one-year negotiation and service-start timelines are ambitious given the need to resolve cross-border licensing, data-privacy rules, and pharmaceutical import/export controls. The 'maximum extent practicable' qualifier provides the VA discretionary cover, but it also invites congressional scrutiny if deliverables are delayed.
Second, the amendment to 38 U.S.C. 111(h)(1) changes payment language in a way that appears to make certain travel payments mandatory in years when the Secretary exercises payment authority. That could increase VA’s fiscal exposure, but the text does not specify funding sources or caps and may collide with appropriations limitations or other statutory constraints.
Lastly, the bill specifies telehealth and mail-order pharmacy 'at a minimum' but omits mechanisms for in-person or emergency care coordination, continuity when telehealth is insufficient, or how clinical standards and liability will be handled across sovereign jurisdictions. These omissions create legal and logistical uncertainty for clinicians, program managers, and veterans relying on tangible access to care.
Try it yourself.
Ask a question in plain English, or pick a topic below. Results in seconds.